<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="https://www.jain.com/assets/img/6adafce5-1.1"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gartner &#8211; Jain.com</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/gartner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Data centers, connectivity, and security — news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Gartner: Data Center Electricity Use to Grow 26% in 2026</title>
		<link>/gartner-data-center-electricity-consumption-26-percent-growth-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepak Jain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Power Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data center power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/gartner-data-center-electricity-consumption-26-percent-growth-2026/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gartner forecasts data-center electricity consumption will grow 26% in 2026, an acceleration driven by AI workloads that utilities must now plan around. We analyze what the projection means for grid planners, data-center operators, and enterprise buyers — and the questions it leaves unanswered.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="jain-post-grid">
<div class="jain-post-main">
<p>Research and advisory firm Gartner has published a forecast projecting that data-center electricity consumption will grow 26% in 2026. The figure, released in June 2026, puts a number on what utilities, grid operators, and data-center builders have been experiencing on the ground: power — not land, capital, or chips — has become the binding constraint on digital-infrastructure growth.</p>
<h2>Executive Summary</h2>
<p>Gartner&#8217;s headline claim is simple: the electricity consumed by data centers will rise 26% in 2026. For context, most mature electricity systems in developed economies have spent two decades planning around annual demand growth in the low single digits. A single customer class growing 26% in one year is the kind of step-change that utility resource plans — documents typically written on five-to-fifteen-year horizons — were not designed to absorb.</p>
<p>The forecast matters less as a precise number than as a planning signal. If even a substantial fraction of that growth materializes, it shapes generation procurement, transmission buildout, interconnection queues, and electricity rates for every other customer sharing the grid. For data-center operators and their customers, it also signals that access to secured, deliverable power will continue to separate projects that get built from projects that wait.</p>
<h2>A 26% Jump Is a Planning Problem, Not Just a Number</h2>
<p>Electric utilities plan in decades. Building a new gas plant, a transmission line, or a large substation typically takes years of permitting, procurement, and construction. Demand that grows 26% in a single year — even within one customer segment — compresses those timelines past what traditional integrated resource planning can handle. The practical consequence is already visible across the industry: multi-year interconnection queues (the waiting list to connect large new loads or generators to the grid), utilities demanding long-term take-or-pay commitments from data-center customers, and regulators debating who bears the cost if forecast demand fails to show up.</p>
<p>The forecast, in other words, is best read as a statement about mismatch: digital infrastructure now moves at software-industry speed, while the electricity system that feeds it still moves at heavy-civil-engineering speed. Closing that gap — through faster permitting, on-site generation, or demand flexibility — is the defining infrastructure challenge the number points to.</p>
<h2>AI Is Rewriting the Load Curve</h2>
<p>Growth of this magnitude is not organic expansion of traditional enterprise computing. Conventional data-center workloads — web serving, databases, storage — grew steadily for years while efficiency gains (better chips, better cooling, higher utilization) kept electricity demand roughly flat. What changed is accelerated computing: AI training and inference run on dense GPU racks that can draw several times the power of traditional server racks and tend to run at sustained high utilization rather than in daily peaks and troughs.</p>
<p>That load profile is a mixed blessing for utilities. Flat, predictable, around-the-clock demand is easier to serve than spiky demand and can improve grid economics by spreading fixed costs over more kilowatt-hours. But it also removes slack: a grid serving large always-on loads has less headroom for extreme weather events and less tolerance for generation shortfalls. How much of Gartner&#8217;s projected growth is firm, flexible, or interruptible will matter as much as the total.</p>
<h2>Winners, Losers, and the Power Value Chain</h2>
<p>If the forecast is directionally right, the beneficiaries extend well beyond data-center operators. Makers of transformers, switchgear, generators, and cooling equipment — many already quoting extended lead times — see demand visibility measured in years. Generation developers, from gas turbines to nuclear restarts to utility-scale renewables paired with storage, gain a creditworthy customer class willing to sign long-dated contracts. Utilities in data-center-heavy regions gain load growth after decades of stagnation, though with real execution and rate-design risk.</p>
