Atanasoff v. Bradford — Entry #20: ORDER granting ECF No
Case: Atanasoff v. Bradford nvd · 2:23-cv-00358
filed March 07, 2023
What this document is
Docket entry #20 · filed April 17, 2023
ORDER granting ECF No. 18 Stipulation : Reply to ECF No. 15 Response re ECF No. 10 Motion to Consolidate due by 4/24/2023. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 4/17/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Who is involved
- Atanasoff
- Bradford
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- CleanSpark: its name “CleanSpark, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Thomas L. Wood and Nominal Defendant Cleanspark, Inc. 7 8 UNITED…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 26, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 5,772 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 20 Filed 04/17/23 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
ERIC ATANASOFF, Derivatively on Behalf of Case No.: 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW
11 CLEANSPARK, INC.,
Plaintiff, (Removal from District Court, Clark County,
12 Nevada, Case No. A-23-866492-C)
v.
13
14 ZACHARY K. BRADFORD, S. MATTHEW ORDER APPROVING
SCHULTZ, ROGER P. BEYNON, LARRY
15 MCNEILL, and THOMAS L. WOOD, JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO
16 Defendants, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
17 -and-
18
CLEANSPARK, INC., a Nevada Corporation,
19
Nominal Defendant.
20
21 Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff
22 CleanSpark, Inc. (“CleanSpark”) and Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, S. Matthew Schultz,
23 Larry McNeill, Thomas L. Wood, Roger P. Beynon (the “Individual Defendants”), and Nominal
24 Defendant CleanSpark (together with the Individual Defendants, “Defendants”) (collectively,
25 with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby enter into the
26 following joint stipulation and proposed order:
27 WHEREAS, on March 1, 2023, Plaintiff filed a shareholder derivative complaint (the
28 “Complaint”) on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff CleanSpark in the Eighth Judicial District Court of
1
144631383.1
Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 20 Filed 04/17/23 Page 2 of 3
1 the State of Nevada in and for Clark County (the “State Court”), captioned Atanasoff v.
2 Bradford, et al., Case No. A-23-866492-C (this “Action”); and
3 WHEREAS, on March 7, 2023, the Defendant S. Matthew Schultz filed a Petition for
4 Removal (ECF No. 1) and Notice of Removal, removing this Action from State Court to the
5 United States District Court for the District of Nevada; and
6 WHEREAS, on March 24, 2023, the Individual Defendants filed a Motion to
7 Consolidate, asking the Court to consolidate this Action into the consolidated shareholder
8 derivative action pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, In re
9 CleanSpark, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-01181-GMN-BNW (the “Motion to
10 Consolidate”) (ECF No. 10); and
11 WHEREAS, on April 4, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Motion to Remand and for Attorney’s
12 Fees and Costs, which has been noticed for consideration by the Court in the normal course (the
13 “Motion to Remand”); and
14 WHEREAS, on April 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to
15 Consolidate (“Opposition”);
16 WHEREAS, to ensure judicial and party economy, the Parties agree to extend the
17 deadline for Defendants to reply to the Opposition until on or before April 24, 2023.
18 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the
19 Parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, as
20 follows:
21 1. Defendants’ deadline to reply to the Opposition is extended until on or before
22 April 24, 2023.
23 2. Other than as agreed herein, the Parties reserve all rights.
24 ///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
2
144631383.1
=
Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 20 Filed 04/17/23 Page 3 of 3
1 DATED: April 13, 2023 DATED: April 13, 2023
2 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.
3
/s/ Colleen E. McCarty /s/John P. Aldrich
4 MARK J. CONNOT (10010) JOHN P. ALDRICH (6877)
COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186) CATHERINE HERNANDEZ (8410)
5 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700 7866 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89135 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
6 mconnot@foxrothschild.com jaldrich@johnaldrichlawfirm.com
7 cmcarty@foxrothschild.com chernandez@johnaldrichlawfirm.com
Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Plaintiffs
8
THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C.
9 James M. Ficaro
Pro Hac Vice application pending, Attorney
10
has complied with L.R. IA 11-2
11 200 Barr Harbor Dr.
West Conshohocken, PA
12 Telephone: (610) 225-0206
jmf@weiserlawfirm.com
13 Counsel for Plaintiff Travis France
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17 _____________________________________
Anne R. Traum
18 United States District Court Judge
19
DATED: April 17, 2023
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
144631383.1
