Unjust enrichment
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Officers and directors were unjustly enriched at the expense of Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
Source (primary)
Konigsberg v. Thiel — Entry #22: ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation to Consolidate (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-27)Live source ↗
Quote: “alleging claims for... unjust enrichment”
How we checked this
Checked on September 29, 2026. The cited source supports part of this claim, but not all of it.
The consolidation order lists unjust enrichment among the claims a shareholder alleged, but it makes no finding that anyone was unjustly enriched and does not identify the defendants' positions.
Confirmed in the source:
- A shareholder derivative lawsuit filed on behalf of Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. alleged unjust enrichment against ten named individual defendants
We could not confirm this from the cited source:
- That these individuals were actually unjustly enriched at Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s expense (the document records only an allegation, not a finding)
- That the defendants were officers and directors of Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (the document names them but does not state their roles)
That does not mean it is false — only that this source does not establish it, as of the date above. If we find a source that settles it, we will re-check and update this page.
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.163350/gov.uscourts.nvd.163350.22.0.pdf) in full (4,641 characters, retrieved September 27, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Konigsberg v. Thiel — Entry #22: ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation to Consolidate
Quote: “alleging claims for... unjust enrichment”