jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved September 27, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. MARA Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) — Entry #99

Case: Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. MARA Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) txwd · 7:25-cv-00222

filed May 12, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #99 · filed June 15, 2026

Order Dismissing Case

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Marathon Digital (listed as “MARA Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.)”). We checked the full party list on September 13, 2026 and confirmed the match.

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved September 27, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172841950/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172841950.99.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Retrieved
2026-09-27 16:20:14.671353-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
167653
SHA-256
12eb593b4af4ace9f6415205775e8b141c8f323f94a327e1a08540570c6b02be

Document text

1 page(s), 1,896 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 7:25-cv-00222-DC-DTG             Document 99        Filed 06/15/26     Page 1 of 1


                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                             MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION

MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LTD.,                     §
KEY PATENT INNOVATIONS LTD.                   §
     Plaintiffs,                              §
                                              §
v.                                            §       NO.     MO:25-CV-00222
                                              §
MARA HOLDINGS, INC. F/K/A,                    §
MARATHON DIGITAL HOLDINGS,                    §
INC.,                                         §
      Defendant.                              §

                                             ORDER

       Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 98)
filed June 15, 2026. The Plaintiff agrees and stipulates that all claims for relief asserted against
Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows a
plaintiff to dismiss an action upon filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
appeared. The Plaintiff has done so. “Stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) . . . require
no judicial action or approval and are effective automatically upon filing.” Yesh Music v.
Lakewood Church, 727 F.3d 356, 362 (5th Cir. 2013). The request to dismiss all claims against
Defendants is hereby GRANTED.
       The Court therefore ORDERS that the Clerk of Court CLOSE this action. Each party
shall bear and pay their respective attorney fees and costs herein.
       It is so ORDERED.
       SIGNED this 15th day of June, 2026.


                                              DAVID COUNTS
                                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE