jain.com — data centers, connectivity and security, analyzed daily

Tag: data center cooling

  • SKF’s MBx Bearing Aims at Data Center Chiller Lead Times, Not Just 30–40% Savings

    SKF’s MBx Bearing Aims at Data Center Chiller Lead Times, Not Just 30–40% Savings

    TL;DR · 30-second read

    The Short Version

    Data centers, the buildings full of computers behind every app and website, get very hot. Giant cooling machines called chillers keep them running.

    Swedish manufacturer SKF makes parts that let the spinning heart of those machines float on magnets, with no oil and no rubbing. It says this design can cut energy use by up to 30 to 40 percent compared with older designs.

    The newer twist: SKF redesigned the part so factories can build it faster, because data center demand for these machines is growing.

    SKF, the Gothenburg, Sweden-based bearing maker, announced on October 7, 2026 that it will launch its new MBx active magnetic bearing series for high-speed chillers at Chillventa 2026, the refrigeration and heat-pump trade fair in Nuremberg, Germany, running October 13–15. SKF says the MBx is designed to optimize cost while maintaining performance, using automatic winding and a modular design that enables semi-automated production, faster assembly, shorter lead times and more production capacity for its high-speed motors to meet growing demand from the data center chiller market.

    SKF will also show its new CeraDrive hybrid ceramic bearings and a new Extreme super-precision bearing platform rated for speeds up to 120,000 rpm. The company says its broader magnetic-bearing drive offering delivers energy efficiency improvements of up to 30–40% compared with conventional technologies.

    Executive Summary

    SKF is pitching three bearing technologies at compressor and chiller manufacturers, the companies that build the large cooling machines used in data centers and heat pumps. The headline product is MBx, a new active magnetic bearing, meaning a system that holds a spinning shaft in place with controlled magnetic fields so it never touches a surface and needs no lubricating oil.

    What stands out is how SKF describes the MBx’s purpose. Its stated innovations are manufacturing ones: automatic winding, a modular design, semi-automated production and faster assembly, aimed explicitly at reducing lead times and expanding capacity for the data center chiller market. The efficiency figure in the release, up to 30–40%, describes SKF’s integrated oil-free drive offering against unspecified conventional technologies rather than a new gain from MBx itself.

    For data center operators and the chiller makers that supply them, that framing matters. It suggests SKF sees the near-term opportunity in its customers’ ability to get enough oil-free drivetrains, quickly and at the right cost, not only in squeezing out further efficiency.

    The New Part Is a Manufacturing Story

    Read closely, the MBx announcement is less about a performance breakthrough than about production. SKF says the bearing is “designed to optimize cost while maintaining performance” and lists its innovations as automatic winding (machine-wound electromagnet coils rather than more labour-intensive methods) and a modular design that enables semi-automated production and faster assembly. The company states the purpose directly: to help reduce lead times and expand production capacity of SKF high-speed motors “to meet growing demand from the data center chiller market.”

    That is a meaningful signal about where SKF thinks friction lies in this market, in the commercial sense rather than the mechanical one. A centrifugal chiller, the type of large cooling machine common in big data center plants, is built around its compressor, and an oil-free compressor is built around its motor and bearing system. If that drivetrain is slow to source or expensive to produce, it constrains how many oil-free chillers a manufacturer can ship. And a data center cannot bring capacity online without the cooling plant to support it. SKF has not said its lead times are currently a problem for customers, but it has chosen to make shortening them the headline benefit of its new product.

    The people most directly affected are chiller and compressor manufacturers deciding whose magnetic-bearing systems to design around. Downstream, data center developers and their engineering contractors care about two outcomes: whether oil-free chillers become cheaper relative to conventional units, and whether delivery schedules for cooling equipment get shorter. SKF’s release claims progress on the inputs to both, without yet quantifying either.

    Why Oil-Free Matters in a Data Center Chiller

    Conventional compressor bearings are rolling or sliding contacts that need oil, and that oil has to be pumped, filtered, monitored and eventually replaced. In a refrigeration circuit, oil can also migrate into heat exchangers, where it can degrade heat transfer. Magnetic bearings remove the contact and the oil entirely: the shaft is levitated, sensors track its position thousands of times a second, and a digital controller adjusts the magnetic fields to keep it centred.

    SKF argues this reduces wear, maintenance and unplanned downtime, and that is the point that resonates with data center operators. Cooling is one of the few systems whose failure can force IT equipment to throttle or shut down, so operators design chiller plants with redundancy and treat maintenance windows carefully. Fewer wearing parts and no oil system mean fewer things that can fail and fewer reasons to take a unit offline.

    SKF positions itself as a full-stack supplier here: high-speed motors levitated on magnetic bearings, the bearings themselves, digital controllers, variable-speed drives (electronics that let the compressor run at whatever speed the cooling load requires), condition monitoring and engineering services. For a chiller maker, buying an integrated drivetrain can shorten its own development time; the trade-off is deeper dependence on a single supplier.

    Reading the 30–40% Efficiency Claim

    The release’s most quotable number is that SKF’s integrated magnetic-bearing offering delivers “energy efficiency improvements of up to 30–40% compared with conventional technologies.” Two qualifiers matter. “Up to” marks the top of a range, not a typical result. And the baseline, “conventional technologies,” is not defined: the gain from replacing an older fixed-speed, oil-lubricated compressor would be expected to be larger than the gain over a modern variable-speed unit.

    Efficiency at the chiller also does not translate one-for-one into data center energy savings. Chillers are one component of a cooling plant that includes pumps, cooling towers, air handlers and, in many climates, free-cooling modes that bypass the compressor for part of the year. The real-world benefit depends on the site’s climate, load profile and plant design.

    SKF’s broader framing, that around 20 percent of the world’s energy consumption goes to overcoming friction, is a company claim offered as context for its business rather than a specific figure for cooling. It is a reasonable reminder that rotating machinery is everywhere in infrastructure, but it should not be read as an estimate of savings available in data centers.

    Ceramics and Extreme Speeds Fill Out the Portfolio

    SKF is not betting only on magnetic levitation. It will also show hybrid ceramic bearings, including a new optimized CeraDrive series, for chillers, heat pumps, steam compressors, motors, fans and pumps. Ceramic rolling elements are electrically insulating, which matters in motors fed by variable-speed drives, where stray electrical currents can pass through and pit conventional steel bearings. SKF also says the ceramics support high-speed operation when lubrication conditions are demanding.

    The new Extreme super-precision platform targets high-speed centrifugal compressors in chillers, heat pumps and mechanical vapour recompression systems (which compress steam to reuse its heat). SKF quotes capabilities of up to 120,000 rpm, a speed factor of 2.4 million ndm (a bearing-industry measure combining diameter and rotation speed), ring contact pressure up to 2.8 GPa and turbine-side temperatures up to 200°C.

    Offering both magnetic and advanced rolling-element bearings lets SKF serve compressor designers whichever architecture they choose, from premium oil-free machines to cost-sensitive designs that still need high speed. Commercially, that hedges SKF against any single design winning out across the cooling market.

    Background

    SKF is a Gothenburg-based industrial group known primarily for bearings, the components that let shafts rotate smoothly in everything from cars to factory machinery. It describes its core business as reducing friction in rotating systems and claims that around 20 percent of the world’s energy consumption goes to overcoming friction. Beyond conventional bearings, SKF sells high-speed motors levitated on magnetic bearings, active magnetic bearings, digital controllers, variable-speed drives, condition monitoring and engineering services.

    Data center growth has turned cooling into a strategic concern for operators. SKF notes that as data center capacity expands, cooling places increasing demands on energy systems, pushing chiller and compressor makers to deliver more cooling capacity while limiting energy use, maintenance and complexity. Oil-free centrifugal compressors built on magnetic bearings are one way manufacturers have addressed that, and suppliers of their drivetrains, including SKF, are now competing on cost and production capacity as well as performance.

    Sources

    Source: SKF to showcase new technologies for energy-efficient and reliable cooling at Chillventa 2026, SKF’s announcement of its MBx magnetic bearing series, CeraDrive hybrid ceramic bearings and Extreme super-precision bearing platform, distributed via PR Newswire on October 7, 2026.

  • AI Data Center Water Risk Runs Through 50,000 Utilities’ Cyber Defenses

    AI Data Center Water Risk Runs Through 50,000 Utilities’ Cyber Defenses

    TL;DR · 30-second read

    The Short Version

    A cybersecurity company called Cyware is teaming up with WaterISAC, the group that helps American water utilities warn each other about hackers.

    The goal is simple: when one water system spots an attack, the warning should reach the others fast, including thousands of tiny rural systems with little or no security staff.

    Why it matters beyond your tap: many of the huge computer buildings that power artificial intelligence rely on the local water supply to stay cool and to fight fires. If the local water plant is hacked, those buildings are exposed too. No price or timeline was announced.

    Cyware announced on Sept. 30, 2026, in a release distributed via PR Newswire, a partnership with WaterISAC, the information-sharing organization for the US water sector. Under the arrangement, WaterISAC will use Cyware’s threat intelligence platform to collect, enrich and distribute cyber threat data and vulnerability alerts to water and wastewater utilities.

    WaterISAC said its existing partnership with the National Rural Water Association already lets it serve more than 20,000 of the sector’s smallest utilities, and that Cyware was selected after an evaluation of available platforms. No financial terms, contract length or rollout schedule were disclosed.

