Alleged procedural defects in incorporation application
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Plaintiffs allege that statutory prerequisites under Tex. Loc. Gov't Code ch. 7 were not met, that the proposed area was never eligible for incorporation, and that defendants ignored facial defects in the application. They argue that any recorded incorporation would therefore be invalid and that MARA should not have to contest a sham election.
Source (primary)
<mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #13 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-01)Live source ↗
Quote: “The proposed area of incorporation was never eligible to be considered for incorporation under Tex. Loc. Gov't Code § 7.001.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms <mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #13
Quote: “The proposed area of incorporation was never eligible to be considered for incorporation under Tex. Loc. Gov't Code § 7.001.”