Plaintiffs' delay disserves public interest
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
The court found that enjoining the election would disserve the public interest. Plaintiffs waited until October 27, 2025, eight days before the election, to seek an injunction, even though MARA's counsel was told on October 3, 2025 that the county would not invalidate the petition and that the courts were open for an injunction.
Source (primary)
<mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #13 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-01)Live source ↗
Quote: “Plaintiffs knew from Defendants that their last resort before the election was to file an injunction, and despite that, Plaintiffs waited 25 days to initiate proceedings.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms <mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #13
Quote: “Plaintiffs knew from Defendants that their last resort before the election was to file an injunction, and despite that, Plaintiffs waited 25 days to initiate proceedings.”