    Executive Summary

    WaterISAC, the hub through which US water utilities, security experts and government partners share threat warnings, is moving its intelligence work onto Cyware’s platform. The stated aim is to replace manual processes for gathering and enriching threat data with automation, so that alerts reach members faster and larger utilities can receive intelligence directly.

    The deal matters because the US water sector is extraordinarily fragmented. The release counts more than 50,000 utilities, many of them small, and argues that each one is a potential point of failure. Collective defense, the idea that a threat seen by one member protects all of them, only works if warnings reach the weakest participants in a form they can act on.

    For data center operators, the announcement is a reminder that a facility’s physical resilience depends on infrastructure it does not control. Cooling systems that draw on municipal water, and fire-suppression systems fed by the local supply, inherit the cyber posture of whichever utility serves the site.

    Why a Water-Sector Deal Belongs on a Data Center Risk Register

    Data center resilience planning usually focuses on what sits inside the fence: backup generators, redundant cooling loops, dual fiber paths. Water is often treated as a commodity input. But many facilities, especially those using evaporative or other water-based cooling, draw on the local municipal supply, and building fire-suppression systems commonly depend on it as well. The Cyware release itself lists fire suppression alongside drinking water and sanitation as a core function of water systems.

    That dependency runs through operational technology, or OT: the control systems that run pumps, valves, chemical dosing and treatment at a water plant. Cyware’s release states that adversaries targeting OT now move at machine speed. If a utility’s controls are disrupted, pressure and supply can be affected for every customer on that system, including a data center campus. The operational conclusion is that the relevant cyber defender for a site’s water is not a national agency or a large vendor, but one of more than 50,000 local utilities, each with its own level of security staffing and maturity.

    For operators and developers, that makes the local utility’s cyber posture a legitimate site-selection and resilience input, weighed alongside on-site water storage and cooling design. It also means that sector-wide efforts like WaterISAC’s affect data center risk indirectly: a better-informed local utility is a more dependable upstream supplier.

    The Small-Utility Problem Is the Real Test

    The most revealing detail in the announcement is structural. WaterISAC says its partnership with the National Rural Water Association already lets it serve more than 20,000 of the smallest utilities. WaterISAC Executive Director Tom Dobbins described the Cyware platform as helping WaterISAC’s analysts deliver more real-time insights to members and letting the organization extend intelligence directly to larger utilities.

    Read together, those statements suggest a tiered model: analysts work in the platform, larger utilities may connect directly, and smaller utilities receive curated output. That is a reasonable design, since a rural system with no dedicated security staff cannot ingest a raw threat feed. But it also means the speed gains Cyware describes will be felt most by larger members and by WaterISAC’s own analysts. Whether a warning reaches every participant regardless of size, as Cyware’s Tom Stockmeyer framed the goal, depends on how that last step is handled.

    What the AI Claims Establish, and What They Do Not

    Cyware positions itself around agentic AI, meaning software that automates steps an analyst would otherwise perform, such as collecting, enriching and routing threat data. The release says this will help WaterISAC significantly reduce manual effort and deliver intelligence more efficiently. Those are plausible benefits for an intelligence team, but the release offers no baseline, no target metrics and no description of how automated outputs are validated before distribution.

    It is also worth separating intelligence speed from response speed. A warning delivered in seconds helps only if the recipient can act on it. For a small utility, the bottleneck is often people and budget rather than information. The partnership addresses the information side; the response side remains with each utility. Cyware has also said it is supporting NRECA on Department of Energy-funded research into automated collective defense for electric cooperatives, which places the company across both utility inputs that data centers depend on most: power and water.

    Background

    The US water sector is unusually fragmented: more than 50,000 utilities, ranging from large metropolitan systems to small rural operations with minimal staff. WaterISAC serves as the sector’s information-sharing hub, one of a family of industry-specific ISACs that pool threat warnings so members can learn from one another. Through its partnership with the National Rural Water Association, WaterISAC says it reaches more than 20,000 of the smallest utilities.

    Cyware is a threat intelligence software vendor that unifies intelligence management, sharing and collaboration, and orchestration and automation. It markets itself around agentic AI and collective defense, and counts enterprises, government agencies and ISACs among its customers. The WaterISAC deal extends that ISAC-focused strategy into a sector whose resilience underpins other infrastructure, including data centers that rely on local water for cooling and fire protection.

    Sources

    Source: Cyware and WaterISAC Join Forces to Strengthen Water Sector Cyber Defense, Cyware’s Sept. 30, 2026 announcement of its threat intelligence partnership with WaterISAC.

  • Modine’s 300 Openings Put AI Cooling Output on a Hiring Curve, Not a Construction One

    Modine’s 300 Openings Put AI Cooling Output on a Hiring Curve, Not a Construction One

    TL;DR · 30-second read

    The Short Version

    A factory near Milwaukee wants up to 300 new workers. It builds giant cooling systems for data centers, the warehouse-sized buildings full of computers that run websites and artificial intelligence tools.

    Pay starts at $23 an hour, about $47,800 a year full-time. No factory experience is needed, and training happens on the job.

    The surprising part is that the building opened a year ago. What the company needs now is people to run a second shift. Every one of those computer buildings needs cooling before it can switch on, so this hiring helps decide how fast they arrive.

    Modine (NYSE: MOD), the Racine, Wisconsin-based thermal management company, said on September 23, 2026 that it is hiring for up to 300 long-term manufacturing positions at its data center cooling plant in Franklin, Wisconsin. The roles span first and second shifts. Production assembler pay starts at $23 an hour, second shift earns an extra $1 an hour, and benefits begin on day one. A walk-in hiring fair runs September 24 from 4 to 7 p.m., and a billboard campaign across the Milwaukee area will run while hiring continues over the coming months.

    The 153,000-square-foot Franklin plant opened in September 2025 and makes Modine’s Airedale data center cooling systems. The announcement comes a week before Modine completes the spin-off of its Performance Technologies business into a combination with Gentherm, which is expected to close October 1.

    Executive Summary

    Modine’s announcement is a hiring notice, but it also shows where the company is in its data center cooling expansion. In July 2025 Modine announced added U.S. capacity for Airedale cooling products across plants in Franklin, Wisconsin; Grand Prairie, Texas; Grenada, Mississippi; and Jefferson City, Missouri. The Franklin building has now been operating for a year. Modine says the next step is people: “We’re now at a point where we need a larger, committed workforce,” said Karen Sutherland, Vice President of Human Resources for Data Centers, Americas.

    That matters to anyone who depends on cooling equipment arriving on schedule. Once a plant exists, its output is set mainly by how many shifts it can staff and how quickly new workers become productive. Modine is recruiting mostly people without manufacturing experience and training them on the job. The speed of that process will shape how quickly the Franklin plant converts demand into shipped units.

    The timing adds a corporate dimension. Filings made September 17 show Modine separating its Performance Technologies business on October 1. The company that remains, which Modine has said will be renamed Modexus Solutions, will be smaller and more concentrated on businesses like Airedale.

    The Building Is Done. The Shifts Are Not.

    A factory’s output comes down to three things: floor space, the hours that space is in use, and the productivity of the people working in it. Modine settled the first in September 2025, when it opened the 153,000-square-foot Franklin plant dedicated to Airedale data center cooling systems. This week’s announcement concerns the other two. Modine says the up-to-300 new hires will “help ramp up production to meet increasing demand,” and it is hiring across both first and second shifts, paying a $1-an-hour premium to fill the later one.

    A second shift is usually the fastest and cheapest way to raise output from an existing plant. It needs no new permits, no construction, and no new utility connection. It needs people, and in Modine’s own words that is the requirement it has now reached. For the Franklin plant, the pace of growth now depends mainly on recruiting and training. Construction timelines matter less at this stage. This is the plain meaning of the title. Floor space in Franklin is fixed at 153,000 square feet, and extra output from it has to come from staffing more hours.

    This affects data center developers and operators who are waiting on cooling equipment. A cooling supplier’s plant footprint is only a rough proxy for its delivery capacity. Shift coverage and workforce experience are closer measures. For Modine’s investors, the hiring pace becomes a leading indicator of whether Franklin can turn demand into revenue at the rate the company expects. Modine has not published any output targets for the plant.

    What $23 an Hour and No Experience Required Signal

    At $23 an hour and 40-hour weeks, a starting assembler earns about $47,800 a year before overtime, or about $49,900 on second shift. If all 300 positions were filled at the starting rate on full-time hours, base wages alone would come to roughly $14.4 million a year, before benefits and shift premiums. This is an illustrative calculation from the release’s figures, not a number Modine disclosed. Still, it shows that the ramp represents a meaningful recurring cost commitment.

    The recruiting approach says more than the wage does. Modine says most entry-level roles need no prior manufacturing experience and that it provides on-the-job training. That widens the pool of applicants, but it also means new hires start at the bottom of a learning curve. Output per worker is likely to rise over months, not immediately. A walk-in fair with on-the-spot interviews and a Milwaukee-area billboard campaign point to hiring at volume. Modine also describes the roles as long-term. Hiring a permanent workforce rather than temporary labor suggests Modine expects demand to last, although that is the company’s own characterization and it has not tied the roles to a disclosed order book.

