Securities Act complaint over Stronghold IPO dismissed with prejudice
Company: TeraWulf
The claim, verbatim
The Amended Class Action Complaint for violation of the Securities Act of 1933, filed October 18, 2022, was dismissed in its entirety with prejudice and without costs, except as the Stipulation provides.
Source (primary)
Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #135: FINAL JUDGMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, after due deliberation, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “The Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Securities Act of 1933, filed on October 18, 2022 (the “Complaint”), is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, and without costs to any Party”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #135: FINAL JUDGMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, after due deliberation, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1
Quote: “The Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Securities Act of 1933, filed on October 18, 2022 (the “Complaint”), is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, and without costs to any Party”