Dismissal with prejudice of Securities Act complaint
Company: TeraWulf
The claim, verbatim
The proposed judgment would dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint under the Securities Act of 1933, filed October 18, 2022, in its entirety, with prejudice. Under its terms, the settlement would not be an admission of liability by Stronghold or the other defendants.
Source (primary)
Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “The Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Securities Act of 1933, filed on October 18, 2022 (the “Complaint”), is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval
Quote: “The Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Securities Act of 1933, filed on October 18, 2022 (the “Complaint”), is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice”