<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="https://www.jain.com/assets/img/6adafce5-1.1"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Power Efficiency &#8211; Jain.com</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/power-efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Data centers, connectivity, and security — news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 11:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Marvell&#8217;s 102.4Tbps 2nm Optics Make AI Scale-Out a Watts-Per-Bit Problem</title>
		<link>/marvell-2nm-optical-interconnect-102-4tbps-co-packaged-optics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepak Jain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 11:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI data centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-packaged optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custom silicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marvell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical interconnect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Efficiency]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/marvell-2nm-optical-interconnect-102-4tbps-co-packaged-optics/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Marvell demonstrated 2nm optical interconnects for AI data centers, including 102.4Tbps co-packaged optics at 200G and 400G per lane. The company calls it an industry first. The demo matters less for raw speed than for energy per bit — the constraint now shaping how hyperscalers scale out AI racks past 800G.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="jain-post-grid">
<div class="jain-post-main">
<section class="jain-tldr" aria-label="Plain-English summary">
<p class="jain-tldr-kicker">TL;DR · 30-second read</p>
<h2>The Short Version</h2>
<p>Computers that train artificial intelligence have to talk to each other constantly, and today most of that traffic still travels over copper wiring that burns electricity and fades over distance.</p>
<p>Marvell has shown chips that move the traffic as light instead, built on the most advanced chipmaking process now available. One demonstration moves data fast enough to copy well over a thousand high-definition movies every second.</p>
<p>The point is not speed. Light uses less power per unit of data, and electricity is the hard limit on how big these computing sites can get.</p>
</section>
<p>Marvell Technology has demonstrated optical interconnect silicon built on a 2nm process for AI data centers, including a co-packaged optics engine running at 102.4 terabits per second and supporting 200G and 400G per electrical lane. 24/7 Wall St. reported on September 21 that the company described the work as an industry first and said it is &#8220;pushing the envelope of what is possible in optical tech,&#8221; with shares trading around $248 in Monday&#8217;s first hour, up 1.5% on the session.</p>
<p>The demonstration sits on top of a quarter Marvell has already reported: record fiscal second-quarter revenue of $2.739 billion, up 37% year over year, with data center revenue of $2.17 billion, up 46%, now 79% of the total. Guidance filed August 27 put the current quarter at $3.150 billion plus or minus 5%, and raised the fiscal 2027 and fiscal 2028 outlooks. Management has scheduled an Investor Day for October 6 in New York.</p>
<h2>Executive Summary</h2>
<p>The headline number is 102.4 Tbps of co-packaged optics, but the operational story is the denominator. Co-packaged optics — CPO — moves the optical engine off the front panel of a switch and onto the same substrate as the switch or accelerator silicon. That shortens the electrical path a signal has to travel before it becomes light, and shortening that path is primarily a way to spend fewer watts per bit, not a way to go faster.</p>
<p>That distinction matters because a rack has a fixed power envelope set by the building, not by the silicon roadmap. Every watt the network consumes inside that envelope is a watt unavailable to the accelerators the network exists to connect. As Marvell steps its lane rates from the 800G generation deployed today, past the 1.6T generation now ramping, toward 3.2T, copper&#8217;s usable reach shrinks and more of the interconnect budget migrates to optics — which is exactly where the energy cost concentrates.</p>
<p>The demo also gives silicon substance to forecasts management has already made. On the earnings call, CEO Matt Murphy said &#8220;the magnitude of our scale-up optics opportunity next year is much larger than we thought just a quarter ago,&#8221; and that Marvell expects scale-across bandwidth requirements to exceed 10 times current front-end data center interconnect networks. What a demonstration does not establish is yield, production timing, field serviceability or a named customer.</p>
<h2>Optics Stopped Being a Bandwidth Problem and Became a Power Budget</h2>
<p>Here is the mechanism the 102.4 Tbps figure is really about. In a conventional switch, optical modules plug into the faceplate, and the switch chip&#8217;s electrical lanes have to drive signals across the package, the circuit board and a connector before they reach the laser. Each of those hops costs energy and frequently requires retiming circuitry to clean the signal up. Co-packaged optics collapses that journey by placing the optical engine on the same substrate as the switch or accelerator die — in Marvell&#8217;s framing, shortening data pathways and cutting energy per bit.</p>
