Atanasoff v. Bradford — Entry #37: ORDER Remanding case to state court
Case: Atanasoff v. Bradford nvd · 2:23-cv-00358
filed March 07, 2023
What this document is
Docket entry #37 · filed June 29, 2023
ORDER Remanding case to state court. Accordingly, it is further ordered that the following outstanding motions are moot: Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 10 ); Motion to Remand (ECF No. 11 ); Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26 ); Motion to Stay (ECF No. 27 ); Motion for Leave to File Document (ECF No. 31 ); Second Motion for Leave to File Document (ECF No. 35 ). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 6/29/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: certified copy of order and docket sheet mailed to state court - RGDG)
Who is involved
- Atanasoff
- Bradford
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CleanSpark: its name “CleanSpark, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Thomas L. Wood and Nominal Defendant Cleanspark, Inc. 7 8 UNITED…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 26, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
2 page(s), 2,124 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 37 Filed 06/29/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
ERIC ATANASOFF, Derivatively on Case No. 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW
5 behalf of Nominal Defendant
CleanSpark, Inc., ORDER
6
Plaintiff,
7 v.
8 ZACHARY K. BRADFORD, S.
MATTHEW SCHULTZ, LARRY
9 MCNEIL, THOMAS L. WOOD, and
ROGER P. BEYNON,
10
Defendants,
11
and
12
CLEANSPARK INC.,
13
Nominal Defendant.
14
15
16
17 On June 28, 2023, Defendant S. Mathew Shultz (“Shultz”) withdrew his
18 Petition for Removal to Federal Court (ECF No. 1), filed on March 7, 2023. (ECF
19 No. 36). Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff (“Atanasoff”), derivatively on behalf of CleanSpark,
20 Inc. (“CleanSpark”) previously filed a Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 11).
21 The Court therefore hereby remands this case to the Clark County District
22 Court for all further proceedings.
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
1
Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 37 Filed 06/29/23 Page 2 of 2
1 Accordingly, it is further ordered that the following outstanding motions
2 are moot: Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 10); Motion to Remand (ECF No. 11);
3 Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26); Motion to Stay (ECF No. 27); Motion for Leave to
4 File Document (ECF No. 31); Second Motion for Leave to File Document (ECF No.
5 35).
6 The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
7
8 DATED THIS 29th day of June 2023.
9
10
11
ANNE R. TRAUM
12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
