Defendants' grounds for dismissal
Company: Hut 8
The claim, verbatim
Defendants argue Lead Plaintiff lacks Section 10(b) standing, that the Securities Act claims sound in fraud and are subject to Rule 9(b), and that none of the challenged statements are materially false or misleading.
Source (primary)
Latino v. <mark>Hut 8 Corp</mark>. — Entry #9 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-30)Live source ↗
Quote: “Defendants argue that (1) Lead Plaintiff does not have statutory standing to bring a claim under Section 10(b) ... (3) Lead Plaintiff has failed to state a claim ... because none of the challenged Statements are materially false or misleading”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Latino v. <mark>Hut 8 Corp</mark>. — Entry #9
Quote: “Defendants argue that (1) Lead Plaintiff does not have statutory standing to bring a claim under Section 10(b) ... (3) Lead Plaintiff has failed to state a claim ... because none of the challenged Statements are materially false or misleading”