Giuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.Musk — Entry #592: USCA Case Number 26-4928 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for 112 USCA Case Number
Case: Giuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.Musk cand · 3:22-cv-05937
filed October 10, 2022
What this document is
Docket entry #592 · filed July 31, 2026
USCA Case Number 26-4928 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for 112 USCA Case Number. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2026) (Entered: 08/03/2026)
Who is involved
- Alex Spiro
- Brian Belgrave
- Elon Musk
- Giuseppe Pampena
- John C. Coates
- John Garrett
- Mohammed Samara
- Nancy Price
- Steve Garrett
- Teacher Retirement System of Texas
- The Twitter Investor Group
- X CORP.
- Yoel Roth
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its name “Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Bitcoin to raise money, firms like Marathon Digital Holdings Inc. are selling Bitcoin call options…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 02, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 4,452 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 592 Filed 07/31/26 Page 1 of 3
Office of the Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box 193939
San Francisco, California 94119-3939
415-355-8000 FILED
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court JUL 31 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
DOCKETING NOTICE
Docket Number: 26-4928
Originating Case Number: 3:22-cv-05937-CRB
Short Title: Pampena, et al. v. Musk
Dear Appellant/Counsel
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has received a copy of your
notice of appeal and assigned the docket number above to your case.
Please include this docket number on every filing you submit and in any communication
you have with the court about this case. If you are ordering any transcript from the lower
court, please give the docket number to the court reporter right away.
Motions filed with the notice of appeal are not transferred to this court. You need to
separately file on this court’s docket any motion that seeks relief from this court.
You must file a Disclosure Statement (Form 34) within 14 days of this notice if your
case: (1) involves a corporation, association, joint venture, partnership, limited liability
company, or similar entity; (2) is a bankruptcy case; (3) is a criminal case with an
organizational victim; or (4) involves review of state court proceedings. See Ninth Circuit
Rule 26-1.1.
Failure to timely file the opening brief may also result in your case being dismissed.
Please read the enclosed materials carefully.
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 592 Filed 07/31/26 Page 2 of 3
Office of the Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box 193939
San Francisco, California 94119-3939
415-355-8000
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
TIME SCHEDULE ORDER
Docket Number: 26-4928
Originating Case Number: 3:22-cv-05937-CRB
Case Title: Pampena, et al. v. Musk
8/5/2026
Elon Musk Mediation Questionnaire due
8/13/2026
Elon Musk Appeal Transcript Order Due
9/14/2026
Elon Musk Appeal Transcript Due
10/22/2026
Elon Musk Appeal Opening Brief Due
11/23/2026
John Garrett Appeal Answering Brief Due
Brian Belgrave Appeal Answering Brief Due
Twitter Investor Group Appeal Answering Brief Due
Nancy Price Appeal Answering Brief Due
Giuseppe Pampena Appeal Answering Brief Due
Steve Garrett Appeal Answering Brief Due
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 592 Filed 07/31/26 Page 3 of 3
If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, cross-
designate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3. If there were no reported hearings,
the transcript deadlines do not apply.
The optional reply may be filed within 21 days of service of the answering brief. See
Fed. R. App. P. 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
Mediation Questionnaire is available here. More information about the Mediation
Program is available here.
If the opening brief is not filed by the deadline, the court may dismiss this case. See
9th Cir. R. 42-1.
