In re Bit Digital, Inc. Securities Litigation — Entry #82: ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION granting (71) Motion for Settlement in case 1:21-cv-00515-ALC
Case: In re Bit Digital, Inc. Securities Litigation nysd · 1:21-cv-00515
filed January 20, 2021
What this document is
Docket entry #82 · filed March 07, 2023
ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION granting (71) Motion for Settlement in case 1:21-cv-00515-ALC. The Court finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation, as set forth in the Notice, is, in all respects, fair and reasonable and the Court approves the Plan of Allocation. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/7/2023) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00515-ALC, 1:21-cv-00721-ALC, 1:21-cv-02262-ALC (ate) (Entered: 03/07/2023)
Who is involved
- Andre Johnson
- Anthony Pauwels
- Bit Digital, Inc.
- Erke Huang
- Joseph Franklin Monkam Nitcheu
- Min Hu
- Zhongxun Yang
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Hut 8: its former name “Hut 8 Mining Corp.” appears in a filing in this case.
…International, Inc; Hive Blockchain Technologies Inc; Hut 8 Mining Corp; HashChain Technology, Inc; MGT Capital Investments…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 31, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 3,452 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:21-cv-00515-ALC Document 82 Filed 03/07/23 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN RE: BIT DIGITAL, INC. 3/7/2023
SECURITIES LITIGATION
Lead Case No. 1:21-cv-00515-ALC
This document relates to:
All Actions
ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION
BLOCK & LEVITON LLP
Jeffrey C. Block
Jacob A. Walker, pro hac vice
Sarah E. Delaney
260 Franklin Street, Suite 1860
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 398-5600
jeff@blockleviton.com
jake@blockleviton.com
sarah@blockleviton.com
Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff and the
Class
Case 1:21-cv-00515-ALC Document 82 Filed 03/07/23 Page 2 of 3
This matter having come before the Court on February 3, 2023, on Lead Plaintiff’s motion
for approval of the Plan of Allocation of the Settlement proceeds in the above-captioned action;
the Court having considered all proceedings and papers filed herein and otherwise being fully
informed in the premises;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
1. This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation of Class
Action Settlement dated October 12, 2022 (ECF No. 68-1) (“Stipulation”), and all capitalized
terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation.
2. Pursuant to and in full compliance with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, this Court hereby finds and concludes that due and adequate notice was directed to all
persons who are Class Members who could be identified with reasonable effort, advising them of
the Plan of Allocation and of their right to object thereto, and a full and fair opportunity was
accorded to all persons and entities who are Class Members to be heard with respect to the Plan of
Allocation.
3. The Court finds and concludes that the formula for the calculation of the claims of
Authorized Claimants which is set forth in the Notice sent to Class Members provides a fair and
reasonable basis upon which to allocate the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund established by
the Stipulation among the Class Members, with due consideration having been given to
administrative convenience and necessity.
4. The Court finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation, as set forth in the Notice,
is, in all respects, fair and reasonable and the Court approves the Plan of Allocation.
SO ORDERED.
2
Case 1:21-cv-00515-ALC Document 82 Filed 03/07/23 Page 3 of 3
DATED: March 7, 2023
Honorable Andrew L. Carter, Jr.
United States District Judge
3
