Stronghold derivative litigation carved out of release
Company: TeraWulf
The claim, verbatim
The judgment does not bar any derivative plaintiff in In re Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 1:23-cv-07840-RA (S.D.N.Y.).
Source (primary)
Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #135: FINAL JUDGMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, after due deliberation, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “nothing in this Judgment shall bar any action by any of the Parties to enforce or effectuate the terms of the Stipulation or this Judgment or any derivative plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned In re Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #135: FINAL JUDGMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, after due deliberation, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1
Quote: “nothing in this Judgment shall bar any action by any of the Parties to enforce or effectuate the terms of the Stipulation or this Judgment or any derivative plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned In re Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation”