Stronghold IPO securities class action settlement – proposed final approval
Company: TeraWulf
The claim, verbatim
In an unsigned proposed final judgment, the plaintiff asks the court to approve the class settlement with Stronghold Digital Mining, its executives and IPO underwriters as fair, reasonable and adequate. The court has not entered this judgment.
Source (primary)
Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ... this Court hereby approves the Settlement and finds that ... said Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval
Quote: “[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ... this Court hereby approves the Settlement and finds that ... said Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate”