Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. Foundry Digital LLC — Entry #144

Case: Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. Foundry Digital LLC txwd · 7:25-cv-00567

filed December 12, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #144 · filed August 26, 2026

Order

Who is involved

Riot Platforms, Inc. [tracked: Riot]
Cipher Digital Inc.
Fortitude Mining, LLC
Foundry Digital LLC
Key Patent Innovations Ltd.
Malikie Innovations Ltd.

Why we have it

We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Riot (listed as “Riot Platforms, Inc.”). We checked the full party list on September 02, 2026 and confirmed the match.

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 03, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172879815/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172879815.144.0_1.pdf
Kind: court_filing
Publisher: RECAP
Retrieved: 2026-10-03 06:46:19.230589-04:00
HTTP status: 200
MIME: application/pdf
Bytes: 289536
SHA-256: 249a39fb5ba93b31fb7e7900932845652c5a8d4b52874a04faa9b229f42f751b

Document text

1 page(s), 1,873 characters, read from page images by OCR, so expect some character errors · plain text.

Full text

Case 7:25-cv-00567-DC-DTG Document144 _ Filed 08/24/26 Pagelof1

FILED

AUG 27 2026

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK, U.S. DISTRICY CLERK

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND/ODESSA AND PECOS DIVISIONS By ee
DEPUTY

§

§

§

STANDING ORDER REGARDING FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
AND REDACTED PUBLIC VERSIONS

This Order applies to all patent cases pending before the undersigned. As a public forum,
the Court has a policy of providing to the public full access to documents filed with the Court.
Because parties in patent cases routinely file confidential information, this Order grants leave for
any party in a patent case to file materials containing confidential information under seal. Parties
need not file a separate motion for leave.

The filing party shall file a publicly available, redacted version of any motion or pleading
filed under seal within seven days. The parties need not file redacted versions of exhibits to such
documents. Exhibits that are nonconfidential in their entirety should not be filed under seal at all.
The parties shall coordinate to make sure that the publicly available version redacts information
that any party deems confidential. Redactions should be targeted to redact only that information.
The publicly available version shall not be deemed as agreeing that the redacted information is
confidential.

The Court will enter a sealed order to resolve a motion if either party filed its briefing
under seal. The movant shall email a redacted version of the Court’s sealed order for publication
within seven days after the Court enters the sealed Order. The movant shall email the redacted,
public version to the Court’s law clerk (txwdml_nojudge_chambers_md_judgecounts@txwd.uscourts.gov).

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this2Te day of August, 2026.

~

DAVID COUNTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE