jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved October 26, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

HOUCK v. EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. — Entry #41: ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case: HOUCK v. EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC. njd · 2:23-cv-04113

filed August 01, 2023

What this document is

Docket entry #41 · filed March 13, 2025

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jamel K. Semper on 3/13/2025. (mxw, ) (Entered: 03/14/2025)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 26, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.njd.515776/gov.uscourts.njd.515776.41.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2025-01-23 00:00:00-05:00
Retrieved
2026-10-26 06:49:55.059092-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
171342
SHA-256
0b631b3a32af7bdbc953cea5e4a53d92a3778860d1e7c5bc2757f73567810261

Document text

2 page(s), 1,686 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 2:23-cv-04113-JKS-MAH      Document 41       Filed 03/13/25   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 733


                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY


  WILLIAM HOUCK, Individually and
  on Behalf of All Others Similarly
  Situated,
                                                Case No. 2:23-cv-04113-JKS-MAH
                            Plaintiff,

                     v.

  EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES, INC.,
  JOSEPH MASTRANGELO, and
  NATHAN KROEKER,

                            Defendants.


                              ORDER OF DISMISSAL

       On November 8, 2024, the Court issued an Opinion (ECF No. 38) and Order

 (ECF No. 39) granting, without prejudice, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

 Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 26).

       On January 23, 2025, Defendants filed a notice requesting the Court enter a

 final judgment of dismissal as Plaintiffs did not make any additional filings during

 the 45 days granted to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs have not responded to

 Defendants' request.

       Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED

 that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed.

                                            1


Case 2:23-cv-04113-JKS-MAH   Document 41   Filed 03/13/25   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 734


   IT IS SO ORDERED.


   DATED: March 13, 2025                   /s/ Jamel K. Semper
                                           _____________________________
                                           The Honorable Jamel K. Semper
                                           United States District Judge


                                      2