Rejection of Third Addendum termination terms
Company: Applied Digital
The claim, verbatim
Applied Digital did not accept or execute the Third Addendum dated July 29, 2024, asserting that the parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer regarding early termination of the GPU lease.
Source (primary)
Docket 279 entry #32 - 1 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-10)Live source ↗
Quote: “Applied Digital avers that it neither accepted nor executed the Third Addendum because Applied Digital did not agree with the terms, arguing that the Parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Docket 279 entry #32 - 1
Quote: “Applied Digital avers that it neither accepted nor executed the Third Addendum because Applied Digital did not agree with the terms, arguing that the Parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer.”