Stronghold securities class action settlement: no objections or valid exclusions
Company: TeraWulf
The claim, verbatim
Lead Plaintiff asserts that after the March 21, 2025 deadlines passed, there were no objections to the proposed Settlement, Plan of Allocation or Fee and Expense Application, and no valid requests for exclusion. One exclusion request was received and deemed invalid.
Source (primary)
Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “There have been no objections to the proposed Settlement or Plan of Allocation, no objections to the Fee and Expense Application, and no valid requests for exclusion.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval
Quote: “There have been no objections to the proposed Settlement or Plan of Allocation, no objections to the Fee and Expense Application, and no valid requests for exclusion.”