Langer, et al. v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc., et al. — Entry #2: SCHEDULE NOTICE
Case: Langer, et al. v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc., et al. ca9 · 26-2910
filed May 07, 2026
What this document is
Docket entry #2 · filed May 07, 2026
SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 6/15/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/24/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/23/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 5/14/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 5/12/2026. For appeal no. 26-2910, 2:23-cv-00470-RFB-DJA. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/07/2026 11:55 AM]
Who is involved
- MARATHON DIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC. [tracked: Marathon Digital]
- FREDERICK G. THIEL
- HUGH J. GALLAGHER
- JACKS WAY, LLC
- MARY BARIDA
- MERRICK OKAMOTO
- SIMEON SALZMAN
- TODD LANGER
Why we have it
We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Marathon Digital (listed as “MARATHON DIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC.”). We checked the full party list on September 09, 2026 and confirmed the match.
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved September 09, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 5,141 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case: 26-2910, 05/07/2026, DktEntry: 2.1, Page 1 of 3
Office of the Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box 193939
San Francisco, California 94119-3939
415-355-8000 FILED
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court MAY 7 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
DOCKETING NOTICE
Docket Number: 26-2910
Originating Case Number: 2:23-cv-00470-RFB-DJA
Short Title: Langer, et al. v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc., et al.
Dear Appellant/Counsel
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has received a copy of your
notice of appeal and assigned the docket number above to your case.
Please include this docket number on every filing you submit and in any communication
you have with the court about this case. If you are ordering any transcript from the lower
court, please give the docket number to the court reporter right away.
Motions filed with the notice of appeal are not transferred to this court. You need to
separately file on this court’s docket any motion that seeks relief from this court.
You must file a Disclosure Statement (Form 34) within 14 days of this notice if your
case: (1) involves a corporation, association, joint venture, partnership, limited liability
company, or similar entity; (2) is a bankruptcy case; (3) is a criminal case with an
organizational victim; or (4) involves review of state court proceedings. See Ninth Circuit
Rule 26-1.1.
Failure to timely file the opening brief may also result in your case being dismissed.
Please read the enclosed materials carefully.
Case: 26-2910, 05/07/2026, DktEntry: 2.1, Page 2 of 3
Office of the Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box 193939
San Francisco, California 94119-3939
415-355-8000
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
TIME SCHEDULE ORDER
Docket Number: 26-2910
Originating Case Number: 2:23-cv-00470-RFB-DJA
Case Title: Langer, et al. v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc., et al.
5/12/2026
Todd Langer Mediation Questionnaire due
Mary Barida Mediation Questionnaire due
Jacks Way, LLC Mediation Questionnaire due
5/14/2026
Mary Barida Appeal Transcript Order Due
Todd Langer Appeal Transcript Order Due
Jacks Way, LLC Appeal Transcript Order Due
6/15/2026
Mary Barida Appeal Transcript Due
Jacks Way, LLC Appeal Transcript Due
Todd Langer Appeal Transcript Due
7/23/2026
Todd Langer Appeal Opening Brief Due
Mary Barida Appeal Opening Brief Due
Jacks Way, LLC Appeal Opening Brief Due
Case: 26-2910, 05/07/2026, DktEntry: 2.1, Page 3 of 3
8/24/2026
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. Appeal Answering Brief Due
Hugh J. Gallagher Appeal Answering Brief Due
Frederick G. Thiel Appeal Answering Brief Due
Merrick Okamoto Appeal Answering Brief Due
Simeon Salzman Appeal Answering Brief Due
If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, cross-
designate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3. If there were no reported hearings,
the transcript deadlines do not apply.
The optional reply may be filed within 21 days of service of the answering brief. See
Fed. R. App. P. 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
Mediation Questionnaire is available here. More information about the Mediation
Program is available here.
If the opening brief is not filed by the deadline, the court may dismiss this case. See
9th Cir. R. 42-1.