Redstone Logics LLC v. Qualcomm Inc. — Entry #62: Opposed MOTION to Stay Case Pending the Ex Parte Reexamination by Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Technologies, Inc
Case: Redstone Logics LLC v. Qualcomm Inc. txwd · 7:24-cv-00231
filed September 20, 2024
What this document is
Docket entry #62 · filed June 04, 2026
Opposed MOTION to Stay Case Pending the Ex Parte Reexamination by Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: (1) Proposed Order, (2) Declaration of E. Green, (3) Exhibit 1, (4) Exhibit 2, (5) Exhibit 3, (6) Exhibit 4, (7) Exhibit 5, (8) Exhibit 6)(Leventhal, Daniel)
Who is involved
- Qualcomm Inc.
- Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
- Redstone Logics LLC
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its former name “MARA Holdings, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…... 1 Malikie Innovations LTD. et al v. Mara Holdings INC., No. 7:25-cv-00222-DC-DTG (W.D. Tex. June…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 02, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
14 page(s), 30,830 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 1 of 14
EXHIBIT 6
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 2 of 14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
REDSTONE LOGICS LLC, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§ Case No. 7:24-CV-00231-ADA
v. §
§ JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
§
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED AND §
QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., §
§
Defendants. §
DEFENDANTS’ THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO
REDSTONE LOGICS LLC’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES NOS. 1-15
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Federal Rules”) 26 and 33, the Local Rules
of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (“Local Rules”), and the
Court’s Standing Order Governing Proceedings (OGP) 4.4—Patent Cases (“OGP”), Defendants
Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (“Collectively Qualcomm”) hereby
submit the following Third Supplemental Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Redstone Logics
LLC’s (“Plaintiff” or “Redstone”) First Set of Interrogatories, dated June 10, 2025
(“Interrogatories”). Qualcomm has not completed its investigation of the facts relating to this
litigation, has not completed its discovery in this action, and has not completed its preparation for
trial. Accordingly, these Objections and Responses are preliminary and based only upon the
information presently available and known to Qualcomm.
Qualcomm reserves the right to further supplement and amend its Objections and
Responses to the Interrogatories as the litigation develops and if and when it discovers any
additional relevant and responsive information. Qualcomm further reserves the right to object to
the admissibility of any of its Interrogatory Responses or any of the documents produced to
1 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 3 of 14
QCREDSTONE_0117887, QCREDSTONE_0141773.
Qualcomm’s investigation remains ongoing, and Qualcomm reserves the right to amend or
supplement the foregoing.
INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
For each Accused Product, Relevant Component, and each product You identified in
response to Interrogatory No. 1, identify and describe in detail the dates and circumstances it was
first: (a) publicly announced, (b) put into active service, (c) offered for sale, and (d) sold, and
identify the person(s) responsible for each activity.
MARCH 6, 2026 AMENDED RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
Qualcomm hereby incorporates by reference General Objections, its Objections to
Definitions, and its Objections to Instructions above as if fully set forth herein.
Qualcomm objects to the phrases “for each,” “Accused Product,” “Relevant Component,”
“each product,” “circumstances,” “publicly announced,” “put into active service,” “offered for
sale,” and “responsible for each activity” as unfairly vague and ambiguous, and causing this
Interrogatory to seek discovery that is overly broad, unduly burdensome, not relevant to any claim
or defense in the litigation, not proportional to the needs of the litigation, not reasonably calculated
to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and for which the burden or expense outweighs its
likely benefit to the extent the phrases are not defined and require Qualcomm to provide
information not ascertainable through a diligent search of reasonable scope and/or not reasonably
related to any allegation in this case.
Qualcomm also objects that the phrases “each Accused Product, Relevant Component, and
each product You identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1” are overly broad and unduly
burdensome to the extent they seek to impose a burden on Qualcomm to identify information not
33 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 4 of 14
discovered through a diligent search of reasonable scope. Qualcomm incorporates by reference
its objections to Interrogatory No. 1 as if set forth fully herein.
Qualcomm further objects to this Interrogatory as vague, overbroad, unduly burdensome,
and not proportional to the needs of the litigation for its use of the vague phrases “Accused
Product” and “Relevant Component” to the extent the Interrogatory seeks information about
products not specifically accused of infringement in Redstone’s operative infringement
contentions.
