Xockets, Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation — Entry #242: Unopposed MOTION to Stay Case by Microsoft Corporation, NVIDIA Corporation
Case: Xockets, Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation txwd · 6:24-cv-00453
filed September 05, 2024
What this document is
Docket entry #242 · filed July 06, 2026
Unopposed MOTION to Stay Case by Microsoft Corporation, NVIDIA Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, Xockets' ITC Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, Notice of Institution of Investigation, # 3 Proposed Order)(Osborn, Mark) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Who is involved
- Microsoft Corporation
- NVIDIA Corporation
- RPX Corporation
- Xockets, Inc.
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its name “Nebius” appears in a filing in this case.
…CoreWeave, Crusoe, IBM Cloud, Lambda and Nebius. Sovereign AI clouds will also provide…
- CoreWeave: its name “CoreWeave” appears in a filing in this case.
…program companies Applied Digital, CoreWeave, Crusoe, IBM Cloud, Lambda and Nebius…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved September 30, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 1,446 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 6:24-cv-00453-LS Document 242-3 Filed 07/06/26 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
XOCKETS, INC.,
Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 6:24-cv-00453-LS
v.
NVIDIA CORPORATION,
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
RPX CORPORATION
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT NVIDIA CORPORATION AND MICROSOFT
CORPORATIONS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND MOTION FOR STAY
PENDING FINAL RESOLUTION OF PARALLEL ITC INVESTIGATION
Before the Court is Defendants NVIDIA Corporation and Microsoft Corporation’s
(collectively, “Defendants”) Unopposed Motion to Lift Stay and Motion for Stay Pending Final
Resolution of Parallel ITC Investigation (“Motion”). The Court finds that good cause exists to
grant Defendants’ Motion. This case is hereby STAYED in its entirety, pending final resolution
of the parallel ITC investigation, including any appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED and ENTERED on __________________.
HON. LEON SCHYDLOWER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE