<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="https://www.jain.com/assets/img/6adafce5-1.1"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>climate change &#8211; Jain.com</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Data centers, connectivity, and security — news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Rising Heat and Humidity Are Shrinking the Free-Cooling Window for Data Centers</title>
		<link>/rising-heat-humidity-data-center-free-cooling-efficiency/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepak Jain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cooling Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data center cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water usage]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/rising-heat-humidity-data-center-free-cooling-efficiency/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rising heat and humidity are eroding free cooling, the practice of using outside air to cool data centers, new research reported by Phys.org warns. As climates warm, operators face higher cooling energy, more water use, and harder siting decisions — making climate a first-order design constraint.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="jain-post-grid">
<div class="jain-post-main">
<p>Research highlighted by Phys.org on June 26, 2026 warns that rising global temperatures and humidity are undermining one of the data center industry&#8217;s most important energy-efficiency strategies: free cooling, the practice of using cool outside air or water to remove server heat instead of running energy-hungry mechanical chillers. As more hours of the year become too hot or too humid for outside air to do the job, facilities worldwide face growing cooling energy demand.</p>
<p>The finding lands at a sensitive moment. Data center construction is accelerating to serve AI workloads, and cooling is typically the largest energy consumer in a facility after the IT equipment itself — so any climate-driven loss of free-cooling hours compounds an already steep power challenge.</p>
<h2>Executive Summary</h2>
<p>The core claim is straightforward: free cooling only works when the outside environment is cooler and drier than the conditions servers require, and climate change is steadily reducing the number of hours per year when that is true. Heat is only half the story — humidity matters just as much, because evaporative cooling systems, which cool air by evaporating water, lose effectiveness as the air becomes more saturated. Regions that were designed around thousands of free-cooling hours a year are watching that budget shrink.</p>
<p>Why it matters: efficiency assumptions made at design time are baked into a data center for decades. A facility engineered in a climate that no longer exists will either consume more energy than its models promised, lean harder on water, or require retrofit investment. For an industry under scrutiny over electricity and water consumption, the research reframes climate not as a sustainability talking point but as an engineering input — one that belongs in site selection, cooling-system choice, and capacity planning from day one.</p>
<h2>Free Cooling Was the Industry&#8217;s Efficiency Workhorse</h2>
<p>For the past fifteen years, the biggest gains in data center efficiency — reflected in falling PUE, the ratio of total facility power to IT power — came largely from using the outdoors as a heat sink. Air-side economizers pull in filtered outside air; water-side economizers and evaporative systems use cooling towers to shed heat with modest energy input. Hyperscale operators famously sited facilities in cool climates precisely to maximize these hours.</p>
<p>The research reported by Phys.org attacks the durability of that playbook. If the number of hours cool and dry enough for economization declines, chillers run more, and the efficiency gap between a well-sited facility and a poorly sited one narrows in the wrong direction. The gains of the last decade were real, but they were partly a loan from a stable climate — and the terms of that loan are changing.</p>
<h2>Humidity Is the Underappreciated Variable</h2>
<p>Public discussion of data center cooling fixates on temperature, but wet-bulb temperature — a combined measure of heat and humidity that sets the floor for evaporative cooling — is the more binding constraint. When wet-bulb temperatures rise, evaporative systems must work harder and consume more water for less cooling effect, and in extreme conditions they cannot reach the setpoints servers need at all. That pushes operators back toward mechanical refrigeration exactly when grid demand for air conditioning also peaks.</p>
<p>This has a second-order consequence: the trade-off between energy and water gets sharper. Evaporative cooling saves electricity but consumes water; dry coolers and chillers save water but consume electricity. Rising humidity degrades the attractiveness of the water-based option in many regions, forcing a choice between two increasingly expensive resources — often in communities already contesting data center water use.</p>
<h2>Winners: Liquid Cooling, Cool Geographies, and Honest Modeling</h2>