Qualcomm further objects to this Interrogatory as uncertain, overly broad, unduly
burdensome, and oppressive as it fails to specify any responsive time period, and accordingly is
not limited to events relevant to this litigation.
Qualcomm further objects to this Interrogatory to the extent it purports to require
Qualcomm to furnish information that is not kept in the ordinary course of its business or to furnish
information that is equally available and/or publicly accessible to Redstone.
Qualcomm further objects to this Interrogatory as compound to the extent it improperly
requires Qualcomm to respond regarding multiple, discrete subjects couched as a single
Interrogatory. This Interrogatory requires Qualcomm provide multiple discrete pieces of
information and separate responses for multiple products. Qualcomm also objects to this
Interrogatory as overly broad and unduly burdensome for the same reasons.
Qualcomm further objects to this Interrogatory as vague and unduly burdensome to the
extent that it relies upon defined terms that themselves are objectionable. Qualcomm incorporates
by reference its above objections to the definitions of these terms as if set forth fully herein.
Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections and based on Qualcomm’s
understanding of this Interrogatory, Qualcomm states:
34 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 5 of 14
For products identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1, the earliest corresponding order
date is as follows:
Family Earliest Worldwide order identified Earliest U.S. order identified in
Designation in Qualcomm’s financial records Qualcomm’s financial records
APQ8056 9/1/2015 2/1/2017
APQ8096 8/13/2015 12/8/2015
APQ8096A 12/14/2018 5/3/2019
APQ8096AU 9/23/2016 9/23/2016
APQ8098 7/26/2016 9/19/2016
CQ7790M 9/18/2025 2/4/2026
CQ7790S 8/28/2025 8/28/2025
MSM8956 8/7/2015 6/16/2017
MSM8996 6/24/2015 8/28/2015
MSM8996AU 6/14/2017 9/26/2017
MSM8998 6/24/2016 10/26/2016
QAM8155P 8/23/2020 10/26/2021
QAM8195P 9/28/2020 1/27/2021
QAM8255P 5/20/2022 8/8/2022
QAM8295P 1/11/2021 9/23/2021
QAM8295PS 10/21/2022 1/4/2023
QAM8540P 2/10/2021 10/6/2021
QAM8650P 6/15/2022 10/12/2022
QAM8770P 1/24/2025 #N/A
QAM8775P 11/7/2022 1/23/2023
QAMSRV1M 7/19/2022 2/18/2025
QCM4290 7/28/2020 7/28/2020
QCM4325 1/13/2023 #N/A
QCM4490 1/16/2023 4/5/2023
QCM5430 7/31/2022 #N/A
QCM6125 7/12/2020 4/5/2022
35 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 6 of 14
Family Earliest Worldwide order identified Earliest U.S. order identified in
Designation in Qualcomm’s financial records Qualcomm’s financial records
QCM6490 3/7/2021 4/25/2022
QCM6690 9/11/2024 2/4/2025
QCM8538 12/18/2024 #N/A
QCM8550 7/13/2023 11/3/2023
QCR100 11/2/2023 11/9/2023
QCS410 1/21/2020 10/19/2020
QCS4290 7/28/2020 7/28/2020
QCS4490 2/13/2023 7/20/2023
QCS5430 7/28/2022 2/16/2023
QCS603 2/13/2018 6/6/2019
QCS605 10/1/2017 11/16/2017
QCS610 11/27/2018 3/1/2019
QCS6125 7/12/2020 7/6/2022
QCS615 1/23/2025 #N/A
QCS6490 3/7/2021 4/25/2022
QCS6690 9/11/2024 2/4/2025
QCS7230 4/7/2022 4/5/2023