    A Smaller Modine, More Concentrated on Cooling

    The hiring announcement arrives days before a major change in Modine’s structure. According to an 8-K and the joint Gentherm–Modine release filed September 17, Modine will spin off its Performance Technologies business and merge it into Gentherm in a Reverse Morris Trust. In this structure, a unit is distributed to shareholders and immediately merges with another company, generally so the separation can be tax-free. The record date is September 28, and the distribution and merger are both expected October 1, 2026. Former SpinCo holders are expected to own about 43.6% of the combined company.

    The filings also revise the cash side of the deal. Because falling overlap between Modine and Gentherm shareholders will increase the exchange ratio, Gentherm expects to issue about 2,902,466 additional shares. To offset that, the cash distribution to Modine before the merger is expected to fall from $210 million to $159 million, and Gentherm will pay its own shareholders a special dividend of about $58.35 million. The companies describe the adjustment as economically neutral, and final figures will be set at closing.

    The Airedale data center cooling business stays with Modine. After October 1 it becomes a larger share of a smaller company, which Modine has said will be renamed Modexus Solutions. That raises the importance of execution at plants like Franklin. The analyst and investor day scheduled for November 18, 2026 is the next natural occasion for the company to put numbers on capacity, staffing and demand.

    Background

    Modine has worked in thermal management for more than 100 years. It is headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin, employs more than 11,000 people, and operates in North America, South America, Europe and Asia. It has reported two segments, Climate Solutions and Performance Technologies. Performance Technologies is being separated and combined with Gentherm on October 1, 2026, and the remaining company is due to be renamed Modexus Solutions. Modine’s data center cooling products are sold under the Airedale brand.

    Data center cooling is the equipment that removes heat from server halls: chillers, air handlers and related systems that keep computing hardware within safe operating temperatures. As U.S. data center construction has grown, suppliers have added manufacturing capacity. Modine’s July 2025 expansion across four U.S. plants, including the Franklin facility that opened in September 2025, is its part of that buildout.

    Sources

    Source: Continued Growth in Data Center Cooling Business Drives 300 Open Roles — Modine’s September 23, 2026 announcement of up to 300 manufacturing positions at its Franklin, Wisconsin Airedale plant.

    Primary sources: Modine Form 425 (Form 8-K), filed September 17, 2026; Exhibit 99.1 to Form 425: Gentherm and Modine joint press release, September 17, 2026; Modine Form 8-K, filed September 17, 2026; Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K: Gentherm and Modine joint press release, September 17, 2026.

  • Two Degrees Decide Whether an AI Cooling Unit Is 5 MW or 3 MW — and How Many You Buy

    Two Degrees Decide Whether an AI Cooling Unit Is 5 MW or 3 MW — and How Many You Buy

    TL;DR · 30-second read

    The Short Version

    Artificial intelligence runs inside warehouse-sized buildings packed with computers that get extremely hot. Getting that heat out has become one of the hardest and costliest parts of building them.

    On September 19 in Santa Clara, California, the Italian air-conditioning maker Clivet showed a new range of cooling equipment built for those buildings, including its largest heat-removal unit yet.

    The catch is in the fine print. That unit only reaches full strength if operators let the cooling water run slightly warmer. Ask it for water two degrees colder and it carries about 40 percent less heat — so you need more machines, and more floor space to put them on.

    Clivet said in a September 19 press release that it made the global debut of its next-generation magnetic levitation compressor at AI Infra Summit 2026 in Santa Clara, California, under a “DUO POWER BOOST” theme. The compressor uses a dual-rotor, two-stage architecture in which each rotor and impeller varies speed independently to suit different flow rates and pressure ratios.

    Alongside it, the company showed a data center cooling portfolio spanning air-cooled magnetic levitation chillers, a “magnetic CDU” that merges the cooling source with liquid-cooling distribution, high-capacity coolant distribution units, fan walls and terminal units. The largest CDU on display is rated up to 3 MW at a 3K approach temperature difference or 5 MW at 5K, with predictive control holding temperature fluctuation within ±0.5°C and key components replaceable online. Clivet also staged a joint power-and-cooling coordination demonstration with CLOU, which supplied energy storage and power delivery.

    Executive Summary

    This is a product debut rather than a contract announcement: no customer, no order book, no ship date. What makes it worth reading closely is a single line in the specification. The same coolant distribution unit — the box that takes heat from the water loop running through server racks and hands it to the building’s chilled-water system — is rated at 3 MW or 5 MW depending on nothing more than how close the two water temperatures are allowed to get.

    That gap, called the approach temperature difference, is normally treated as a plumbing detail. At AI rack densities it is a capacity decision. A two-kelvin change in the specification moves roughly 2 MW of heat rejection per unit, which translates directly into how many CDUs an operator buys, how much floor space they consume and how much pipework threads the room.

    The wider signal is a European HVAC manufacturer re-pointing core product lines — chillers, compressors, air handling — at AI thermal loads, and pairing them with an energy-storage partner so that power and cooling arrive as one conversation. Clivet has disclosed an architecture and a capacity envelope. It has not disclosed efficiency ratings, availability, pricing or a single deployment.

    The Spec Sheet, Not the Steel, Sets the Megawatts

    Read the CDU rating again: up to 3 MW at 3K approach temperature difference, or 5 MW at 5K. Approach temperature is the gap between the facility water a chiller plant delivers and the warmer technology-side water that actually circulates through cold plates on the processors. A heat exchanger’s duty scales with the temperature difference driving it, so widening the approach from 3K to 5K — a factor of 1.67 — lifts the rating from 3 MW to 5 MW, also a factor of 1.67. The ratings track heat-exchanger physics almost exactly. Nothing inside the cabinet changed.

    The operational consequence is the part buyers underestimate. An operator whose chip vendor mandates cold inlet water, and who therefore specifies a tight 3K approach, is buying a 3 MW machine at the price and footprint of a 5 MW one. Sizing a 30 MW hall needs ten units instead of six, with the extra floor area, valve sets, pipe runs, commissioning hours and maintenance headcount that go with them. Conversely, an operator who can accept warmer technology-side water recovers roughly 67 percent more capacity per unit — and typically unlocks more free-cooling hours upstream, because warmer facility water lets the chiller’s compressors idle for more of the year.

    That uplift is not free, and Clivet’s release does not price it. Moving 5 MW instead of 3 MW through the same unit means proportionally more flow at a given temperature rise, which means pump power, larger secondary pipework and higher pressure drop. Flow rates, pump curves and pressure-drop figures were not published. The honest reading is that the 5 MW headline number is real but conditional, and the condition is set by the silicon vendor’s inlet temperature limit, not by the cooling vendor.

    Why Magnetic Levitation, and Why the Compressor Is the Announcement

    A magnetic levitation compressor spins its impellers on magnetic bearings rather than oil-lubricated ones. Removing oil removes a chronic efficiency tax: over time, oil migrates into heat exchangers and films the tube walls, degrading heat transfer in exactly the equipment whose job is heat transfer. Oil-free machines also tolerate frequent starts and hold efficiency well at part load — which matters because a data center chiller plant almost never runs at design load.

    Clivet’s specific claim is architectural. The DUO POWER BOOST design puts two rotors in a two-stage compression path and lets each vary speed independently, so the machine can trade flow against pressure ratio as ambient conditions and IT load move. In principle that widens the efficient operating envelope, which is the right target for a facility whose load profile swings with training runs and whose lift changes with the seasons.

    What is substantiated here is a design description. What is not substantiated is performance. The release contains no coefficient of performance, no part-load efficiency figure such as IPLV or NPLV, no capacity range for the chillers, no refrigerant, no sound data and no third-party certification. Those are the numbers a consulting engineer actually specifies against, and until they exist the compressor is an architecture rather than a comparable product.

    Selling Power and Cooling as One Problem

    The joint demonstration with CLOU — energy storage and power delivery on one side, thermal management on the other — is commercially more interesting than it looks. Clivet’s own framing is that power configuration, thermal design, space layout and maintenance planning have to be settled together in a project’s earliest stages. That is a fair description of where high-density projects slip: the electrical and mechanical designs are often procured by different teams on different schedules, and the mismatch surfaces at commissioning.

    Packaging across that boundary is a recognisable vendor strategy in this market, and it is a response to buyer behaviour rather than a technical breakthrough. Operators building AI halls increasingly want a single party accountable for the megawatt from the switchgear to the cold plate, because integration risk is what delays revenue.

    The limits should be stated plainly. What was shown was a coordinated demonstration, not a disclosed commercial arrangement. Neither company published a joint product, a reference architecture, a territory split, an exclusivity term or a customer that has bought the combination. Until one of those appears, this is a booth, not a venture.

    A European HVAC Line Re-Aimed at AI Heat

    The portfolio’s shape is the story for the wider industry. Clivet showed facility-side air-cooled chillers, a magnetic CDU that folds the cooling source and the liquid distribution loop into one machine, high-capacity CDUs for secondary-side distribution, fan walls and terminal units — coverage from outdoor heat rejection to the rack. That is a general-purpose comfort-and-process HVAC catalogue being re-cut for a single vertical, and it puts Clivet into a tier already crowded with Vertiv, Schneider Electric’s Motivair, Boyd, nVent, Munters and Modine.

