jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Naclerio v. DocGo Inc. — Entry #116: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 110 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses., 108 MOTION for Settlement for Final Approval and Approval of Plan of…

Case: Naclerio v. DocGo Inc. nysd · 1:23-cv-09476

filed October 27, 2023

What this document is

Docket entry #116 · filed March 17, 2026

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 110 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses., 108 MOTION for Settlement for Final Approval and Approval of Plan of Allocation. . Document filed by Genesee County Employees' Retirement System. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix (Index of Exhibits), # 2 Exhibit A (In re XL Fleet), # 3 Exhibit B (In re Wells Fargo)).(Wood, Christopher) (Entered: 03/17/2026)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 25, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.609186/gov.uscourts.nysd.609186.116.3.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2025-12-09 00:00:00-05:00
Retrieved
2026-10-25 07:42:10.636260-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
170433
SHA-256
f50d2cbab3116fa6647c031cce47714d4fe858c372b96c408ee8f96d5ad477dc

Document text

4 page(s), 5,834 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 1:23-cv-09476-KPF   Document 116-3   Filed 03/17/26   Page 1 of 4


                  EXHIBIT B


     Case
      Case1:23-cv-09476-KPF
           1:20-cv-04494-JLR-SN
                              Document
                                Document
                                       116-3
                                          205 Filed 03/17/26
                                                    09/08/23 Page
                                                              Page12ofof34


                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


IN RE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
SECURITIES LITIGATION                               Case No. 1:20-cv-04494-JLR-SN


                             ORDER APPROVING
                PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND

       This matter came on for hearing on September 8, 2023 (the “Settlement Hearing”) on Lead

Plaintiffs’ motion to approve the proposed plan of allocation (“Plan of Allocation”) of the Net

Settlement Fund created under the Settlement in the above-captioned class action (the “Action”).

The Court having considered all matters submitted to it at the Settlement Hearing and otherwise;

it appearing that: (i) the Notice of the Settlement Hearing (which included a summary of the

Settlement as well as the full text of the proposed Plan of Allocation) (the “Notice”) was mailed

to all Settlement Class Members who or which could be identified with reasonable effort

substantially in the form approved by the Court and (ii) a summary notice of the hearing

substantially in the form approved by the Court was published in The Wall Street Journal and

Investor’s Business Daily and released over PR Newswire pursuant to the specifications of the

Court; and the Court having considered and determined the fairness and reasonableness of the

proposed Plan of Allocation; and, for the reasons set forth on the record during the Settlement

Hearing,

       NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

       1.     This Order approving the proposed Plan of Allocation incorporates by reference the

definitions in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated May 8, 2023 (Doc. 178-1), and


      Case
       Case1:23-cv-09476-KPF
            1:20-cv-04494-JLR-SN
                               Document
                                 Document
                                        116-3
                                           205 Filed 03/17/26
                                                     09/08/23 Page
                                                               Page23ofof34


as amended on August 31, 2023 (the “Stipulation”) and all terms not otherwise defined herein shall

have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation.

        2.      The Court has jurisdiction to enter this Order approving the proposed Plan of

Allocation, and over the subject matter of the Action and all Parties to the Action, including all

Settlement Class Members.

        3.      Notice of Lead Plaintiffs’ motion for approval of the proposed Plan of Allocation

was given to all Settlement Class Members who or which could be identified with reasonable

effort. The form and method of notifying the Settlement Class of the motion for approval of the

proposed Plan of Allocation satisfied the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), and the Private

Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4, as amended; constituted the best

notice practicable under the circumstances; and constituted due and sufficient notice to all persons

and entities entitled thereto.

        4.      Copies of the Notice, which included the Plan of Allocation, were mailed to over

1,835,000 potential Settlement Class Members and nominees, and no objections to the Plan of

Allocation have been received.

        5.      The Court hereby finds and concludes that the formula for the calculation of the

claims of Claimants as set forth in the Plan of Allocation mailed to Settlement Class Members

provides a fair and reasonable basis upon which to allocate the proceeds of the Net Settlement

Fund among Settlement Class Members with due consideration having been given to

administrative convenience and necessity.


                                                 2


      Case
       Case1:23-cv-09476-KPF
            1:20-cv-04494-JLR-SN
                               Document
                                 Document
                                        116-3
                                           205 Filed 03/17/26
                                                     09/08/23 Page
                                                               Page34ofof34


       6.      The Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation is, in all respects,

fair and reasonable to the Settlement Class. Accordingly, the Court hereby approves the Plan of

Allocation proposed by Lead Plaintiffs.

       7.      Any appeal or any challenge affecting this Order approving the Plan of Allocation

shall in no way disturb or affect the finality of the Judgment.

       8.      There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Order, and immediate entry by

the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed.

       SO ORDERED this __8_____
                          th            September ___ 2023.
                                day of ___________


                                                ________________________________________
                                                      The Honorable Jennifer L. Rochon
                                                         United States District Judge


                                                   3