Defendants ask for dismissal with prejudice if plaintiffs default
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Marathon and the defendants ask the court to dismiss both actions with prejudice if plaintiffs miss the May 31, 2022 deadline. In the alternative, they ask the court to require a consolidated complaint within 7 days and a response to any renewed motion to dismiss within 21 days.
Source (primary)
Bernard v. Theil — Entry #39: RESPONSE to 36 Motion by Defendants Georges Antoun, Kevin Denuccio, Sarita James, Jay Leupp, Merrick D (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-02)Live source ↗
Quote: “request that the Court dismiss plaintiffs' actions with prejudice to plaintiffs re-filing new actions asserting the claims asserted here in this Court or any other Court”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Bernard v. Theil — Entry #39: RESPONSE to 36 Motion by Defendants Georges Antoun, Kevin Denuccio, Sarita James, Jay Leupp, Merrick D
Quote: “request that the Court dismiss plaintiffs' actions with prejudice to plaintiffs re-filing new actions asserting the claims asserted here in this Court or any other Court”