<p>If outside air can carry less of the load, the premium shifts to technologies that tolerate warmer heat rejection. Direct-to-chip liquid cooling and immersion cooling move heat in water or fluid rather than air, allowing higher operating temperatures and, in many designs, year-round heat rejection without compressors even in warm climates. The AI build-out was already pushing the industry toward liquid cooling for density reasons; climate trends add an efficiency rationale.</p>
<p>Geography gains value too. Sites in cool, dry, or high-latitude regions — the Nordics, parts of Canada, high-altitude locations — become relatively more attractive, though they bring their own constraints in connectivity, latency, and power availability. And engineering firms that model cooling against forward-looking climate projections rather than historical weather files gain a real advantage: a 25-year asset should be designed for the climate of 2040, not 2010.</p>
<h2>Risks: Stranded Efficiency and Rising Operating Costs</h2>
<p>The losers in this shift are facilities whose economics depend on free-cooling assumptions that no longer hold — particularly older air-cooled sites in regions warming fastest. Their operating costs drift upward without any change in workload, and their sustainability reporting deteriorates through no operational fault. For colocation providers, whose customers increasingly scrutinize PUE and water metrics in procurement, that drift is a competitive problem, not just an engineering one.</p>
<p>There is also a grid-level risk. The hours when data centers lose free cooling are the same hot hours when regional grids are most stressed. Climate-driven cooling demand is therefore correlated demand — it arrives when power is scarcest and most carbon-intensive, which is precisely the scenario utilities and regulators planning for data center growth need to model.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>Data center cooling has evolved through distinct eras. Early facilities ran cold and relied almost entirely on mechanical chillers. From roughly 2010 onward, hyperscale operators drove a revolution in economization — siting in cool climates, using outside air and evaporative systems, and widening acceptable server temperature ranges — which pushed the best facilities&#8217; PUE from around 2.0 toward 1.1. That efficiency story became central to the industry&#8217;s answer to critics of its energy footprint.</p>
<p>The current AI build-out is testing every part of that model: rack power densities have jumped severalfold, cooling loads are climbing, and communities are scrutinizing both electricity and water consumption. Research showing that climate change is eroding free cooling adds a structural pressure on top of a cyclical boom — and helps explain the industry&#8217;s accelerating shift toward liquid cooling and climate-aware site selection.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMigAFBVV95cUxQeHdSZEpBd2k1ZDhydzdBVk5qcEhnTWItX1BpUEozSXJoczNFakpfbVFHb0R1ZUc0VEt6enZFWUcya2JVbVhRNGs4YXY1MERFaDZYQ0VvTW1GaWdueWZtNk1EcFoxRS0wWVowamFFZ0lnRzh5aEZNVnN3NXlvLWgxdA?oc=5">Rising heat and humidity challenge energy-efficient data center cooling worldwide</a> — Phys.org report, June 26, 2026, on research into climate-driven erosion of data center free-cooling potential.</p>
</div>
<aside class="jain-rail">
<section class="jain-gaps" aria-label="What the release does not say">
<p class="jain-gaps-kicker"><img src="https://www.jain.com/assets/img/dbaaff79-26a0.png" alt="⚠" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> What They Aren’t Saying</p>
<h2>What the Release Doesn&#8217;t Say</h2>
<p>The syndicated summary available to us is thin, and material questions remain that the underlying research would need to answer. Which regions lose the most free-cooling hours, and on what timescale — is this a 2030 problem or a 2050 one? What climate scenarios and emissions pathways were assumed, and how sensitive are the results to them? The magnitude matters enormously: a few percent more chiller hours is a cost line; a structural loss of economization in major markets is a design revolution.</p>
<p>Also unquantified here: the projected energy and water penalty in absolute terms, whether the analysis accounts for newer high-temperature liquid-cooling designs that relax the constraint, and what the findings imply for the industry&#8217;s public efficiency commitments, many of which rest on PUE trajectories assuming historical climate. Readers should consult the original study for its methodology, regional breakdowns, and confidence intervals before drawing investment conclusions.</p>
</section>
<section class="jain-faq">
<h2>Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<h3>What is free cooling in a data center?</h3>
<p>Free cooling (economization) uses cool outside air or water to remove server heat instead of running mechanical chillers. When outdoor conditions are cool and dry enough, it dramatically cuts cooling electricity, which is typically the largest facility energy use after the IT equipment itself.</p>
<h3>What did the research reported by Phys.org find?</h3>
<p>According to the June 26, 2026 report, rising global heat and humidity are reducing the hours per year when outside conditions support energy-efficient free cooling, challenging data center efficiency worldwide and pushing facilities toward more mechanical cooling.</p>
<h3>Why does humidity matter as much as temperature for cooling?</h3>
