No irreparable harm: post-election challenge available
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
The court found plaintiffs could not show irreparable harm. If incorporation succeeds, they can still challenge the validity of the election and of Mitchell Bend's creation after the results are certified, including by collateral attack on an incorporation that was void ab initio.
Source (primary)
<mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #13 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-01)Live source ↗
Quote: “Plaintiffs cannot show irreparable harm because even if incorporation succeeds—and it may not—Plaintiffs can still challenge the validity of the election and the creation of "Mitchell Bend" after the results are certified.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms <mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #13
Quote: “Plaintiffs cannot show irreparable harm because even if incorporation succeeds—and it may not—Plaintiffs can still challenge the validity of the election and the creation of "Mitchell Bend" after the results are certified.”