<p>The squeezed parties are those competing for the same electrons and equipment: other large industrial loads, smaller colocation players without utility relationships, and — if cost allocation is handled poorly — residential ratepayers. For data-center operators themselves, the forecast reinforces an emerging hierarchy: companies holding contracted, deliverable power capacity own an appreciating asset, while those still in interconnection queues hold an option of uncertain value.</p>
<h2>Treat the Number as a Signal, Not a Certainty</h2>
<p>A forecast is a model, and this one — as syndicated — arrives without its assumptions attached. Projections of AI-driven power demand have varied widely across analysts, and history urges caution: early-2000s forecasts of runaway internet power consumption overshot badly because they underestimated efficiency gains. Chip-level performance-per-watt improvements, smarter model architectures, and rising inference efficiency could all bend the curve; conversely, faster-than-expected enterprise AI adoption could steepen it.</p>
<p>The even-handed reading is that Gartner&#8217;s 26% figure is a credible-sounding midpoint from an established research house, but its value depends on methodology the public headline does not disclose — baseline year, geographic scope, and workload assumptions among them. Planners should treat it as one scenario input, not a settled fact.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>Data-center electricity demand was, for roughly a decade before the AI era, a story of successful restraint: workloads migrated into ever-more-efficient hyperscale facilities, and total consumption grew far more slowly than computing output. That equilibrium broke with the generative-AI buildout that began in earnest in 2023, as operators raced to deploy GPU clusters whose power density and utilization patterns overwhelmed the old efficiency offsets. Since then, power availability has displaced real estate as the industry&#8217;s primary constraint, and forecasts from analysts, utilities, and government agencies have been repeatedly revised upward.</p>
<p>Gartner, a research and advisory firm whose projections are widely used in enterprise technology planning, publishes recurring forecasts on data-center spending and infrastructure. Its June 2026 electricity-consumption forecast lands amid active debate among utilities, regulators, and operators over how much of the projected AI load will actually materialize — and who should pay to serve it.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMizAFBVV95cUxQbHhFVVBuNTFUZ2lFUmwxQ1pmcjhJQVlfWUJmTlQ3Z3VrYnFzVnZXQVltcF9lWklxcXA4engtUDFzQ0tDekFZY016SWhNN2VwQ0ZzZ3JzMFN6VmVHaVpmaS13NzN3LTJ5T19WdHlBSFRLbnBOOEVPZTFqNmNmUDlpdE9hVE44dUhsaEZvcnpkUmFNQ0Z1bWtXU2hrdHczXzBHRmFfRmJCaXZXUFVhTExpbFNxbjJidEpDVXJ3ckRZLWI0OGR6b19uakV0Z3I?oc=5">Gartner Says Data Center Electricity Consumption to Grow 26% in 2026</a> — Gartner&#8217;s June 2026 forecast announcement, as syndicated via Google News.</p>
</div>
<aside class="jain-rail">
<section class="jain-gaps" aria-label="What the release does not say">
<p class="jain-gaps-kicker"><img src="https://www.jain.com/assets/img/dbaaff79-26a0.png" alt="⚠" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> What They Aren’t Saying</p>
<h2>What the Release Doesn&#8217;t Say</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Baseline and absolute scale:</strong> 26% growth from what? The headline gives no starting figure in terawatt-hours or gigawatts, so the absolute increment — the number utilities actually plan around — is not stated.</li>
<li><strong>Scope and methodology:</strong> The syndicated release does not specify whether the forecast is global or regional, whether it covers enterprise, colocation, and hyperscale facilities alike, or how AI versus traditional workloads split the growth.</li>
<li><strong>Assumptions:</strong> Nothing public here discloses assumed efficiency gains, chip supply, AI adoption rates, or grid-constraint effects — nor how this figure compares with Gartner&#8217;s own prior forecasts or with competing estimates from other analysts and agencies.</li>
<li><strong>Downstream effects:</strong> The release leaves unanswered what the growth implies for electricity prices, generation mix, and whether supply can physically be delivered in 2026, given multi-year lead times for grid equipment and interconnection.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="jain-faq">
<h2>Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<h3>What did Gartner forecast about data-center electricity consumption?</h3>
<p>Gartner projected in June 2026 that electricity consumption by data centers will grow 26% in 2026, a sharp acceleration attributable to the ongoing buildout of AI computing infrastructure.</p>
<h3>Why is data-center electricity demand growing so fast?</h3>
<p>The main driver is accelerated computing for AI. GPU-dense racks used for training and inference draw several times the power of traditional server racks and run at sustained high utilization, on top of continued growth in cloud and enterprise workloads.</p>
<h3>Why does a 26% annual increase matter to utilities?</h3>
<p>Most developed-economy grids plan around low-single-digit annual demand growth on multi-year horizons. A customer class growing 26% in one year outpaces the timelines for building generation, transmission, and substations, forcing utilities to rework resource plans.</p>
<h3>Is the 26% figure global or regional?</h3>
