No answer or summary judgment motion served by defendants
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Plaintiffs stated that no opposing party had served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment before the dismissal.
Source (primary)
Bernard v. Theil — Entry #50: NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Kimberly Bernard (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-02)Live source ↗
Quote: “no opposing party has either served an answer or a motion for summary judgment”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Bernard v. Theil — Entry #50: NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Kimberly Bernard
Quote: “no opposing party has either served an answer or a motion for summary judgment”