jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved October 03, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at the filing system ↗

Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. Foundry Digital LLC — Entry #148

Case: Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. Foundry Digital LLC txwd · 7:25-cv-00567

filed December 12, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #148 · filed September 01, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Parties

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Riot (listed as “Riot Platforms, Inc.”). We checked the full party list on September 02, 2026 and confirmed the match.

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 03, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172879815/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172879815.148.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Retrieved
2026-10-03 06:46:15.991625-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
177254
SHA-256
68a31aa79c71f273bd177b2ebec4b8851d131dcc7219724f81f7962764f71384

Document text

1 page(s), 2,145 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 7:25-cv-00567-DC-DTG                Document 148          Filed 08/31/26        Page 1 of 1


                            IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                  MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION

MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LTD.,                             §
KEY PATENT INOVVATIONS LTD.,                          §
  Plaintiff,                                          §
                                                      §
v.                                                    §            NO.      MO:25-CV-00567
                                                      §
FOUNDRY DIGITAL LLC, FORTITUDE                        §
MINING, LLC, RIOT PLATFORMS, INC.,                    §
CIPHER DIGITAL INC. F/K/A/ CIPHER                     §
MINING INC.,                                          §
  Defendants.                                         §

                                                  ORDER

        Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant FOUNDRY

DIGITAL, LLC (Doc. 145) filed August 28, 2026, without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Id.). Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss an action

without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves an answer or a

motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Defendant has not served an answer or

a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s notice is therefore “self-effectuating and terminates the case

in and of itself; no order or other action of the district court is required.” In re Amerijet Int’l, Inc., 785

F.3d 967, 973 (5th Cir. 2015), as revised (May 15, 2015). This dismissal is without prejudice pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(B) This Dismissal only applies to Defendant FOUNDRY

DIGITAL, LLC.

        It is so ORDERED.

        SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2026.


                                                  DAVID COUNTS
                                                  UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE