jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved October 22, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at the filing system ↗

Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. MARA Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) — Entry #83

Case: Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. MARA Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) txwd · 7:25-cv-00222

filed May 12, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #83 · filed March 18, 2026

Proposed Order

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Marathon Digital (listed as “MARA Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.)”). We checked the full party list on September 13, 2026 and confirmed the match.

We bought this filing from PACER (the federal courts’ paid records system) for $0.10 on October 22, 2026; the purchase also placed it in the free RECAP archive for everyone.

URL
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172841950/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172841950.83.1.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP (purchased via PACER)
Published
2026-03-18 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-10-22 00:41:15.208761-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
123223
SHA-256
2a415a585e4ae59908663156d79c06b4ea39d3616ad88a1b23da94996b40cc44

Document text

1 page(s), 1,167 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 7:25-cv-00222-DC-DTG             Document 83-1   Filed 03/18/26   Page 1 of 1


                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                              MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

 MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LTD. AND KEY
 PATENT INNOVATIONS LTD,
                                                  Case No. 7:25-cv-00222-DC-DTG
          Plaintiffs,

 vs

 MARA HOLDINGS, INC.

          Defendant.

                         ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED
                        MOTION TO WITHDRAW ATTORNEYS OF RECORD

         The Court, having considered Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Attorneys of

Record (the “Unopposed Motion”) and, for good cause shown, finds that the Unopposed Motion

should be GRANTED.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Priyata Patel and Anish Desai are hereby withdrawn as

attorneys for Defendant for all purposes.

         SIGNED on the _____ day of ______________ 2026.


                                                    ______________________________
                                                    UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


4936-7234-2681