Conditional release from GPU lease payment obligations
Company: Applied Digital
The claim, verbatim
Applied Digital stated that if it could re-lease the GPU clusters to another customer, it would release Character Tech. from its payment obligations for those re-leased GPUs otherwise due under the Agreement.
Source (primary)
Character Technologies, Inc. v. Applied Digital Corporation — Entry #32: OPINION AND ORDER: Applied Digital's Partial Motion to Dismiss in Character Tech., Court No (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-10)Live source ↗
Quote: “Applied Digital avers that if Applied Digital was able to re-lease the clusters to another customer, Applied Digital would release Character Tech. from its payment obligations for those re-leased GPUs otherwise due under the Agreement.”
How we checked this
Checked on September 20, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The document contains this averment nearly verbatim.
Confirmed in the source:
- Applied Digital stated that if it could re-lease the clusters to another customer, it would release Character Tech. from payment obligations for those re-leased GPUs otherwise due under the Agreement
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.ded.89549/gov.uscourts.ded.89549.32.0.pdf) in full (48,875 characters, retrieved September 10, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Character Technologies, Inc. v. Applied Digital Corporation — Entry #32: OPINION AND ORDER: Applied Digital's Partial Motion to Dismiss in Character Tech., Court No
Quote: “Applied Digital avers that if Applied Digital was able to re-lease the clusters to another customer, Applied Digital would release Character Tech. from its payment obligations for those re-leased GPUs otherwise due under the Agreement.”