Applied Digital's demand for payment and threat of litigation
Company: Applied Digital
The claim, verbatim
On June 5, 2025, Applied Digital provided Character Tech. with a draft complaint that it intended to file within 10 days if Character Tech. refused to remit payment for the outstanding GPU lease balance.
Source (primary)
Character Technologies, Inc. v. Applied Digital Corporation — Entry #32: OPINION AND ORDER: Applied Digital's Partial Motion to Dismiss in Character Tech., Court No (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-10)Live source ↗
Quote: “On June 5, 2025, Applied Digital provided Character Tech. with a draft complaint that Applied Digital intended to file within 10 days if Character Tech. refused to remit payment.”
How we checked this
Checked on September 20, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The document states the draft complaint, the June 5, 2025 date, and the 10-day filing intent conditioned on non-payment; the characterization as the outstanding lease balance is consistent with the payment demand described.
Confirmed in the source:
- On June 5, 2025, Applied Digital provided Character Tech. with a draft complaint
- Applied Digital intended to file the complaint within 10 days if Character Tech. refused to remit payment
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.ded.89549/gov.uscourts.ded.89549.32.0.pdf) in full (48,875 characters, retrieved September 10, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Character Technologies, Inc. v. Applied Digital Corporation — Entry #32: OPINION AND ORDER: Applied Digital's Partial Motion to Dismiss in Character Tech., Court No
Quote: “On June 5, 2025, Applied Digital provided Character Tech. with a draft complaint that Applied Digital intended to file within 10 days if Character Tech. refused to remit payment.”