NETWORK RACING PTY LTD. v. IREN LIMITED — Entry #110: ORDER that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' second amended complaint is GRANTED
Case: NETWORK RACING PTY LTD. v. IREN LIMITED njd · 2:22-cv-07273
filed December 14, 2022
What this document is
Docket entry #110 · filed February 18, 2026
ORDER that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' second amended complaint is GRANTED; Plaintiffs' second amended complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 2/18/2026. (mj) (Entered: 02/18/2026)
Who is involved
- IREN LIMITED [tracked: IREN]
- BELINDA NUCIFORA
- CANACCORD GENUITY LLC
- CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO.
- CHRISTOPHER GUZOWSKI
- CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS LLC
- COMPASS POINT RESEARCH & TRADING, LLC
- DANIEL ROBERTS
- DAVID BARTHOLOMEW
- DE STOOP INVESTMENTS PTY LTD.
- ERIK KEYSER
- GALAXY DIGITAL PARTNERS LLC
- J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC
- LRJ SUPERANNUATION FUND
- MACQUARIE CAPITAL (USA), INC.
- MICHAEL ALFRED
- NAHI BEAINI
- NETWORK RACING PTY LTD.
- SCOTT STERLING
- WILLIAM ROBERTS
Why we have it
We follow this case because a company we track is a party: IREN (listed as “IREN LIMITED”). We checked the full party list on September 11, 2026 and confirmed the match.
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved September 11, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 1,472 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 2:22-cv-07273-ES-MAH Document 110 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 4097
Not for Publication
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
NETWORK RACING PTY. LTD., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No. 22-7273 (ES) (MAH)
v.
ORDER
IREN LIMITED, et al.,
Defendants.
SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint.
(D.E. No. 83). Having carefully considered the parties’ submissions, and having held oral
argument on February 4, 2026, and for the reasons set forth during oral argument and in the
Court’s oral opinion on record dated February 18, 2026, (D.E. Nos. 107, 108, & 109),
IT IS on this 18th day of February 2026,
ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint is
GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice;
and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case.
s/Esther Salas
Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.