    The magnetic CDU is the genuinely differentiated item in the list, because combining chiller and distribution in one enclosure removes an interface — and interfaces are where commissioning time and finger-pointing live. It also concentrates risk, which is presumably why the release stresses online replacement of key components and ±0.5°C predictive control. Tight temperature stability matters for cold-plate systems because dew point and thermal cycling both sit close to the operating envelope; a loop that overshoots risks condensation on cold plates or stress on solder joints.

    For buyers, the practical takeaway is that the competitive question in this tier is no longer whether a vendor offers liquid cooling. It is whose ratings survive the approach temperature their silicon demands, and who will put efficiency and availability numbers behind the architecture.

    Background

    Clivet is an Italian heating, ventilation and air-conditioning manufacturer based in Feltre, in the Veneto region, and has been majority-owned by China’s Midea Group since 2016. Its traditional business spans chillers, heat pumps and air-handling equipment for commercial and industrial buildings — a catalogue it is now re-aiming at data centers, where thermal design has become a primary constraint on how much computing capacity a building can hold.

    AI Infra Summit, held in Santa Clara in the heart of Silicon Valley, has become a gathering point for the supply chain behind AI buildout: chips, power, networking and increasingly cooling. The shift to direct-to-chip liquid cooling has drawn in vendors from adjacent markets — industrial refrigeration, automotive thermal, building HVAC — because a coolant distribution unit is, at bottom, a pump, a heat exchanger and a controller, all of which these companies already build at scale. What they must prove to data center buyers is uptime, serviceability and certified performance, which is why the specification sheet, not the stage demonstration, is where these launches are ultimately judged.

    Sources

    Source: DUO POWER BOOST: Clivet Debuts Next-Gen Magnetic Levitation Technology and AI Cooling Portfolio at AI Infra Summit 2026 — the company’s September 19, 2026 announcement detailing its magnetic levitation compressor architecture, CDU capacity ratings and a joint power-and-cooling demonstration with CLOU.

  • Modine Takes $51M Less Cash to Keep Its Data-Center Cooling Pivot Tax-Free

    Modine Takes $51M Less Cash to Keep Its Data-Center Cooling Pivot Tax-Free

    TL;DR · 30-second read

    The Short Version

    • Modine, a century-old Wisconsin maker of heating and cooling equipment, is splitting off its vehicle parts business and merging it into another company, Gentherm.
    • To keep the split free of a large tax bill, Modine will collect about $51 million less cash than planned: $159 million instead of $210 million.
    • Gentherm’s existing owners get a one-time payment of about $1.90 per share to balance things out.
    • What remains of Modine will focus on cooling the huge computer buildings that run the internet and online services.

    Modine Manufacturing (NYSE: MOD) and Gentherm (NASDAQ: THRM) on September 17, 2026 revised the terms of their pending combination, under which Modine spins off its Performance Technologies business and merges it into a Gentherm subsidiary. Gentherm now expects to issue about 2,902,466 additional shares in the merger. To offset that, the cash Modine receives from the spun-off business falls from $210 million to $159 million, and Gentherm will pay its existing shareholders a special dividend of about $58.35 million, or an estimated $1.90 per share. Stock Titan first reported the revised terms.

    Modine set September 28, 2026 as the record date for the spin-off. The distribution and merger are expected to close on October 1, 2026. After closing, legacy Gentherm shareholders are expected to own about 56.4% of the combined company, and former Modine shareholders about 43.6%.

    Executive Summary

    The update is a mechanical adjustment, but it shows what Modine will accept to keep its restructuring intact. The merger agreement contains a provision designed to preserve the tax-free treatment of parts of the deal for Modine and its shareholders. That provision has now been triggered, so Modine’s shareholders receive more Gentherm stock and Modine the company receives $51 million less cash at closing.

    This matters for data-center infrastructure because of what Modine becomes afterward. In a September 10 release, Modine said it will rename itself Modexus Solutions, a thermal management company serving data center cooling, commercial HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) and refrigeration. The company that will sell chillers and cooling systems into data halls will start its new life with less deal cash than it had planned. In exchange, it avoids the tax exposure the adjustment mechanism exists to prevent.

    Both companies describe the adjustment as economically neutral. The final exchange ratio, cash reduction and dividend will be set at closing and may differ from the current estimates.

    Why Modine Accepts $51 Million Less at Closing

    The deal is a Reverse Morris Trust. In this structure, a company spins a division off to its own shareholders and that division immediately merges with another company, which can let the parent shed the business without a corporate tax bill on the separation. Tax treatment for these deals broadly depends on the parent’s shareholders ending up with enough of the combined company. The joint release says the adjustment turns principally on how many investors are treated as holding both Gentherm and SpinCo stock just before the merger.

    That overlap has shrunk. According to the joint release, trading in both stocks since the merger agreement was signed reduced the number of shared holders. The agreement’s mechanism therefore raises the exchange ratio, the number of Gentherm shares each SpinCo share converts into, by roughly 2.9 million shares in total. Those extra shares go to Modine’s shareholders. To keep the negotiated split of value in place, Modine the corporation takes a 24% smaller cash distribution: $159 million instead of $210 million.

    The trade-off is clear from the order of the terms. Protecting the tax-free status of the separation takes priority over the size of the cash payment. For a company repositioning around data-center cooling, a clean exit from its vehicle-related business matters more than the last $51 million of proceeds.

    What the Cooling Company Carries Out of the Deal

    After closing, Modine will be a narrower business. Its September 10 release describes the future Modexus Solutions as serving ‘high-growth markets, including data center cooling, commercial HVAC and refrigeration.’ It will keep the MOD ticker, and CEO Neil Brinker and CFO Mick Lucareli will stay in place. Shareholders will vote on the name change within three months of closing.

    Data-center cooling is capital- and capacity-hungry. Suppliers compete on manufacturing footprint, lead times and engineering for denser, hotter server racks. Cash from a divestiture is one of the cleaner ways to fund that. The revision leaves Modine with less of it: $159 million instead of $210 million. Modine’s shareholders keep the value as Gentherm stock, but that value sits in an automotive-focused company, not in the cooling business.

    The companies have not said how the lower proceeds change Modine’s capital plans, if at all. Operators and investors watching Modine’s data-center capacity should look for that answer at its next disclosures, not assume the reduction is immaterial.

    Who Absorbs the Adjustment

    Each group is made whole in a different currency. Modine shareholders receive more Gentherm shares but are expressly excluded from the special dividend on those shares. Legacy Gentherm shareholders receive about $1.90 per share in cash, payable October 7 and only if the merger closes, to compensate for dilution from the added shares.

    The combined Gentherm keeps $51 million inside SpinCo that would otherwise have gone to Modine, then pays out about $58.35 million to its legacy holders. On the current estimates, the combined company ends up with a few million dollars less cash than under the original terms, while Modine absorbs the full $51 million reduction. The two offsets together total roughly $109 million against about 2.9 million additional shares.

    The companies say the adjustment has ‘a neutral effect on the economics of the transaction.’ That holds at the level of total value. It does not mean each corporate balance sheet is unaffected, and the balance sheet that shrinks most is the one aimed at data-center cooling.

    Background

    Modine, headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin, has made heating and cooling technology for more than 100 years and employs more than 13,000 people. It has been reshaping its portfolio toward what it calls high-growth thermal markets, most visibly cooling for data centers, where rising server power density makes heat removal a central design constraint.

    Gentherm, based in Novi, Michigan, supplies thermal and comfort technologies, mainly to the automotive industry. Combining it with Modine’s Performance Technologies business gives Gentherm a larger vehicle-related platform. Modine keeps its climate, HVAC and data-center cooling operations under the planned Modexus Solutions name.

    Sources

    Source: Gentherm–Modine (NYSE: MOD) deal adds special cash payout for Gentherm shareholders, Stock Titan’s summary of Modine’s revised spin-merger terms.

    Primary sources: Modine Form 425, filed September 17, 2026; Gentherm and Modine joint press release (Exhibit 99.1 to Form 425), September 17, 2026; Modine Form 8-K, filed September 17, 2026; Gentherm and Modine joint press release (Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K), September 17, 2026; Modine Form 425, filed September 10, 2026; Modine to Become Modexus Solutions (Exhibit 99.1), September 10, 2026.

  • Munters Bets on Virginia to Shorten Data Center Cooling Lead Times

    Munters Bets on Virginia to Shorten Data Center Cooling Lead Times

    TL;DR · 30-second read

    The Short Version

    The machines that stop computer warehouses from overheating are hard to get right now. Munters, a Swedish company that makes that cooling equipment, has finished enlarging its factory in Daleville, Virginia.

    The site is now about the size of ten football fields and employs close to 600 people. It has started building chillers, the large refrigeration units that cool whole buildings. Until now those were shipped in from Italy.

    Why it matters: computers running artificial intelligence get very hot, and waiting for cooling gear is one reason new data centers open late.

    Munters said in a September 11 release distributed by PR Newswire that it has inaugurated an expanded campus for data center cooling in Daleville, Virginia, adding manufacturing, training and testing space. The site covers 565,000 square feet, employs close to 600 people, and is the largest of five dedicated manufacturing facilities inside the company’s Data Center Technologies business worldwide.

