Redstone Logics LLC v. Qualcomm Inc. — Entry #64: MOTION to Stay by Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Technologies, Inc
Case: Redstone Logics LLC v. Qualcomm Inc. txwd · 7:24-cv-00231
filed September 20, 2024
What this document is
Docket entry #64 · filed June 10, 2026
MOTION to Stay by Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: (1) Proposed Order, (2) Declaration of Eric C. Green, (3) Exhibit 1, (4) Exhibit 3, (5) Exhibit 4)(slt)
Who is involved
- Qualcomm Inc.
- Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
- Redstone Logics LLC
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its former name “MARA Holdings, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…... 1 Malikie Innovations LTD. et al v. Mara Holdings INC., No. 7:25-cv-00222-DC-DTG (W.D. Tex. June…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 02, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
2 page(s), 3,065 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 64-2 Filed 06/10/26 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION
REDSTONE LOGICS LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 7:24-cv-00231-ADA
QUALCOMM INC.; QUALCOMM
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants.
DECLARATION OF ERIC C. GREEN
IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSED MOTION TO STAY
I, Eric C. Green, declare as follows:
1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, counsel of
record for Defendants Qualcomm Inc. and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (collectively,
“Qualcomm”) in this action. I am a member of good standing of the Bar of the State of Texas, and
I am admitted to practice before this Court. I make this declaration on my own personal knowledge
of the facts set forth in this Declaration and, if called as a witness, I could and would competently
testify to them.
2. The parties met and conferred on June 1, 2026, counsel for Redstone confirmed
that Redstone opposes a stay pending reexamination.
3. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Order Granting Request for
Ex Parte Reexamination, dated March 6, 2026, excerpted from the prosecution history of U.S.
Patent No. 8,549,339.
4. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of Redstone’s Final Infringement
Contentions, dated August 4, 2025.
1
Case 7:24-cv-00231-ADA Document 64-2 Filed 06/10/26 Page 2 of 2
5. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of a document titled “Ex Parte
Reexamination Filing Data” from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
6. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of excerpts of Advanced Micro
Devices, Inc.’s Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 8,549,339 in In re Patent
of Wolfe, et al., dated December 9, 2025.
7. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of Redstone’s Response to
Qualcomm’s Interrogatory No. 10, excerpted from its Second Supplemental Objections and
Responses to Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-16).
8. Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of Qualcomm’s Response to
Redstone’s Interrogatory No. 3, excerpted from its March 26, 2026 Third Supplemental Objections
and Responses to Redstone’s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-15).
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the above
statements are true and correct.
Executed on the 4th day of June, 2026, in Austin, Texas.
/s/ Eric C. Green
Eric C. Green
2