QCS8155M 11/14/2021 10/21/2025
QCS8245 3/8/2021 8/2/2022
QCS8250 10/15/2020 12/7/2020
QCS8275 1/14/2025 #N/A
QCS8300 6/23/2025 #N/A
QCS8535N 12/15/2025 #N/A
QCS8550 1/10/2023 3/27/2023
QCS8550N 12/11/2024 2/27/2025
QCS8625 1/16/2025 #N/A
QCS9075 11/26/2024 11/26/2024
QCS9075M 1/16/2025 6/27/2025
36 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 7 of 14
Family Earliest Worldwide order identified Earliest U.S. order identified in
Designation in Qualcomm’s financial records Qualcomm’s financial records
QCS9100M 9/1/2024 #N/A
QMB415 12/22/2025 #N/A
QMB715 1/4/2026 #N/A
QRB3165 2/26/2024 #N/A
QRB3165N 2/26/2024 #N/A
QRB4210 8/2/2021 #N/A
QRB5165 5/25/2020 1/20/2021
QRB5165M 6/3/2021 8/28/2021
QRB5165N 4/29/2021 4/29/2021
QSIP7180 1/8/2020 2/25/2020
QSIP7180P 4/2/2020 #N/A
QSM8250 8/8/2019 1/19/2020
SA4150P 3/8/2021 11/30/2021
SA6145P 5/1/2019 9/30/2019
SA6150P 5/1/2019 9/30/2019
SA6155P 10/15/2018 10/15/2018
SA7255P 7/17/2023 10/15/2025
SA7775P 1/23/2025 #N/A
SA8150P 5/21/2019 7/31/2020
SA8155P 10/4/2018 10/4/2018
SA8195P 4/15/2019 5/15/2020
SA8255P 10/13/2022 #N/A
SA8295P 11/17/2020 12/1/2020
SA8295PS 9/23/2022 #N/A
SA8530P 9/29/2020 4/23/2021
SA8540P 9/28/2020 12/1/2020
SA8620P 10/17/2023 #N/A
SA8650P 7/25/2022 6/26/2025
37 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 8 of 14
Family Earliest Worldwide order identified Earliest U.S. order identified in
Designation in Qualcomm’s financial records Qualcomm’s financial records
SA8775P 8/25/2024 #N/A
SC7180 1/28/2020 #N/A
SC7180P 1/19/2021 #N/A
SC7280 5/4/2021 5/4/2021
SC8180X 10/25/2018 1/11/2019
SC8180XP 7/18/2019 9/10/2019
SC8280XP 10/15/2020 12/15/2020
SDA660 5/2/2017 7/11/2017
SDA670 4/18/2018 #N/A
SDA845 8/22/2017 8/22/2017
SDM630 1/12/2017 5/11/2017
SDM632 3/16/2018 4/6/2018
SDM660 1/3/2017 4/11/2017
SDM670 12/13/2017 2/4/2018
SDM710 2/11/2018 4/4/2018
SDM712 11/1/2018 9/27/2020
SDM845 3/7/2017 5/11/2017
SDM850 11/28/2017 12/14/2017
SG4150P 8/31/2022 #N/A
SG4250P 8/14/2024 #N/A
SG6150 1/5/2024 #N/A
SG6150P 6/12/2024 6/12/2024
SG6275P 3/2/2025 #N/A
SG8175P 8/24/2021 #N/A
SG8275P 9/27/2023 #N/A
SG8350P 10/29/2024 #N/A
SM4250 1/9/2020 4/29/2020
SM4350 7/15/2020 3/4/2021
38 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 9 of 14
Family Earliest Worldwide order identified Earliest U.S. order identified in
Designation in Qualcomm’s financial records Qualcomm’s financial records
SM4375 6/30/2022 #N/A
SM4450 11/28/2022 7/20/2023
SM4450P 9/30/2024 #N/A
SM4635 3/7/2024 #N/A
SM6115 1/9/2020 4/22/2020
SM6115P 8/24/2022 #N/A
SM6125 1/28/2019 6/6/2019
SM6150 7/12/2018 8/30/2018
SM6225 2/28/2021 #N/A
SM6350 3/19/2020 3/27/2023
SM6370 2/7/2024 #N/A
SM6375 3/15/2021 9/21/2021
SM6435 6/4/2025 #N/A
SM6450 3/31/2022 4/10/2023
SM6450P 8/17/2023 #N/A
SM6475 4/25/2024 #N/A
SM6475Q 6/18/2025 #N/A
SM6650 6/12/2024 2/3/2025
SM6650P 7/28/2025 #N/A
SM7125 9/19/2019 4/13/2020
SM7150 10/18/2018 #N/A
SM7150P 11/19/2019 #N/A
SM7225 3/4/2020 2/1/2021
SM7250 5/28/2019 10/10/2019
SM7315 4/5/2021 #N/A
SM7325 1/3/2021 4/30/2021
SM7425 11/17/2022 #N/A
SM7435 3/13/2023 #N/A
39 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 10 of 14
Family Earliest Worldwide order identified Earliest U.S. order identified in
Designation in Qualcomm’s financial records Qualcomm’s financial records
SM7435P 11/27/2023 #N/A
SM7450 11/1/2021 2/23/2022
SM7475 8/15/2022 #N/A
SM7550 5/15/2023 #N/A
SM7550P 11/12/2024 #N/A
SM7635 4/11/2024 2/3/2025
SM7635P 5/13/2025 #N/A
SM7675 8/21/2023 #N/A
SM7675P 2/18/2024 #N/A
SM7750 11/3/2024 5/30/2025
SM7750P 4/22/2025 #N/A
SM7775 11/27/2025 #N/A
SM8150 4/23/2018 11/12/2018
SM8150P 11/22/2018 5/29/2019
SM8250 3/20/2019 6/14/2019
SM8325 1/25/2021 2/24/2022
SM8325P 1/8/2021 #N/A
SM8350 1/20/2020 7/16/2020
SM8350P 6/2/2020 2/17/2021
SM8415 1/24/2022 #N/A
SM8425 1/24/2022 #N/A
SM8450 3/2/2021 8/5/2021
SM8450P 3/16/2021 6/22/2021
SM8475 8/25/2021 5/29/2022
SM8475P 11/22/2022 #N/A
SM8550 2/23/2022 4/26/2022
SM8550P 7/25/2022 10/28/2022
SM8635 9/27/2023 #N/A
40 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 11 of 14
Family Earliest Worldwide order identified Earliest U.S. order identified in
Designation in Qualcomm’s financial records Qualcomm’s financial records
SM8635P 12/20/2023 #N/A
SM8650 2/13/2023 6/22/2023
SM8650P 6/20/2023 11/1/2023
SM8650Q 12/23/2024 #N/A
SM8735 9/24/2024 11/17/2025
SM8735P 3/25/2025 #N/A
SRV1L 5/16/2023 #N/A
SRV1M 8/25/2024 #N/A
SXR1010P 11/13/2023 11/13/2023
SXR2130P 7/25/2019 8/2/2019
SXR2150P 4/20/2021 4/20/2021
SXR2155P 6/30/2021 #N/A
SXR2230P 7/29/2022 12/8/2022
SXR2250P 3/26/2024 4/17/2024
SXR2330P 7/11/2024 #N/A
SXR2350P 7/26/2024 9/10/2025
TPMPSP1393 3/8/2020 #N/A
TPMPSP1518 4/20/2021 10/28/2021
TPNSP1593 10/19/2020 #N/A
Further, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), an answer to non-
objectionable portions of this Interrogatory may be derived and/or ascertained from Qualcomm’s
marketing materials, including some that are publicly accessible, for certain Accused Products
available at QCREDSTONE_0138281 – QCREDSTONE_0138282, QCREDSTONE_0138283 –
QCREDSTONE_0138284, QCREDSTONE_0138285 – QCREDSTONE_0138286,
QCREDSTONE_0138287 – QCREDSTONE_0138288, QCREDSTONE_0138289 –
QCREDSTONE_0138290, QCREDSTONE_0138291 – QCREDSTONE_0138292,
41 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 12 of 14
QCREDSTONE_0138293 – QCREDSTONE_0138294, QCREDSTONE_0138295 –
QCREDSTONE_0138296, QCREDSTONE_0138297 – QCREDSTONE_0138298,
QCREDSTONE_0138299 – QCREDSTONE_0138300, QCREDSTONE_0138301 –
QCREDSTONE_0138303, QCREDSTONE_0138304 – QCREDSTONE_0138306,
QCREDSTONE_0138307 – QCREDSTONE_0138308, QCREDSTONE_0138309 –
QCREDSTONE_0138310, QCREDSTONE_0138311 – QCREDSTONE_0138409,
QCREDSTONE_0138410 – QCREDSTONE_0138411, QCREDSTONE_0138412 –
QCREDSTONE_0138413, QCREDSTONE_0138414 – QCREDSTONE_0138415,
QCREDSTONE_0138416 – QCREDSTONE_0138418, QCREDSTONE_0138419 –
QCREDSTONE_0138420, QCREDSTONE_0145770 – QCREDSTONE_0145785,
QCREDSTONE_0145786 – QCREDSTONE_0145804, QCREDSTONE_0145805 –
QCREDSTONE_0145823, QCREDSTONE_0145824 – QCREDSTONE_0145842,
QCREDSTONE_0145843 – QCREDSTONE_0145861, QCREDSTONE_0145862 –
QCREDSTONE_0145880, QCREDSTONE_0145881 – QCREDSTONE_0145907,
QCREDSTONE_0145908 – QCREDSTONE_0146026, QCREDSTONE_0146027 –