<p>The syndicated headline does not say. Gartner forecasts are typically worldwide, but the public release available here does not specify geographic scope, baseline consumption, or how growth is distributed across regions — a material gap for planners.</p>
<h3>How much electricity do data centers actually use?</h3>
<p>The release does not state a baseline figure, and estimates vary across analysts. What the forecast communicates is the growth rate — 26% in one year — which is the planning signal regardless of the exact starting point.</p>
<h3>What is an interconnection queue and why is it relevant?</h3>
<p>It is the waiting list for connecting large new loads or generators to the grid, involving studies and upgrades that can take years. Rapid demand growth lengthens these queues, so projects with already-secured power connections gain a decisive advantage.</p>
<h3>Will this growth raise electricity bills for ordinary consumers?</h3>
<p>Potentially, if grid-upgrade costs are spread across all ratepayers rather than assigned to the data-center customers driving them. Regulators in several markets are actively debating cost-allocation rules; the forecast itself does not address pricing.</p>
<h3>Could efficiency gains slow this growth?</h3>
<p>Yes. Chip performance-per-watt, cooling efficiency, and leaner AI models could all bend the curve, as efficiency did after overheated internet-power forecasts in the early 2000s. The headline does not disclose what efficiency assumptions Gartner built in.</p>
<h3>Who benefits if the forecast proves accurate?</h3>
<p>Power-equipment makers (transformers, switchgear, cooling), generation developers, utilities in data-center-heavy regions, and operators holding contracted power capacity. Suppliers with long lead-time products gain years of demand visibility.</p>
<h3>Who is at risk from this demand surge?</h3>
<p>Other large industrial electricity users competing for the same capacity, smaller data-center players stuck in interconnection queues, and ratepayers if cost allocation is mishandled. Grids with less headroom also face greater reliability stress during extreme weather.</p>
<h3>How reliable are forecasts like this one?</h3>
<p>Gartner is an established research house, but any forecast depends on assumptions — AI adoption rates, chip supply, efficiency trends — that the public headline does not disclose. Analyst projections of AI power demand currently span a wide range, so treat it as one scenario input.</p>
<h3>What does this mean for companies buying cloud or colocation capacity?</h3>
<p>Expect tighter capacity in power-constrained markets, longer lead times for large deployments, and pricing that increasingly reflects the cost of secured power. Buyers with multi-year capacity needs benefit from contracting early and asking providers how their power is sourced.</p>
<h3>How does AI training differ from inference in its power impact?</h3>
<p>Training concentrates enormous power in single campuses for months at a time, while inference spreads steadier load across many facilities as AI features reach production. The release does not break down how each contributes to the projected 26% growth.</p>
<h3>What can data-center operators do about power constraints?</h3>
<p>Common responses include long-term power purchase agreements, on-site or behind-the-meter generation, siting in regions with surplus capacity, higher-efficiency cooling such as liquid cooling, and participating in demand-response programs where workloads allow flexibility.</p>
<h3>Who is Gartner and why do its forecasts carry weight?</h3>
<p>Gartner is one of the largest technology research and advisory firms, and its forecasts are widely used in enterprise IT budgeting and vendor planning. Its numbers often become reference points in industry discussion, which is why a single growth figure draws broad attention.</p>
</section>
</aside>
</div>
<p><script type="application/ld+json">{"@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [{"@type": "NewsArticle", "headline": "Gartner: Data Center Electricity Use to Grow 26% in 2026", "description": "Gartner forecasts data-center electricity consumption will grow 26% in 2026, an acceleration driven by AI workloads that utilities must now plan around. We analyze what the projection means for grid planners, data-center operators, and enterprise buyers \u2014 and the questions it leaves unanswered.", "image": ["/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/gartner-data-center-electricity-growth-2026.png"], "author": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "jain.com Editorial"}, "datePublished": "2026-08-23T04:09:27.512617+00:00"}, {"@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [{"@type": "Question", "name": "What did Gartner forecast about data-center electricity consumption?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Gartner projected in June 2026 that electricity consumption by data centers will grow 26% in 2026, a sharp acceleration attributable to the ongoing buildout of AI computing infrastructure."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Why is data-center electricity demand growing so fast?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "The main driver is accelerated computing for AI. GPU-dense racks used for training and inference draw several times the power of traditional server racks and run at sustained high utilization, on top of continued growth in cloud and enterprise workloads."