jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved October 26, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Smith v. Bradford — Entry #14: ORDER Granting 11 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to 5 Motion to Consolidate Cases

Case: Smith v. Bradford nvd · 2:23-cv-00445

filed March 23, 2023

What this document is

Docket entry #14 · filed April 16, 2023

ORDER Granting 11 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to 5 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Responses due by 4/17/2023. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/16/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because a company we track is a party: CleanSpark (listed as “Cleanspark,Inc”). We checked the full party list on September 28, 2026 and confirmed the match.

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 26, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.161419/gov.uscourts.nvd.161419.14.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2023-04-06 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-10-26 06:50:14.231439-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
184766
SHA-256
5c355411e5e5a96c8348244a0b93f1d95f372a36fb411c8e0e7369c74f3eb1bd

Document text

3 page(s), 4,978 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 2:23-cv-00445-GMN-BNW Document 14 Filed 04/16/23 Page 1 of 3


 1    MARK J. CONNOT (10010)
      COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186)
 2    FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
      1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700
 3    Las Vegas, NV 89135
      Telephone: 702.262.6899
 4    Facsimile: 702.597.5503
      mconnot@foxrothschild.com
 5    cmccarty@foxrothschild.com
      Counsel for Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, Lori L. Love,
 6    S. Matthew Schultz, Robert P. Beynon, Larry McNeill, and
      Thomas L. Wood, and Nominal Defendant Cleanspark, Inc.
 7

 8                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 9                                       DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
      BRANDON SMITH, Derivatively on Behalf               Case No.: 2:23-cv-00445-GMN-BNW
11    of CLEANSPARK, INC.,
                       Plaintiff,                         (Removal from District Court, Clark County,
12                                                        Nevada, Case No. A-23-866051-C)
      v.
13

14    ZACHARY K. BRADFORD, LORI L. LOVE,                  JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
      S. MATTHEW SCHULTZ, LARRY                           ADJOURNING TIME TO RESPOND
15    MCNEILL, THOMAS L. WOOD, and                        TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
      ROGER P. BEYNON,
16

17                           Defendants,
18
      -and-
19
      CLEANSPARK, INC., a Nevada Corporation,
20
                             Nominal Defendant.
21

22            Plaintiff Brandon Smith (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff
23    CleanSpark, Inc. (“CleanSpark”) and Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, Lori L. Love, S.
24    Matthew Schultz, Larry McNeill, Thomas L. Wood, Roger P. Beynon (the “Individual
25    Defendants”), and Nominal Defendant CleanSpark (together with the Individual Defendants,
26    “Defendants”) (collectively, with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned
27    counsel, hereby enter into the following stipulation and proposed order:
28    ///
                                                      1
      144448618.1


     Case 2:23-cv-00445-GMN-BNW Document 14 Filed 04/16/23 Page 2 of 3


 1            WHEREAS, on February 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed a shareholder derivative complaint (the

 2    “Complaint”) on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff CleanSpark in the Eighth Judicial District Court of

 3    the State of Nevada in and for Clark County (the “State Court”), captioned Smith v. Bradford, et

 4    al., Case No. A-23-866051-C (this “Action”); and

 5            WHEREAS, on March 23, 2023, the Individual Defendants filed a Petition for Removal

 6    and Notice of Removal (Dkt. No. 1), removing this Action from State Court to the United States

 7    District Court for the District of Nevada; and

 8            WHEREAS, on March 24, 2023, the Individual Defendants filed a Motion to

 9    Consolidate (Dkt. No. 5) asking the Court to consolidate this Action into the consolidated

10    shareholder derivative action pending in the United States District Court for the District of

11    Nevada, In re CleanSpark, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-01181-GMN-BNW (the

12    “Motion to Consolidate”); and

13            WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to oppose the Motion

14    to Consolidate (Dkt. No. 6) until on or before April 17, 2023.

15            NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the Parties

16    hereto, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

17            1.     Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose the Motion to Consolidate is extended until on or

18    before April 17, 2023.

19            2.     Other than as agreed herein, the Parties reserve all rights.

20

21                                      [Signatures on following page]

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
                                                       2
      144448618.1


     Case 2:23-cv-00445-GMN-BNW Document 14 Filed 04/16/23 Page 3 of 3


 1
      DATED: April 6, 2023                        DATED: April 6, 2023
 2
      FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP                          MUEHLBAUER LAW OFFICE, LTD.
 3

 4    /s/Colleen E. McCarty                       /s/Andrew R. Muehlbauer
      MARK J. CONNOT (10010)                      ANDREW R. MUEHLBAUER
 5    COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186)                  7915 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 104
      1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700         Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
 6    Las Vegas, NV 89135                         andrew@mlolegal.com
      mconnot@foxrothschild.com                   Counsel for Plaintiff
 7
      cmcarty@foxrothschild.com
 8    Counsel for Defendants

 9    IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
      _____________________________________
11
      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
      DATED: ______________________
              April 16, 2023
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
                                              3
      144448618.1