QCREDSTONE_0146043, QCREDSTONE_0146044 – QCREDSTONE_0146115,
QCREDSTONE_0146116 – QCREDSTONE_0146129, QCREDSTONE_0146130 –
QCREDSTONE_0146247, QCREDSTONE_0146248 – QCREDSTONE_0146365,
QCREDSTONE_0146366 – QCREDSTONE_0146476, QCREDSTONE_0146477 –
QCREDSTONE_0146587, QCREDSTONE_0146588 – QCREDSTONE_0146703,
QCREDSTONE_0146704 – QCREDSTONE_0146814, QCREDSTONE_0146815 –
QCREDSTONE_0146896, QCREDSTONE_0146897 – QCREDSTONE_0146898,
QCREDSTONE_0146899 – QCREDSTONE_0146900, QCREDSTONE_0146901 –
42 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 13 of 14
QCREDSTONE_0147011, QCREDSTONE_0147012 – QCREDSTONE_0147013,
QCREDSTONE_0147014 – QCREDSTONE_0147015, QCREDSTONE_0147016 –
QCREDSTONE_0147024, QCREDSTONE_0147025 – QCREDSTONE_0147039,
QCREDSTONE_0147040 – QCREDSTONE_0147046, QCREDSTONE_0147047 –
QCREDSTONE_0147053, QCREDSTONE_0147054 – QCREDSTONE_0147094,
QCREDSTONE_0147095 – QCREDSTONE_0147096, QCREDSTONE_0147097 –
QCREDSTONE_0147098, QCREDSTONE_0147099 – QCREDSTONE_0147120,
QCREDSTONE_0147121 – QCREDSTONE_0147142, QCREDSTONE_0147143 –
QCREDSTONE_0147175, QCREDSTONE_0138430 – QCREDSTONE_0138433; the burden of
deriving or ascertaining an answer from these materials is substantially the same for either party.
To the extent Redstone contends that non-objectionable portions of this Interrogatory seek
anything additional, Qualcomm is willing to discuss Redstone’s contention.
Qualcomm’s investigation remains ongoing, and Qualcomm reserves the right to amend or
supplement the foregoing.
INTERROGATORY NO. 4:
Describe in detail your awareness of the Asserted Patent, including when you first became
aware of the Asserted Patent and the actions you have taken as a result of your awareness of the
Asserted Patent.
SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 AMENDED RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 4:
Qualcomm hereby incorporates by reference its General Objections, its Objections to
Definitions, and its Objections to Instructions above as if fully set forth herein.
Qualcomm objects to the phrases “awareness,” “aware,” and “actions you have taken as a
43 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 62-8 Filed 06/04/26 Page 14 of 14
March 6, 2026 Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Richard S. Zembek
Richard S. Zembek
Texas State Bar No. 00797726
NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
1550 Lamar Street, Suite 2000
Houston, Texas 77010-4106
richard.zembek@nortonrosefulbright.com
Tel: (713) 651-5151
Fax: (713) 651-5246
Eric C. Green
Texas State Bar No. 24069824
Brett A. McKean
Texas State Bar No. 24057994
NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 1100
Austin, Texas 78701-4255
eric.green@nortonrosefulbright.com
brett.mckean@nortonrosefulbright.com
Tel: (512) 536-3094
Fax: (512) 536-4598
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED AND
QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served on counsel of
record on March 6, 2026 by e-mail.
/s/ Eric C. Green
Eric C. Green
136 CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY