Defendants seek consolidation into pending In re CleanSpark Derivative Litigation
Company: CleanSpark
The claim, verbatim
The individual defendants moved to consolidate the Iraci action into the already-pending consolidated shareholder derivative action, In re CleanSpark, Inc. Derivative Litigation (Case No. 2:21-cv-01181-GMN-BNW, D. Nev.). The plaintiff moved to remand the case to state court and asked for attorney's fees.
Source (primary)
Iraci v. Bradford — Entry #24: ORDER Granting 22 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines re 15 Motion to Consolidate Cases (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-27)Live source ↗
Quote: “the Individual Defendants filed a Motion to Consolidate, asking the Court to consolidate this Action into the consolidated shareholder derivative action pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, In re CleanSpark, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-01181-GMN-BNW”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Iraci v. Bradford — Entry #24: ORDER Granting 22 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines re 15 Motion to Consolidate Cases
Quote: “the Individual Defendants filed a Motion to Consolidate, asking the Court to consolidate this Action into the consolidated shareholder derivative action pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, In re CleanSpark, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 2:21-cv-01181-GMN-BNW”