Car-Freshner Corporation v. Meta Platforms, Inc. — Entry #197
Case: Car-Freshner Corporation v. Meta Platforms, Inc. nynd · 5:22-cv-01305
filed December 06, 2022
What this document is
Docket entry #197 · filed December 16, 2024
Who is involved
- Car-Freshner Corporation
- Julius Samann LTD
- Meta Platforms, Inc.
- Randolph F. Treece
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CleanSpark: its project “Washington” appears in a filing in this case.
…(2d Cir. 2023) (quoting Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945)) (quotation marks omitted)…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 27, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 2,677 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 5:22-cv-01305-MAD-ML Document 197 Filed 12/16/24 Page 1 of 1
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP 3 Times Square
ktslaw.com New York, NY 10036
H. Forrest Flemming, III
December 16, 2024 direct dial 404 532 6869
FFlemming@ktslaw.com
VIA ECF
Hon. Miroslav Lovric
U.S. Magistrate Judge
U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York
Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse
15 Henry Street
Binghamton, New York 13261-7346
Re: Car-Freshner Corp., et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 5:22-cv-1305 (MAD/ML)
Dear Magistrate Judge Lovric:
I write jointly on behalf of Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) and Plaintiffs Car-
Freshner Corporation and Julius Sämann, Ltd. to request an additional one-week extension of
interim discovery deadlines while the parties finalize a settlement agreement. Since the parties
requested the first one-week extension of deadlines on December 4, 2024 (Dkt. No 194), the
parties have made great progress in settlement negotiations and are working to finalize the
agreement. The parties presently have a December 16 deadline to comply with the Court’s
November 25 Order (Dkt. Nos. 192, 195) and a December 18 deadline to submit status reports
(Dkt. No. 195). Meta also has a December 19 deadline to serve responses and objections to
Plaintiffs’ sixth set of document requests (Dkt. No. 195).
The parties jointly request that the Court extend the foregoing deadlines by one week.
Good cause exists for this brief extension because it will allow the parties to focus their resources
on finalizing settlement of this action without Court involvement.
The parties thank the Court for its consideration of this request.
Best regards,
/s/ H. Forrest Flemming III
H. Forrest Flemming III
cc: All Counsel of Record, via ECF
ANCHORAGE ATLANTA AUGUSTA BEIJING CHARLOTTE CHICAGO DALLAS DENVER HOUSTON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PHOENIX RALEIGH
SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE SHANGHAI SILICON VALLEY STOCKHOLM TOKYO WALNUT CREEK WASHINGTON WINSTON-SALEM