Fung v. Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. — Entry #140: ORDER GRANTING DISTRIBUTION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT FUNDS: Motions terminated: 137 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds Motion for Distribution of Class Action…
Case: Fung v. Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc. nysd · 1:22-cv-10658
filed December 16, 2022
What this document is
Docket entry #140 · filed September 04, 2025
ORDER GRANTING DISTRIBUTION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT FUNDS: Motions terminated: 137 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds Motion for Distribution of Class Action Settlement Fund. Having considered all materials and arguments submitt ed in support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Distribution of Class Action Settlement Fund (the "Motion"), including the Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion, and the Declaration of Margery Craig Concerning the Results of the Cl aims Administration Process (the "Craig Declaration"), NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion is GRANTED. 2. This Class Distribution Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipu lation of Settlement dated August 8, 2024 (the "Stipulation") (ECF No. 113-4). All terms not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Stipulation or the Craig Declaration. 3. As set forth in in the Craig Declaration, the administrative determinations of the Claims Administrator, Strategic Claims Services ("SCS"), in accepting and rejecting Claims are approved. Specifically, the administrative determinations of the Claims Admini strator accepting those Claims set forth in Exhibits B-1 and B-2 to the Craig Declaration are approved. Likewise, the administrative determinations of the Claims Administrator rejecting those Claims set forth in Exhibits D and E of the Craig Dec laration are approved. 4. Any person submitting Claims received after January 17, 2025, and any responses to rejected or deficient Claims received after July 28, 2025, the date used to finalize the administration by SCS, are finally and forever barred from asserting such Claims. 5. The funds that are currently in the Net Settlement Fund (less any necessary amounts to be withheld for payment of potential tax liabilities and related fees and expenses) shall be distributed on a pro r
Who is involved
- Barry Edinburg
- Christine Hommes
- Elizabeth Torres
- Geoffrey Strong
- James Crossen
- Jana Keaton
- Joseph Romero
- Kathie Fung
- Matthew Millunchick
- Matthew Potere
- Mike Margent
- Mitchell Wax
- Olivia Wassenaar
- Rodney Yoder
- Spartan Acquisition II Sponsor LLC
- Spartan Acquisition Sponsor II LLC
- Sunlight Financial Holdings Inc.
- Wilson Handler
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CleanSpark: its name “CleanSpark, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” Bishins v. CleanSpark, Inc., No. 21-cv-511, 2021 WL 5741574, at *2 (S…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 27, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 5,220 characters, read from page images by OCR, so expect some character errors · plain text.
Full text
Cas ewe _— a AY Hoan AGina = De Ant 9 Waist oV- LOGSS-ARP socuMeEeNnL Le PG AQE 2 Case 155,cM10668. AKH Document 1371 Filed 07/31/38 Page iof 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MATTHEW MILLUNCHICK and MIKE Case No.: 1:22-cy-10658-AKH MARGENT, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, -against- SUNLIGHT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. f/k/a/ SPARTAN ACQUISITION CORP. II, MATTHEW POTERE, BARRY EDINBURG, RODNEY YODER, GEOFFREY STRONG, JAMES CROSSEN, OLIVIA WASSENAAR, WILSON HANDLER, CHRISTINE HOMMES, JOSEPH ROMEO, and SPARTAN ACQUISITION SPONSOR IT LLC, Defendants. | ORDER GRANTING DISTRIBUTION OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT FUNDS Having considered all materials and arguments submitted in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Distribution of Class Action Settlement Fund (the “Motion”), including the Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion, and the Declaration of Margery Craig Concerning the Results of the Claims Administration Process (the “Craig Declaration”), NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion is GRANTED. 2. This Class Distribution Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation of Settlement dated August 8, 2024 (the “Stipulation”) (ECF No. 113-4). All terms not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Stipulation or the Craig Declaration. on r AC ‘Q. A i Ie Se 3 on ote re Ed A ~*~ * rae rmyrte foe OCU SY nt ie at ¢ -, 4 oor : We CRO ates Oot ten? AS KR LOC i Case Se 59 ov t0658-AKH Document 137- 1 rie X 407/313 Page 2 of3 3. As set forth in in the Craig Declaration, the administrative determinations of the Claims Administrator, Strategic Claims Services (“SCS”), in accepting and rejecting Claims are approved. Specifically, the administrative determinations of the Claims Administrator accepting those Claims set forth in Exhibits B-1 and B-2 to the Craig Declaration are approved. Likewise, the administrative determinations of the Claims Administrator rejecting those Claims set forth in Exhibits D and E of the Craig Declaration are approved. 4, Any person submitting Claims received after January 17, 2025, and any responses to rejected or deficient Claims received after July 28, 2025, the date used to finalize the administration by SCS, are finally and forever barred from asserting such Claims. 5. The funds that are currently in the Net Settlement Fund (less any necessary amounts to be withheld for payment of potential tax liabilities and related fees and expenses) shall be distributed on a pro rata basis to the Authorized Claimants, identified in Exhibits B-1 and B-2 to the Craig Declaration. The funds shall be distributed pursuant to the Stipulation and the Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund set forth in the Notice. 6, The distribution plan for the Net Settlement Fund as set forth in the Craig and accompanying exhibits is approved. The balance of the Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants. The checks for distribution to Authorized Claimants shall bear the notation “CASH PROMPTLY, VOID AND SUBJECT TO RE-DISTRIBUTION 90 DAYS AFTER ISSUE DATE.” Lead Counsel and SCS are authorized to locate and/or contact any Authorized Claimant who has not cashed his, her, or its check within said time. Authorized Claimants who fail to negotiate a distribution check within the time allotted or consistent with the terms outlined in the Craig Declaration will irrevocably forfeit all recovery from the Settlement. _ qe oy 4 ~ aA ween Wate Ne or + ~ or ra a Roe TPT RS gtnn hk a Fa ry iH : oy Bes t rs a Cas PO Le we Mig amt % } ; Pane 3 of Lease Def CV Oss Sony AS KR LJOCUTTIGNY i4 ng Ped VU : ASD sb AS: Case 1:22-cv-10658.AKH Document 137-1. Filed 07/31/25 Page 3 of 3 7. SCS shall submit periodic reports to the Court in accordance with the Court’s Order Appointing Claims Administrator and Requiring Periodic Reports by Claims Administrator CECF No. 115). 8. The Court finds that the administration of the Settlement and proposed distribution of the Net Settlement Fund comply with the terms of the Stipulation and the Plan of Allocation. All persons involved in the review, verification, calculation, tabulation, or any other aspect of the processing of the Claims submitted herein, or otherwise involved in the administration or taxation of the Settlement Fund or the Net Settlement Fund, are released and discharged from any and all claims arising out of such involvement, and all Settlement Class Members, whether or not they are to receive payment from the Net Settlement Fund, are barred from making any further claim against the Net Settlement Fund or the released persons beyond the amount allocated to them pursuant to this Order. 9. SCS is hereby ordered to discard paper or hard copies of claims and all supporting documents no less than one year after distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, and electronic copies of the same no less than | year after all funds in the Settlement Fund are distributed. 10. This Court retains jurisdiction over any further application or matter which may arise in connection with this Action. , 2025 pets ed States District Court judge