<p>Evaporative cooling works by evaporating water into air, and humid air absorbs less moisture. The binding limit is wet-bulb temperature, which combines heat and humidity. As wet-bulb temperatures rise, evaporative systems deliver less cooling per unit of water and energy.</p>
<h3>What is PUE and why is it relevant here?</h3>
<p>Power Usage Effectiveness is total facility power divided by IT power; a PUE of 1.2 means 20% overhead beyond the servers. Free cooling drove much of the industry&#8217;s PUE improvement, so losing free-cooling hours pushes PUE — and energy bills — back up.</p>
<h3>Which data centers are most exposed to this trend?</h3>
<p>Older air-cooled facilities in regions that are warming or humidifying fastest, and any site whose energy and cost models assumed historical weather patterns. Facilities designed with generous free-cooling assumptions face the largest gap between promised and actual efficiency.</p>
<h3>Does this make liquid cooling more attractive?</h3>
<p>Yes. Direct-to-chip and immersion cooling move heat in fluid rather than air and tolerate warmer heat-rejection temperatures, so they depend less on cool outside air. AI-driven rack densities were already pushing liquid cooling; climate trends strengthen the case.</p>
<h3>How does this interact with the AI data center boom?</h3>
<p>AI construction is adding cooling demand at record pace just as climate erodes the cheapest way to meet it. Higher-density AI racks produce more concentrated heat, and any climate-driven loss of free cooling compounds the industry&#8217;s already steep power challenge.</p>
<h3>Will data centers use more water because of this?</h3>
<p>The trade-off sharpens. Evaporative cooling saves electricity but consumes water, and rising humidity makes it less effective per gallon. Operators must choose between more water, more electricity for chillers and dry coolers, or investment in liquid cooling designs.</p>
<h3>Does climate change affect where new data centers get built?</h3>
<p>Increasingly, yes. Cool, dry, or high-latitude regions gain relative advantage for cooling, though siting still balances power availability, network latency, land, and local approval. Forward-looking climate projections are becoming a standard site-selection input.</p>
<h3>What is wet-bulb temperature?</h3>
<p>It is the lowest temperature achievable by evaporating water into the air — effectively a combined heat-and-humidity reading. It sets the performance floor for evaporative and many free-cooling systems, which is why humid heat is harder on data centers than dry heat.</p>
<h3>Can existing data centers be retrofitted for hotter climates?</h3>
<p>Often, but at a cost. Options include adding chiller capacity, converting to water-side economization or dry coolers, raising allowable server inlet temperatures, and introducing liquid cooling. Retrofits compete for capital with new builds and may require downtime planning.</p>
<h3>Does running servers at warmer temperatures help?</h3>
<p>Yes, within limits. Industry guidance has gradually widened acceptable server inlet temperature and humidity ranges, and every degree of tolerance extends free-cooling hours. But hardware reliability, warranty terms, and high-density AI gear constrain how far operators can push.</p>
<h3>What should data center buyers and colocation customers ask providers?</h3>
<p>Ask how cooling was modeled — historical weather or forward climate projections — what the facility&#8217;s PUE and water usage look like in peak summer conditions rather than annual averages, and what headroom exists if local free-cooling hours keep declining.</p>
<h3>What are the grid implications of losing free cooling?</h3>
<p>The hours when data centers need the most mechanical cooling are the same hot afternoons when grids are most stressed by air conditioning. That correlated peak demand is a growing concern for utilities planning around data center load growth.</p>
</section>
</aside>
</div>
<p><script type="application/ld+json">{"@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [{"@type": "NewsArticle", "headline": "Rising Heat and Humidity Are Shrinking the Free-Cooling Window for Data Centers", "description": "Rising heat and humidity are eroding free cooling, the practice of using outside air to cool data centers, new research reported by Phys.org warns. As climates warm, operators face higher cooling energy, more water use, and harder siting decisions \u2014 making climate a first-order design constraint.", "image": ["/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/rising-heat-humidity-data-center-cooling.png"], "author": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "jain.com Editorial"}, "datePublished": "2026-08-23T08:08:15.223319+00:00"}, {"@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [{"@type": "Question", "name": "What is free cooling in a data center?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Free cooling (economization) uses cool outside air or water to remove server heat instead of running mechanical chillers. When outdoor conditions are cool and dry enough, it dramatically cuts cooling electricity, which is typically the largest facility energy use after the IT equipment itself."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What did the research reported by Phys.org find?