    The expansion lets Munters build every product in its data center cooling range at one address: air-side economizers, the patented SyCool Split, computer room air handling units, fan coil arrays, coolant distribution units, and now chillers, which were previously produced in Italy. The campus also houses the Munters Service Academy, new production test stands, and a chiller laboratory with an environmental chamber.

    Executive Summary

    The announcement is less about a building than about where a building sits. Munters has moved chiller assembly from Italy to a site a few hours’ drive from the densest concentration of data centers on earth, and it can now produce its entire cooling portfolio in one place rather than splitting production across continents.

    That matters because mechanical plant has become a gating item for artificial intelligence buildouts. A chiller is a large, heavy, custom-configured machine. Ocean freight, customs, currency swings and trans-Atlantic scheduling all sit between an order and a commissioned data hall, and none of them respond to urgency. Manufacturing on the same landmass as the customer removes weeks of that friction and makes change orders cheaper to absorb.

    The strategic logic is sound and the physical facts are specific. The performance claims attached to it are not. Munters describes its Circlemiser chiller as greatly reducing energy consumption and total required power versus typical air-cooled chillers, but publishes no percentage, baseline or test condition alongside that statement. Buyers should treat the factory as substantiated and the efficiency claim as a directional marketing position awaiting data.

    Geography Is the Product

    Daleville is in southwestern Virginia, near Roanoke and well outside the Northern Virginia cluster that hosts the world’s largest agglomeration of data centers. That distance is a feature. Land and labor are cheaper away from the cluster, while the finished equipment is still a domestic truck haul from the campuses that will consume it, rather than a port call.

    The freight economics of cooling equipment are unlike those of servers. A rack of compute is dense, valuable and air-freightable. A chiller is bulky, comparatively low in value per cubic meter, and moves by sea. Shifting Circlemiser production from Italy to Virginia therefore converts a multi-week international logistics chain into a domestic one, and removes a layer of tariff and currency exposure from the delivered price. For a developer whose revenue starts only when a hall is energized, schedule certainty on mechanical plant is worth real money.

    There is a second, quieter advantage. Cooling systems for large campuses are rarely catalog items. When engineering, manufacturing, testing and service training sit on one site, a design change can be resolved in a corridor conversation rather than across a seven-hour time difference. That compression of the iteration loop is the part of co-location that does not show up in a square-footage figure.

    One Roof, Air Through Liquid

    The portfolio list in the announcement is worth unpacking, because it maps the whole transition the industry is living through. Air-side economizers pull in outside air when it is cool enough, letting a facility idle its compressors and save power. Computer room air handling units, known as CRAHs, push chilled air through the room. Fan coil arrays do similar work closer to the equipment. These are the tools of the air-cooled era, and they still cool the overwhelming majority of installed capacity.

    Coolant distribution units, or CDUs, belong to the next era. They are the pump-and-heat-exchanger boxes that push liquid coolant directly to chips, which is how the densest artificial intelligence racks shed heat that air can no longer carry away fast enough. Chillers sit underneath both approaches, producing the chilled water that feeds air handlers and liquid loops alike.

    Building all of it in one factory is a hedge against an uncertain mix. No one knows precisely how quickly liquid cooling will displace air, or what share of a given campus will be hybrid. A manufacturer that can flex between the two without retooling a second site carries less risk than one that has bet a plant on a single architecture. The commercial question is whether that flexibility comes with the throughput a hyperscale order actually requires, and the announcement does not quantify capacity.

    Demand Is Evidently Not the Constraint

    Munters has told investors that order intake in the April-to-June quarter rose 137 percent, driven by strong demand in Data Center Technologies and its AirTech business, and separately announced an order worth roughly 2.0 billion Swedish kronor from a United States colocation provider for a modular artificial intelligence cooling solution. Capacity expansions generally follow backlog, and a backlog of that shape explains this one.

    The same quarterly communication was headlined around exceptional demand alongside external headwinds currently affecting profitability, which is the more instructive half of the picture. Order growth of that magnitude is expensive to serve. Ramping a new production line, qualifying a chiller laboratory, staffing test stands and training a service organization all consume cash before the first unit ships. Investors should expect the Daleville expansion to weigh on margins before it helps them, and should watch conversion of backlog into delivered revenue rather than intake alone.

    There is also a customer-concentration question embedded in any business growing this way. Large colocation and hyperscale orders are lumpy. A vendor that builds capacity against a small number of very large commitments is exposed if one of those programs slips, and artificial intelligence buildout schedules have proven willing to slip.

    The Scarce Input Is Trained People

    The presence of the Munters Service Academy on the expanded campus is a more revealing detail than the square footage. Frank Pellegrino, the incoming president of the business area, framed manufacturing setup as only part of the equation and pointed to skilled people, technical knowledge and service capability. That is an accurate description of where the sector’s real bottleneck has migrated.

    Liquid cooling changes the skills required in a data hall. Pumped coolant, quick-disconnect fittings and leak detection are not the same discipline as ducted air, and the installed base of technicians trained on the older approach is much larger than the base trained on the newer one. A vendor that trains its own service workforce, and its customers’ staff, controls a resource that cannot be bought with capital on a short timeline.

    For Botetourt County, close to 600 jobs in precision mechanical manufacturing is a meaningful anchor, and it places industrial employment in a part of Virginia that has not captured much of the data center boom’s direct benefit. Whether the expansion adds materially to that headcount is not stated. The figure given is the current workforce, not a hiring target.

    Background

    Munters is a Swedish climate-technology company, headquartered in Stockholm and publicly listed, that builds equipment for controlling temperature and humidity across industries. Its Data Center Technologies unit has grown into one of the sector’s more prominent specialist cooling suppliers as computing density has risen, and it operates five dedicated manufacturing facilities for that business globally. Daleville is the largest of them.

    Virginia has been the center of gravity for American data center development for more than two decades, with Northern Virginia hosting the largest concentration of capacity in the world. The artificial intelligence buildout has strained the supply chain that serves it. Chips draw attention, but the unglamorous mechanical inputs, chillers, air handlers, switchgear and transformers, have become the practical limit on how quickly capacity comes online. Placing manufacturing close to that demand is a response to the problem rather than a solution to it, and several equipment vendors have moved in the same direction.

    Sources

    Source: Munters completes expansion of data center cooling campus in Daleville, Virginia — the company’s September 11, 2026 announcement detailing the expanded campus, its product lines and the start of local chiller production.

  • Modine Becomes Modexus Solutions in Cooling Pivot

    Modine Becomes Modexus Solutions in Cooling Pivot

    TL;DR · 30-second read

    The Short Version

    Modine, a Wisconsin manufacturer more than a century old, plans to change its name to Modexus Solutions.

    The company is splitting in two. The half that makes parts for cars and trucks is being spun out and combined with another company, Gentherm, on October 1. What stays behind is the business that cools buildings and, increasingly, the huge computer warehouses that run artificial intelligence.

    Those computers run hot enough that hauling the heat away is now a business of its own. Shareholders still have to approve the new name.

    Modine Manufacturing said on September 10 that it will rename itself Modexus Solutions once it completes the spinoff of its Performance Technologies business and that unit’s merger with Gentherm. The plan appeared in an 8-K filed the same day, with the press release attached as Exhibit 99.1, and in a parallel Form 425 covering merger communications. Gentherm shareholders approved the transaction at a special meeting on September 10, and the parties expect to close on October 1, 2026, subject to customary closing conditions.

    The renamed company will keep the MOD ticker on the New York Stock Exchange. Neil D. Brinker and Michael Lucareli stay on as chief executive and chief financial officer, alongside the current board. The name itself needs a separate shareholder vote to amend Modine’s articles of incorporation, and the company expects to call that special meeting within three months of closing. Investing.com reported that Modine shares rose after the rebranding plan was announced.

    Executive Summary

    The announcement is the branding capstone on a structural change that has been in motion for months. Platinum SpinCo Inc., a wholly owned Modine subsidiary holding the Performance Technologies business, filed a Form 10 registration statement that the SEC declared effective; Gentherm filed a Form S-4 that was also declared effective and includes the proxy statement mailed to its shareholders. That combination of filings describes a spinoff followed immediately by a share-issuing merger, the standard plumbing for separating a division and delivering it to another public company’s shareholder base.

    What remains at Racine after October 1 is a heat-transfer business aimed at buildings and computing equipment rather than vehicles. Modine’s own framing in the release is careful: it calls the result a “diversified thermal management company serving high-growth markets, including data center cooling, commercial HVAC and refrigeration.” That is diversification across end markets inside one discipline, not diversification across industries.

    For buyers of data center cooling equipment, nothing changes on October 1 except the letterhead, eventually. For investors, the change is more consequential. A company whose results were previously smoothed by two loosely correlated cycles, vehicles and buildings, now reports against one demand story that the market has already decided is about artificial intelligence.

    The Word “Diversified” Is Doing Real Work Here

    Read the release closely and you find the company resisting the label the market is likely to apply to it. Modine describes Modexus Solutions as diversified. The market will describe it as a cooling company. Both can be true, and the gap between them is where the investment case gets argued.

    The remaining portfolio spans three end markets with genuinely different rhythms. Commercial HVAC, meaning the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems in schools, warehouses and offices, tracks construction and retrofit budgets. Refrigeration follows food retail and cold chain spending. Data center cooling follows hyperscale and colocation capital expenditure, which has been running on a very different clock. Those cycles do not move together, and that is a legitimate defense against the pure-play characterization.

