Competing lead plaintiff motions denied
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
The court denied without prejudice the other movants' motions for appointment as lead plaintiff. It said a new motion would require new developments, not reargument based on an amended complaint.
Source (primary)
Schlatre v. <mark>Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc</mark>. — Entry #50: TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings, 46 Order on Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Motion Hearing, held on 9/7/2022, before Judge Richard F (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-02)Live source ↗
Quote: “So I will grant the motion for Mr. Marina and deny without prejudice as it relates to the other moving parties.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Schlatre v. <mark>Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc</mark>. — Entry #50: TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings, 46 Order on Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Motion Hearing, held on 9/7/2022, before Judge Richard F
Quote: “So I will grant the motion for Mr. Marina and deny without prejudice as it relates to the other moving parties.”