Redstone Logics LLC v. Qualcomm Inc. — Entry #62: Opposed MOTION to Stay Case Pending the Ex Parte Reexamination by Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Technologies, Inc
Case: Redstone Logics LLC v. Qualcomm Inc. txwd · 7:24-cv-00231
filed September 20, 2024
What this document is
Docket entry #62 · filed June 04, 2026
Opposed MOTION to Stay Case Pending the Ex Parte Reexamination by Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: (1) Proposed Order, (2) Declaration of E. Green, (3) Exhibit 1, (4) Exhibit 2, (5) Exhibit 3, (6) Exhibit 4, (7) Exhibit 5, (8) Exhibit 6)(Leventhal, Daniel)
Who is involved
- Qualcomm Inc.
- Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
- Redstone Logics LLC
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its former name “MARA Holdings, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…... 1 Malikie Innovations LTD. et al v. Mara Holdings INC., No. 7:25-cv-00222-DC-DTG (W.D. Tex. June…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 02, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 759 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-1 Filed 06/04/26 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION
REDSTONE LOGICS LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 7:24-cv-00231-ADA
QUALCOMM INC.; QUALCOMM
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSED MOTION TO STAY
The Court has considered Defendants’ Motion to Stay and is of the opinion that the Motion
should be GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this __________ day of _______________, 2026.
i