    What is harder to dispute is where the incremental attention goes. Nobody re-rates a thermal manufacturer on refrigeration. The company put data center cooling first in its own list of high-growth markets, and it is the market that determines how the shares trade. Losing the vehicular business removes a hedge, and a drag, at the same time.

    Heat Is the Constraint, and That Is the Whole Opportunity

    The reason cooling has become interesting is arithmetic. A rack of servers running artificial intelligence training workloads can draw several times the power of a conventional rack, and essentially all of that power turns into heat that has to leave the building. Past a certain density, blowing cold air over the equipment stops working, and operators move to liquid cooling, where coolant is piped directly to the chips. That transition changes what a data center buys, from fans and air handlers to pumps, heat exchangers, coolant distribution units and controls.

    Companies with heat-exchanger engineering in their DNA are well placed for that shift, and Modine has more than a century of it. But the same shift has attracted every large thermal and electrical infrastructure vendor, from power-and-cooling specialists to the big building systems conglomerates. Incumbency in air-cooled equipment does not automatically convert into share in liquid-cooled equipment, because the buying decision moves closer to the chip vendor’s reference design and the customer set concentrates into a handful of very large, very demanding accounts.

    That concentration cuts both ways. Large orders arrive in size and give good visibility, then they pause in size too. A cooling business inside a diversified manufacturer can absorb a lumpy quarter. A cooling business that is most of the story cannot.

    What Shareholders Are Actually Being Asked to Approve

    There are two separate votes here, and conflating them is easy. Gentherm’s shareholders have already voted, on September 10, and approved the transaction. Modine’s shareholders have not yet voted on the name, because under Wisconsin law changing the corporate name means amending the articles of incorporation, which requires shareholder approval. That meeting is expected within three months of closing, with no date set.

    This is worth understanding for what it is: low-risk housekeeping, not a referendum on strategy. The strategic decision was made when the transaction was signed. Shareholders who dislike the direction have no mechanism in the name vote to reverse it. Continuity reinforces the point, since the ticker stays MOD, the chief executive and chief financial officer stay in place, and the board stays intact.

    Brinker’s reference to the “80/20 framework” is the substantive line in the release. It refers to the Pareto discipline of concentrating resources on the minority of products and customers that generate the majority of profit, and pruning the rest. Applied to a company that has just shed its largest structural distraction, it signals more portfolio surgery ahead, not less. That is a promise about future decisions rather than a disclosed plan, and it should be read as such.

    Rebrands Signal Intent; Results Settle It

    Corporate renamings after a separation are conventional, and usually sensible. A name tied to a legacy business becomes a liability when that business has left the building, and sales teams, recruiters and analysts all benefit from a label that matches what the company now does. The cost is the erosion of a century of brand equity, which the release explicitly tries to preserve by keeping the Mod- root.

    The risk is one of expectation management. Naming yourself after a repositioning invites the market to price the repositioning immediately, while the operating proof arrives over several reporting periods. Separations consume management attention, generate one-time costs, and leave stranded overhead behind. The company’s own forward-looking statement section lists exactly these hazards: unexpected costs and charges, delay or failure in integration, difficulty achieving synergies, and inability to retain key personnel.

    The fair assessment is that this announcement is a well-executed milestone in a transaction that is nearly done, not new information about the business. It confirms timing and leadership continuity. It does not, on its own, tell anyone how much cooling equipment Modexus Solutions will ship in 2027.

    Background

    Modine has operated from Racine, Wisconsin for more than a century, building heat-transfer equipment for applications where thermal failure is not an option. The company employs more than 13,000 people across North America, South America, Europe and Asia, and its stated purpose, “Engineering a Cleaner, Healthier World,” spans heating, cooling and ventilation products aimed at cutting energy and water use, lowering emissions and using more benign refrigerants.

    For most of its modern history the company straddled two worlds: thermal systems for vehicles, sold to automotive and commercial vehicle manufacturers, and heating, cooling and ventilation equipment for buildings. The Gentherm transaction separates those worlds. Gentherm is a supplier of thermal management technology to the automotive sector, which makes it a natural home for the vehicular assets. What remains with the renamed company is the building and computing side, where data center cooling has become the demand story that matters most to how the shares are valued.

    Sources

    Source: Modine to Become Modexus Solutions, Marking Next Chapter as Diversified Thermal Management Solutions Company, the September 10, 2026 announcement of the planned rebrand following the Performance Technologies spinoff and Gentherm merger.

    Primary sources: Modine Manufacturing Company, Form 8-K filed September 10, 2026; Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K, the Modexus Solutions announcement; Modine Manufacturing Company, Form 425 filed September 10, 2026; Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 425.

  • LONGWELL’s FanWall Claim: 38% Less CRAH Fan Energy

    LONGWELL’s FanWall Claim: 38% Less CRAH Fan Energy

    Ningbo Longwell Electric Technology Co., Ltd. (LONGWELL), a Chinese fan and motor manufacturer founded in 1990, announced on 31 August 2026 an AI-era data center cooling line built around its LWBE3G EC plug-fan platform. Deployed as a FanWall array — a bank of smaller fans replacing one large fan — the company reports a 38% reduction in CRAH fan energy consumption, a 6.5 dB(A) noise reduction, and no field failures on the project cited.

    The work was done with what LONGWELL describes as one of the world’s top three precision-cooling OEMs, which it does not name. LONGWELL says it delivered 12 engineering samples in 35 days, passed DV/PV testing 100% on the first attempt, and went from specification validation to mass production in 90 days. The first customer order was 1,500 units; 2025 deliveries exceeded 80,000 units under a 2025–2027 framework agreement with a stated annual minimum of 60,000 units.

    Executive Summary

    The headline number is a 38% cut in the electricity drawn by the fans inside CRAH units — the computer-room air handlers that push cold air through a data hall. LONGWELL also reports that the CRAH system’s contribution to the facility energy-efficiency metric improved from a 1.42 baseline to 1.28 on the project in question. Fan power is one of the largest non-IT loads in an air-cooled hall, so a double-digit percentage cut there is economically meaningful even though it changes nothing about the servers themselves.

    The second, arguably more consequential claim is about speed. LONGWELL states that the incumbent European supplier on the same program had scheduled 14 months of development plus six months of production ramp, while LONGWELL completed spec-validation-to-mass-production in 90 days. If that comparison holds up, it says something about how quickly the precision-cooling supply chain can be re-sourced when AI buildouts compress every schedule — and about competitive pressure on established European fan vendors.

    The context is thermal density. LONGWELL cites rack loads moving from 15–20 kW to 60–100 kW in two years, with next-generation platforms exceeding 100 kW. That trajectory is usually cited as the argument for liquid cooling. This announcement makes the opposite-facing point: the air side of the plant still exists, still consumes power, and still has efficiency headroom that operators can capture without re-plumbing a building.

    Fan Power Is the Quiet Line Item in Data Center Energy

    In an air-cooled data hall, electricity splits between the IT equipment and everything that supports it: chillers, pumps, power conversion losses, and air movement. The air-movement share is easy to overlook because no single fan looks expensive, but CRAH fans run continuously, at every hour of every day, for the life of the facility. That duty cycle is what turns a percentage into money. A 38% reduction on a load that never switches off compounds differently from a 38% reduction on something that runs during business hours.

    The physics behind FanWall designs is not exotic and is worth stating plainly for non-specialists: fan power rises steeply with speed, so several smaller fans each running slower can move the same air volume for less power than one large fan running hard. EC — electronically commutated — motors, which use electronic control rather than mechanical brushes, make that easier by allowing precise, continuous speed modulation instead of on-off cycling. The array also degrades gracefully; LONGWELL cites automatic N+1 failover, meaning the array carries a spare fan’s worth of capacity so a single failure does not force a shutdown.

    None of that is unique to LONGWELL. FanWall architectures and EC motors are established practice across precision cooling, which is precisely why the interesting question in this release is not whether the approach works but what specifically LONGWELL’s platform was replacing, and at what operating point. The release’s own footnote says the comparative energy data refer to the equipment displaced on that project.

    Ninety Days Versus Twenty Months: The Real Competitive Story

    Component qualification is normally the slowest, least glamorous part of building cooling equipment. An OEM cannot simply swap a fan; it must re-run design verification and production validation testing, requalify acoustics and vibration, and re-certify the assembled unit. That is why the incumbent’s quoted 14-month development plus six-month ramp is not obviously unreasonable — it is roughly the industry’s normal cadence. LONGWELL’s claim is that it collapsed the same sequence to 90 days, with 12 engineering samples inside 35 days and a first-pass DV/PV result.

    For buyers, first-pass DV/PV is the detail worth noticing. Test cycles fail routinely, and each failure costs weeks. A supplier that passes on the first attempt is signalling that its engineering samples already matched the specification, which is a manufacturing-maturity claim as much as a design one. For the precision-cooling OEMs racing to fill AI-driven order books, a supplier who can compress twenty months into three is solving a scheduling problem, not just a component-cost problem.

    The competitive read is straightforward and should be stated without overreach: European fan suppliers have long held strong positions in HVAC and data center air movement on the strength of engineering depth and long qualification relationships. Speed of response is now being priced alongside that. The release does not claim the incumbent’s product was technically inferior — only that its timeline was longer on this program — and it explicitly disclaims any affiliation or endorsement.

