jain.com

1,292 BTC loan repayment via FalconX

Company: Marathon Digital

Subject kind
financing
Statement date
2026-09-17
Promised amount
1292.0 BTC
Current status
stated

The claim, verbatim

Marathon Digital transferred 1,292 BTC (valued at approximately $98.6 million) as a loan repayment through FalconX, not as a new Bitcoin purchase

Source (primary)

MARA clarifies 1,292 BTC transfer was loan repa... - Pluang (-, news_article)
View cached copy (2026-09-22)Live source ↗

Quote: “MARA Holdings clarified that a recent transfer of 1,292 BTC valued at about $98.6 million was a loan repayment, not a new Bitcoin purchase as initially reported by on-chain analytics. The coins had been loaned out through FalconX and their return was misinterpreted as a fresh acquisition.”

How we checked this

Checked on September 26, 2026. The cited source supports part of this claim, but not all of it.

The source confirms the amount, value, FalconX involvement and that this was a loan repayment rather than a purchase. However, it describes the coins being returned to MARA after MARA had lent them out, not MARA sending them to repay a loan, and it uses the name MARA Holdings rather than Marathon Digital.

Confirmed in the source:

We could not confirm this from the cited source:

That does not mean it is false — only that this source does not establish it, as of the date above. If we find a source that settles it, we will re-check and update this page.

What we did: Read our cached copy of the publisher (https://pluang.com/en/news-feed/mara-holdings-klarifikasi-transaksi-bitcoin-adalah-pengembalian-pinjaman-bukan) in full (7,169 characters, retrieved September 22, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.

Additional evidence

confirms MARA clarifies 1,292 BTC transfer was loan repa... - Pluang

Quote: “MARA Holdings clarified that a recent transfer of 1,292 BTC valued at about $98.6 million was a loan repayment, not a new Bitcoin purchase as initially reported by on-chain analytics. The coins had been loaned out through FalconX and their return was misinterpreted as a fresh acquisition.”

View cached copy (2026-09-22)Live source ↗