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Why does a 26% annual increase matter to utilities?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Most developed-economy grids plan around low-single-digit annual demand growth on multi-year horizons. A customer class growing 26% in one year outpaces the timelines for building generation, transmission, and substations, forcing utilities to rework resource plans."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Is the 26% figure global or regional?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "The syndicated headline does not say. Gartner forecasts are typically worldwide, but the public release available here does not specify geographic scope, baseline consumption, or how growth is distributed across regions \u2014 a material gap for planners."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "How much electricity do data centers actually use?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "The release does not state a baseline figure, and estimates vary across analysts. What the forecast communicates is the growth rate \u2014 26% in one year \u2014 which is the planning signal regardless of the exact starting point."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What is an interconnection queue and why is it relevant?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "It is the waiting list for connecting large new loads or generators to the grid, involving studies and upgrades that can take years. Rapid demand growth lengthens these queues, so projects with already-secured power connections gain a decisive advantage."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Will this growth raise electricity bills for ordinary consumers?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Potentially, if grid-upgrade costs are spread across all ratepayers rather than assigned to the data-center customers driving them. Regulators in several markets are actively debating cost-allocation rules; the forecast itself does not address pricing."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Could efficiency gains slow this growth?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes. Chip performance-per-watt, cooling efficiency, and leaner AI models could all bend the curve, as efficiency did after overheated internet-power forecasts in the early 2000s. The headline does not disclose what efficiency assumptions Gartner built in."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Who benefits if the forecast proves accurate?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Power-equipment makers (transformers, switchgear, cooling), generation developers, utilities in data-center-heavy regions, and operators holding contracted power capacity. Suppliers with long lead-time products gain years of demand visibility."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Who is at risk from this demand surge?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Other large industrial electricity users competing for the same capacity, smaller data-center players stuck in interconnection queues, and ratepayers if cost allocation is mishandled. Grids with less headroom also face greater reliability stress during extreme weather."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "How reliable are forecasts like this one?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Gartner is an established research house, but any forecast depends on assumptions \u2014 AI adoption rates, chip supply, efficiency trends \u2014 that the public headline does not disclose. Analyst projections of AI power demand currently span a wide range, so treat it as one scenario input."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What does this mean for companies buying cloud or colocation capacity?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Expect tighter capacity in power-constrained markets, longer lead times for large deployments, and pricing that increasingly reflects the cost of secured power. Buyers with multi-year capacity needs benefit from contracting early and asking providers how their power is sourced."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "How does AI training differ from inference in its power impact?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Training concentrates enormous power in single campuses for months at a time, while inference spreads steadier load across many facilities as AI features reach production. The release does not break down how each contributes to the projected 26% growth."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What can data-center operators do about power constraints?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Common responses include long-term power purchase agreements, on-site or behind-the-meter generation, siting in regions with surplus capacity, higher-efficiency cooling such as liquid cooling, and participating in demand-response programs where workloads allow flexibility."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Who is Gartner and why do its forecasts carry weight?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Gartner is one of the largest technology research and advisory firms, and its forecasts are widely used in enterprise IT budgeting and vendor planning. Its numbers often become reference points in industry discussion, which is why a single growth figure draws broad attention."}}]}]}</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
