Defendants say derivative claims are meritless
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Marathon and the individual defendants assert that the derivative claims are meritless because the complaints do not allege intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law, as Nevada law requires.
Source (primary)
Bernard v. Theil — Entry #39: RESPONSE to 36 Motion by Defendants Georges Antoun, Kevin Denuccio, Sarita James, Jay Leupp, Merrick D (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-02)Live source ↗
Quote: “The claims are meritless. ... No intentional misconduct, fraud, or knowing violation of law is alleged in plaintiffs' complaints.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Bernard v. Theil — Entry #39: RESPONSE to 36 Motion by Defendants Georges Antoun, Kevin Denuccio, Sarita James, Jay Leupp, Merrick D
Quote: “The claims are meritless. ... No intentional misconduct, fraud, or knowing violation of law is alleged in plaintiffs' complaints.”