Iraci v. Bradford — Entry #44: ORDER Denying without prejudice 42 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order
Case: Iraci v. Bradford nvd · 2:23-cv-00315
filed February 28, 2023
What this document is
Docket entry #44 · filed May 30, 2023
ORDER Denying without prejudice 42 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Amended Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 6/9/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/30/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
Who is involved
- Bradford
- Iraci
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CleanSpark: its name “CleanSpark, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Thomas L. Wood and Nominal Defendant Cleanspark, Inc. 7 8 UNITED…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 27, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 1,613 characters, read from page images by OCR, so expect some character errors · plain text.
Full text
Oo WO JN DO WV ff WW N_ + NO NO NO NHN NO NO NO NO HN eee Fe Fe Oe —_—— | oOo Nn WO On ff W NY KF CO OO WOW NN WD WN ff W NY kK CO Case 2:23-cv-00315-JAD-NJK Document 44 Filed 05/30/23 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA NICHOLAS IRACT, Case No. 2:23-cv-00315-JAD-NJK Plaintiff, ORDER V. [Docket No. 42] ZACHARY K. BRADFORD, et al., Defendants. Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 42. The presumptively reasonable discovery period is 180 days. Local Rule 26-1(b)(1). Here, however, the parties seek a 345-day discovery period based on the parties’ need to retain multiple experts, conduct multiple depositions, and to allow time for counsel to travel. Docket No. 42 at 2-3. When a specific showing has been made that established deadlines cannot be met in a particular circumstance, the Court has found good cause for extension. The instant request makes no specific showing at all and, instead, relies on generalized assertions that can be made about all litigation. Accordingly, the proposed discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 42. An amended discovery plan must be filed by June 9, 2023. To the extent special scheduling review is sought therein, a specific showing must be made as to why the presumptively reasonable deadlines should not apply based on the particular circumstances of this case. Otherwise, the parties must include the default deadlines, properly calculated from the date of Defendants’ answer or first appearance. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 30, 2023 A Nancy oppe United States Magistrate Judge