Related federal securities action (Schlatre)
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
The derivative actions are related to an earlier-filed federal securities class action against Marathon, Schlatre v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc., which is governed by the PSLRA and was assigned to the same judges.
Source (primary)
Strassman v. <mark>Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc</mark>. — Entry #33: Joint STIPULATION re Discovery Concerning Discovery Plan (First Request) re 32 Order, by Defendants Georges Antoun, Kevin Denuccio, Sarita James, Jay Leupp… (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-02)Live source ↗
Quote: “the Bernard and Strassman Actions are also related to an earlier-filed federal securities law action, Schlatre v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc., Action No. 2:21-cv- 02209-RFB-NJK, and the Bernard and Strassman Actions thus were assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge hearing the Schlatre Action”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Strassman v. <mark>Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc</mark>. — Entry #33: Joint STIPULATION re Discovery Concerning Discovery Plan (First Request) re 32 Order, by Defendants Georges Antoun, Kevin Denuccio, Sarita James, Jay Leupp…
Quote: “the Bernard and Strassman Actions are also related to an earlier-filed federal securities law action, Schlatre v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc., Action No. 2:21-cv- 02209-RFB-NJK, and the Bernard and Strassman Actions thus were assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge hearing the Schlatre Action”