Stronghold class settlement: litigation expenses cap of $250,000
Company: TeraWulf
The claim, verbatim
Lead Plaintiff states that the Notice said Co-Lead Counsel would request payment of Litigation Expenses of no more than $250,000, plus accrued interest.
Source (primary)
Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “payment of Litigation Expenses not to exceed $250,000, plus accrued interest, if any”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval
Quote: “payment of Litigation Expenses not to exceed $250,000, plus accrued interest, if any”