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "According to the June 26, 2026 report, rising global heat and humidity are reducing the hours per year when outside conditions support energy-efficient free cooling, challenging data center efficiency worldwide and pushing facilities toward more mechanical cooling."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Why does humidity matter as much as temperature for cooling?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Evaporative cooling works by evaporating water into air, and humid air absorbs less moisture. The binding limit is wet-bulb temperature, which combines heat and humidity. As wet-bulb temperatures rise, evaporative systems deliver less cooling per unit of water and energy."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What is PUE and why is it relevant here?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Power Usage Effectiveness is total facility power divided by IT power; a PUE of 1.2 means 20% overhead beyond the servers. Free cooling drove much of the industry's PUE improvement, so losing free-cooling hours pushes PUE \u2014 and energy bills \u2014 back up."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Which data centers are most exposed to this trend?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Older air-cooled facilities in regions that are warming or humidifying fastest, and any site whose energy and cost models assumed historical weather patterns. Facilities designed with generous free-cooling assumptions face the largest gap between promised and actual efficiency."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Does this make liquid cooling more attractive?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes. Direct-to-chip and immersion cooling move heat in fluid rather than air and tolerate warmer heat-rejection temperatures, so they depend less on cool outside air. AI-driven rack densities were already pushing liquid cooling; climate trends strengthen the case."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "How does this interact with the AI data center boom?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "AI construction is adding cooling demand at record pace just as climate erodes the cheapest way to meet it. Higher-density AI racks produce more concentrated heat, and any climate-driven loss of free cooling compounds the industry's already steep power challenge."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Will data centers use more water because of this?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "The trade-off sharpens. Evaporative cooling saves electricity but consumes water, and rising humidity makes it less effective per gallon. Operators must choose between more water, more electricity for chillers and dry coolers, or investment in liquid cooling designs."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Does climate change affect where new data centers get built?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Increasingly, yes. Cool, dry, or high-latitude regions gain relative advantage for cooling, though siting still balances power availability, network latency, land, and local approval. Forward-looking climate projections are becoming a standard site-selection input."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What is wet-bulb temperature?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "It is the lowest temperature achievable by evaporating water into the air \u2014 effectively a combined heat-and-humidity reading. It sets the performance floor for evaporative and many free-cooling systems, which is why humid heat is harder on data centers than dry heat."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Can existing data centers be retrofitted for hotter climates?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Often, but at a cost. Options include adding chiller capacity, converting to water-side economization or dry coolers, raising allowable server inlet temperatures, and introducing liquid cooling. Retrofits compete for capital with new builds and may require downtime planning."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Does running servers at warmer temperatures help?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes, within limits. Industry guidance has gradually widened acceptable server inlet temperature and humidity ranges, and every degree of tolerance extends free-cooling hours. But hardware reliability, warranty terms, and high-density AI gear constrain how far operators can push."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What should data center buyers and colocation customers ask providers?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Ask how cooling was modeled \u2014 historical weather or forward climate projections \u2014 what the facility's PUE and water usage look like in peak summer conditions rather than annual averages, and what headroom exists if local free-cooling hours keep declining."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What are the grid implications of losing free cooling?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "The hours when data centers need the most mechanical cooling are the same hot afternoons when grids are most stressed by air conditioning. That correlated peak demand is a growing concern for utilities planning around data center load growth."}}]}]}</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