    What the 38% Establishes, and What It Does Not

    LONGWELL is unusually candid in its own disclaimer: the performance data correspond to a specific project and a specific operating point, and final selection must be confirmed against operating point, voltage and control scheme, mounting arrangement, and project validation. That caveat is doing real work. Fan performance is highly sensitive to the pressure the fan works against, and a figure measured in one CRAH cabinet at one airflow does not transfer automatically to another.

    The 1.42-to-1.28 figure deserves particular care. Those numbers are in the numerical range of PUE — power usage effectiveness, the ratio of total facility power to IT power, where 1.0 is theoretically perfect — but the release describes this as the CRAH system’s contribution to the efficiency metric on this project, not a whole-facility PUE for a named site. Read as a subsystem-level improvement it is a coherent result; read as a facility PUE it would be a much larger claim than the release supports. The distinction matters for anyone modelling savings.

    The commercial figures are the most independently checkable part of the announcement, in the sense that they describe behaviour rather than test conditions. A first order of 1,500 units expanding to more than 80,000 units delivered in 2025, under a 2025–2027 framework with a 60,000-unit annual minimum, is a customer voting with volume. It is not third-party verification of 38%, but repeat purchasing at that scale is a stronger signal than a datasheet.

    Air Cooling Does Not Disappear Because Liquid Arrives

    The prevailing narrative says racks above roughly 60–100 kW must go to liquid cooling, and for the densest AI training clusters that is broadly where the industry is heading. But the transition is neither instant nor total. Direct-to-chip liquid cooling typically removes most, not all, of a rack’s heat; the remainder still leaves via air. Storage, networking, and general-purpose compute remain air-cooled. Retrofit halls with existing CRAH fleets will keep running for years on depreciation schedules that do not care about GPU roadmaps. Condensers and cooling towers — LONGWELL’s LWAE3G axial fan line targets these — are needed in liquid-cooled plants too.

    That is the strongest version of this announcement’s editorial premise: air-side efficiency has remaining headroom precisely because it is being treated as legacy. Capital and attention are flowing toward liquid, which leaves ordinary optimisation of the air path comparatively under-exploited. Operators who cannot re-plumb a building this year can still change fans.

    The counter-risk for a supplier in this position is that it is selling into a segment whose long-run share of new-build capacity may shrink even as its absolute installed base stays large. LONGWELL’s stated data center fan capacity of more than 120,000 units annually against a 60,000-unit contractual minimum suggests it has built for growth beyond this one customer; whether that growth comes from new AI halls, retrofits of existing ones, or the condenser and cooling-tower side of liquid-cooled plants is not something the release addresses.

    Background

    Precision cooling — the equipment class covering CRAC and CRAH units that hold data halls at controlled temperature and humidity — has historically been dominated by a small group of global OEMs, which in turn buy fans and motors from a specialist supply chain long anchored by European manufacturers. Fans are qualified rather than simply purchased: each one must pass verification testing inside the OEM’s cabinet, so incumbency has been durable and switching slow.

    The AI compute buildout has strained that arrangement. As per-rack heat loads climbed from the 15–20 kW typical of general-purpose servers toward 60–100 kW and beyond for accelerated computing, OEMs have needed higher-performance air movement on schedules far shorter than the industry’s traditional multi-year qualification cadence. LONGWELL, a Ningbo-area manufacturer founded in 1990 and long active in HVAC-R and industrial fans, is one of several Asian suppliers positioning against that compressed timeline — an announcement that is as much about procurement velocity as about thermodynamics.

    Source: La technologie FanWall de LONGWELL EC permet de réduire de 38 % la consommation énergétique des ventilateurs CRAH des centres de données IA de nouvelle génération — PR Newswire release, dated 31 August 2026 from Ningbo, China, detailing LONGWELL’s LWBE3G EC plug-fan platform, its reported CRAH fan energy and acoustic results, and the volumes shipped under a 2025–2027 framework agreement.

  • Modine’s $4B Backlog vs. Vertiv’s 12% Slide: Cooling Splits

    Modine’s $4B Backlog vs. Vertiv’s 12% Slide: Cooling Splits

    Two thermal-management suppliers moved in opposite directions in the same news cycle. Aggregated coverage carried by Google News reports that shares of Vertiv Holdings (NYSE: VRT), one of the largest vendors of data center power and cooling systems, fell 12%, under a headline asking whether the decline is a buying opportunity. A separate item reports that Modine Manufacturing (NYSE: MOD) gained on a $4 billion data center figure.

    The available source material is limited to those two aggregated headlines. The Modine headline is truncated in the feed as “$4B data center c…” and no underlying release text, dated filing, customer name, or delivery window accompanies either item.

    Executive Summary

    The news itself is small: one stock down 12%, another up on a large dollar figure. What makes it worth an article is the divergence. Vertiv and Modine sell into the same demand driver — the buildout of AI data centers, whose dense computing racks generate far more heat per square foot than conventional servers and increasingly require liquid cooling rather than air. If that demand were the only variable, the two share prices would tend to move together. They did not.

    The most defensible reading is that investors are no longer pricing thermal-management companies purely on demand. They are pricing the gap between demand and what is already embedded in each share price. A supplier can book record orders and still see its stock fall if the market had assumed even more; a smaller supplier can rerate sharply on a single large figure because far less was assumed to begin with.

    For infrastructure buyers, none of this changes physics or lead times. But supplier share prices influence capital costs, capacity expansion decisions and acquisition activity, so procurement teams have a legitimate reason to watch the tape — without mistaking it for operational news.

    Order Books and Share Prices Answer Different Questions

    A backlog or contract figure answers a backward-looking question: what has a customer already committed to buy? A share price answers a forward-looking one: is the expected future stream of profits better or worse than what buyers had already paid for? These can diverge for long stretches, and the reported moves are consistent with exactly that. A $4 billion data center figure at Modine is large relative to the company’s historical association with vehicular and building HVAC heat exchangers, so it plausibly resets expectations upward. Vertiv, by contrast, has been among the most visible listed proxies for AI infrastructure spending, which means a good deal of optimism can already sit inside the price before any new information arrives.

    This is the ordinary mechanics of expectations, not evidence that AI cooling demand is weakening. Nothing in the source material states why Vertiv shares fell. A 12% single-move decline in a high-expectation industrial name can follow guidance, margin commentary, a customer concentration disclosure, a sector-wide rotation, or an analyst action. Attributing it to any one cause without the underlying report would be speculation.

    Liquid Cooling Is Real Revenue, Not Just a Theme

    The substantive point beneath both headlines is that thermal management has moved from a line item to a gating factor. When a rack of AI accelerators draws many times the power of a traditional server rack, air alone stops working economically well before it stops working physically. That pushes operators toward direct-to-chip cold plates, rear-door heat exchangers and, at the extreme, immersion — all of which involve pumps, manifolds, coolant distribution units and heat rejection equipment that did not exist in volume in the previous generation of data centers.

    That shift widens the addressable market and, importantly, widens the supplier set. Cooling was historically dominated by a small group of specialists selling precision air-conditioning units. Liquid cooling draws in companies with heat-exchanger and fluid-handling engineering heritage from adjacent industries. Modine’s move is the clearest illustration in this news cycle of an adjacent-industry entrant being repriced as a data center supplier. The competitive implication for incumbents is not that demand disappears; it is that the premium for scarcity may compress as more credible suppliers qualify.

    What Procurement Teams Should Actually Do With This

    Buyers should separate two signals. The first is capacity: a supplier reporting a very large committed order book is telling you its factories and engineering teams are spoken for, which is a lead-time warning as much as a growth story. The second is durability: a supplier whose equity falls sharply is facing a higher cost of capital, which can constrain the very capacity expansion buyers are counting on. Neither headline here is severe enough to warrant requalifying vendors, but both argue for the standard disciplines — dual sourcing on long-lead thermal components, contractual delivery remedies, and design choices that do not lock a hall to a single vendor’s coolant distribution architecture.

    For investors, the fair conclusion from two aggregated headlines is narrow: the market is differentiating within a trade it previously bought as a block. Whether Vertiv’s decline is an entry point or a repricing of expectations cannot be determined from the material available, and the source headline poses that as a question rather than answering it.

    Background

    Data center cooling was for decades a specialist niche dominated by precision air-conditioning vendors serving halls of relatively uniform, air-cooled servers. The economics were stable and the engineering incremental. The arrival of high-density AI computing changed that: rack power densities rose to levels where air cooling becomes impractical, pushing operators toward liquid-based approaches and turning cooling from a supporting utility into a constraint on how much computing a site can host.

    That transition has made listed suppliers of power and thermal equipment, Vertiv among the most prominent, into widely traded proxies for AI capital spending, while opening the market to manufacturers such as Modine whose heat-exchanger engineering originated in other industries. Because both the demand and the expectations attached to it have risen quickly, share prices in this group have become sensitive to small revisions in outlook — the backdrop against which these two contrasting headlines should be read.

    Source: Vertiv Shares Slide 12%: Is the AI Data Center Play Worth Buying on the Dip? — aggregated market coverage of a 12% decline in Vertiv shares, read alongside a separate item reporting Modine Manufacturing gains on a $4 billion data center figure.

