Section 14(a) Securities Exchange Act violations
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Officers and directors violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Source (primary)
Konigsberg v. Thiel — Entry #22: ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation to Consolidate (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-27)Live source ↗
Quote: “violations of Sections 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act”
How we checked this
Checked on September 29, 2026. The cited source supports part of this claim, but not all of it.
The consolidation order shows a shareholder alleged Section 14(a) violations, but it makes no finding that any violation occurred and does not identify the defendants as officers or directors.
Confirmed in the source:
- A shareholder derivative lawsuit filed on behalf of Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. alleged violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against ten named individual defendants
We could not confirm this from the cited source:
- That these individuals actually violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the document records only an allegation, not a finding)
- That the defendants were officers and directors of Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (the document names them but does not state their roles)
That does not mean it is false — only that this source does not establish it, as of the date above. If we find a source that settles it, we will re-check and update this page.
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.163350/gov.uscourts.nvd.163350.22.0.pdf) in full (4,641 characters, retrieved September 27, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Konigsberg v. Thiel — Entry #22: ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation to Consolidate
Quote: “violations of Sections 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act”