  • Systemair’s SEK 60M Finland Order and Air Cooling’s Hybrid Future

    Systemair’s SEK 60M Finland Order and Air Cooling’s Hybrid Future

    Swedish ventilation manufacturer Systemair AB (NASDAQ Stockholm: SYSR) said on 27 August 2026 that it has received an order for air-based data centre cooling solutions worth approximately SEK 60 million (EUR 5.4 million). The order is for a new data centre in Finland, and deliveries are scheduled to begin at the start of 2027.

    The scope comprises Geniox Tera Fanwall units — modular air-handling assemblies with integrated controls and sensors — which will be produced at Systemair’s facility in Turkey. The Finnish site will recover waste heat from the cooling units and feed it into the local district heating network. Systemair announced the order the same day it published its Q1 2026/27 interim report.

    Executive Summary

    On its face this is a routine equipment win: a mid-cap European manufacturer books a single order equal to roughly half a percent of its SEK 12.5 billion in annual sales. What makes it worth reading closely is the technology choice and the geography. In a market narrative dominated by direct-to-chip liquid cooling for AI accelerators, a hyperscale-grade Finnish facility is still buying a substantial package of air handling capacity — and buying it a year or more before the building is expected to carry load.

    Systemair’s CEO, Robert Larsson, framed the demand explicitly in AI terms: “Mission-critical hyperscale data centres require cooling solutions that combine high energy efficiency with exceptional reliability – and we are seeing a growing demand for energy-efficient data centre cooling as AI-related investments continue to expand.” That is a vendor’s characterisation of its own order book rather than an independently verified market statistic, but it is consistent with what the order itself shows: air-side equipment is being specified into the same buildings that host dense compute.

    The second detail that matters is heat reuse. The Finnish site will export recovered heat into district heating. That turns a waste stream into a local utility input and, in Nordic markets, into part of the permitting and community-relations case for building at all. For buyers and investors, the practical takeaway is that thermal equipment orders — which are placed early, are hard to fake, and are denominated in real currency — are one of the cleaner leading indicators available for where AI-era capacity is genuinely being built.

    Air Cooling Is Not Being Retired — It Is Being Reassigned

    The dominant story of the past two years has been liquid: cold plates bolted directly to accelerators, rear-door heat exchangers, and immersion tanks, all pitched as the only way to handle rack densities that air physically cannot. That physics is real. What it does not mean is that air handling leaves the building. Liquid loops remove heat from the chips; they do not condition the room, they do not handle the substantial share of IT load that remains air-cooled, and they do not manage the electrical rooms, battery rooms, and support spaces that sit alongside the white space. A facility running direct-to-chip liquid on its densest halls still needs a competent air-side system — often a smaller one per megawatt of IT, but not a token one.

    That is the reading this order supports. Fanwall units — arrays of multiple smaller fans working in parallel behind a common wall, rather than one large fan — are a design choice about redundancy and part-load efficiency as much as raw capacity. If one fan fails, the array degrades rather than stops, and at low load the array can run fewer fans closer to their efficient operating point. Systemair describes the Geniox Tera Fanwall line as flexible, compact and modular with integrated controls and sensors. Those are the attributes an operator specifies when it expects the load profile to change over the life of the building — which is precisely the situation of anyone commissioning a hall in 2027 without knowing what silicon will occupy it in 2030.

    The honest framing, then, is hybrid rather than replacement. The competitive question for air-side vendors is not whether they get designed out, but what share of the thermal budget they retain per megawatt, and whether they can sell the controls and sensing layer alongside the boxes. Systemair’s release emphasises integrated controls; that is where differentiation and margin tend to migrate once the mechanical hardware itself becomes a commodity.

    Why Finland, and Why the Heat Goes Back Out the Door

    Finland has been an attractive Nordic data centre location for the same cluster of reasons that keep drawing operators north: a cold climate that extends the hours per year when outside air alone can do the cooling work, a grid with a substantial low-carbon component, political stability, and mature fibre routes into the rest of Europe. Cold ambient air is not a marketing point — it is an operating-cost line. Every hour a facility can cool with fans instead of compressors is an hour of materially lower energy draw.

    The waste-heat detail is the more strategically interesting one. District heating — networks of insulated pipes that distribute hot water to buildings across a town or city district — is widespread across the Nordics in a way it is not in most of the United States. That existing pipe network is what makes data centre heat reuse economically viable rather than merely aspirational: the offtake infrastructure already exists and already has customers. Recovering heat from cooling units and pushing it into that network converts a disposal problem into a saleable or at least socially creditable output.

    This matters commercially because heat reuse is increasingly part of how large facilities earn their social and regulatory licence. Data centres compete for grid connections, land, and public tolerance against other users of the same scarce power. An operator that can point to a heat offtake arrangement has a materially stronger position in that competition than one that vents everything to atmosphere. For equipment vendors, that creates a design requirement — cooling units specified with heat recovery in mind — that favours suppliers who already build for European efficiency standards.

    Thermal Orders as a Leading Indicator of Where AI Capacity Lands

    Announced AI capacity and delivered AI capacity are different quantities, and the gap between them is where a great deal of market confusion lives. Letters of intent, memoranda of understanding, and headline gigawatt figures are cheap to issue and frequently slip or quietly vanish. A signed equipment order with a delivery schedule is a harder object. Someone has committed capital, a manufacturing slot has been reserved, and a delivery date has been fixed — here, deliveries commencing at the beginning of 2027 for a facility that must therefore be structurally ready to receive them.

    Long-lead mechanical and electrical equipment is ordered early precisely because it is long-lead. That timing property is what makes it useful as a signal: cooling and power orders surface roughly a build cycle ahead of the racks going in. Read across enough vendors, this order flow is arguably a better map of real capacity formation than announcement volume. The caveat is that a single order tells you almost nothing about aggregate demand — it is one data point from one supplier, and vendors publish the wins rather than the losses.

    There is a related claim worth handling carefully. A separate forecast published the same day projects the generator cooling systems market reaching USD 5.03 billion by 2031, up from USD 3.76 billion in 2026, a 6.0% compound annual growth rate. That is a genuinely adjacent market but not the same one: generator cooling refers to the thermal management of electrical generating machinery, not the conditioning of data centre halls, and much of that market sits in power generation broadly rather than in data centres specifically. It is also a vendor-published research forecast, sold as a report, with methodology that is not open to inspection. It is reasonable to note the directional overlap — more compute means more backup and prime power, which means more machinery that needs cooling — and unreasonable to treat a 6.0% CAGR in that segment as validation of Systemair’s order or of AI-driven data centre cooling demand generally. The two releases share a date and a theme; they do not corroborate each other.

    What SEK 60 Million Does and Does Not Prove

    Scale discipline is worth applying. Systemair reported sales of SEK 12.5 billion in the 2025/26 financial year, with approximately 7,400 employees across 51 countries. A SEK 60 million order is therefore roughly half a percent of a single year’s revenue — around 1.8% of the SEK 3,281 million in net sales the company reported for Q1 2026/27 (May–July), which grew 6% organically. This is a meaningful, publishable win. It is not a company-transforming contract, and the release does not claim it to be.

    What the order does demonstrate is qualification: a manufacturer whose core identity is building ventilation for offices, schools, and industry has been specified into what its own CEO characterises as mission-critical hyperscale infrastructure. That is a credential with option value. Data centre buyers are conservative and repeat-purchase heavily from vendors that have already performed; the first order into a programme is frequently worth more than its face value. Systemair’s own framing — “a diversified customer base” — suggests it views data centres as one growth vertical rather than a pivot.

    What the release does not establish is equally worth stating plainly. It names no customer, no facility capacity, no contract margin, and no follow-on volume. It does not say whether the site also deploys liquid cooling, which would be the single most informative fact for the hybrid thesis. It does not disclose the terms of the district heating arrangement. And production in Turkey for delivery into Finland introduces a cross-border logistics and trade-policy exposure that the release does not address. None of that is unusual for an order announcement of this size — but it does mean this is a data point, not a proof.

    Background

    Systemair was founded in 1974 and has grown into one of Europe’s larger ventilation manufacturers, building air handling units, fans, air curtains and related climate equipment for buildings of every kind. Its historic market is ordinary commercial and industrial property — offices, schools, retail, factories — sold through the Systemair, Frico, Fantech and Menerga brands across 51 countries. The company is listed on Nasdaq Stockholm’s Large Cap list and reported SEK 12.5 billion of sales with roughly 7,400 employees in the 2025/26 financial year.

    Data centres represent an adjacent but distinct opportunity for such manufacturers. The engineering is related, but the reliability expectations, controls sophistication, and procurement cycles are different, and qualification with hyperscale-grade buyers is slow to win and sticky once won. The Nordics have meanwhile become a favoured region for large facilities: cold ambient air reduces the hours per year that mechanical refrigeration must run, grids carry a significant low-carbon share, and established district heating networks give operators somewhere useful to send waste heat — a combination that shows up directly in the specification of this Finnish project.

    Source: Systemair wins data centre cooling order worth SEK 60 million — the company’s 27 August 2026 announcement of an approximately SEK 60 million (EUR 5.4 million) order for air-based cooling at a new Finnish data centre, with deliveries starting in early 2027.