<p>The lane rates are what force the issue. By demonstrating 200G and 400G per lane, Marvell is aiming past the 800G optics deployed across hyperscale fleets today and the 1.6T generation now ramping, at the 3.2T generation beyond it. As per-lane signalling rates climb, the distance a passive copper cable can carry a clean signal falls, which is why the release notes copper runs out of reach at the speeds these clusters require. Once copper is out, the interconnect is optical by default — and its power draw becomes a line item in the rack budget rather than a rounding error.</p>
<p>Who this lands on is specific. A facility commits a fixed number of megawatts to a hall; a rack design commits a fixed number of kilowatts to a cabinet. If the network layer connecting tens of thousands of accelerators across multiple racks consumes a smaller share of that envelope, the operator either fits more compute per rack or fewer racks per hall. That arithmetic is the reason a demo with no customer attached still moves the roadmap conversation for switch vendors, optical module suppliers, rack integrators and the people underwriting the power contracts underneath them.</p>
<h2>A 79% Data Center Mix Makes the Optical Roadmap the Whole Company</h2>
<p>Marvell&#8217;s reported quarter explains why an engineering milestone carries this much weight. Revenue of $2.739 billion, up 37% year over year, came with data center revenue of $2.17 billion, up 46% and equal to 79% of the total. Non-GAAP earnings were $0.94 per share, and the company guided the following quarter to $3.150 billion plus or minus 5% with earnings of $1.10 plus or minus $0.05, while raising its fiscal 2027 and fiscal 2028 outlooks in the August 27 filing.</p>
<p>A business that derives roughly four dollars in five from data centers has effectively converted itself into a single-cycle instrument. That is an advantage while hyperscale capital expenditure expands and a concentrated exposure when it does not. It also means the optical and custom silicon roadmaps are not adjacent product lines — they are the earnings model, which is why a 2nm demonstration is treated as corroborating evidence for guidance rather than as a lab result.</p>
<p>The market has priced that trajectory rather than waiting on it. The stock has advanced 192% year to date, carries a market capitalisation near $217.4 billion and a forward price-to-earnings multiple around 58, against an average analyst target of $289 with 39 buy or strong-buy ratings and five holds. A multiple set that far ahead of current earnings is a statement about execution risk: the roadmap has to arrive roughly on the schedule management has sketched, and the October 6 Investor Day is where that schedule gets specified.</p>
<h2>What Being First Actually Buys — and What It Costs</h2>
<p>The optical push runs alongside a custom silicon business that has been given an unusual structure. Management disclosed an expanded partnership with Google that includes a warrant allowing Google to acquire up to 7% of Marvell&#8217;s shares, tied to revenue milestones, and Murphy said custom revenue should more than double in fiscal 2028. Linking a customer&#8217;s equity upside to the volume it buys aligns incentives efficiently, but it also converts a commercial relationship into potential dilution for existing holders, on terms whose triggers Marvell has not published. A separate expanded NVLink Fusion arrangement with NVIDIA positions Marvell in scale-up switching, and the earlier Celestial AI photonic fabric acquisition, closed February 2, 2026, and the XConn Technologies chiplet connectivity deal, closed February 10, 2026, supply the building blocks.</p>
<p>Against Broadcom, the incumbent in high-speed networking silicon, first-to-2nm is a claim on the next design cycle rather than on current sockets. Hyperscalers qualify interconnect years ahead of deployment, so the practical value of a demonstration is optionality in roadmap reviews happening now for clusters that power up later. It converts into revenue only if the process yields at volume, the thermal and reliability behaviour survives qualification, and a named platform adopts it.</p>
<p>The demand side of that equation is funding itself in size, if not always for named projects: Amazon&#8217;s Form 8-K filed September 14 records the close of £4.242 billion of notes maturing between 2029 and 2045, with net proceeds of roughly £4.235 billion and no specific use of proceeds identified in the filing. Capital of that scale is available to the companies buying interconnect; whether it reaches co-packaged optics specifically is the question Marvell has not yet answered with a customer name.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>Marvell Technology designs custom silicon and networking chips for hyperscale data centers. Its portfolio spans custom AI accelerators built to a single customer&#8217;s specification, electro-optics, the digital signal processors that drive high-speed optical links, and data center interconnect products that carry traffic between facilities. Over the past two years the company has reweighted itself decisively toward that market, with the data center segment now accounting for 79% of revenue.</p>
<p>Interconnect has become one of the more consequential bottlenecks in AI infrastructure. Training and inference clusters link tens of thousands of accelerators, and the network that connects them has to scale in step with the compute — first inside a rack, then across racks, then between buildings. Marvell has assembled capability for that through acquisition as well as internal development, closing the Celestial AI photonic fabric deal on February 2, 2026 and the XConn Technologies chiplet connectivity deal on February 10, 2026, while expanding partnerships with NVIDIA on scale-up switching and with Google on custom silicon. Its principal competitor in high-speed networking silicon is Broadcom.</p>
<section class="jain-sources" aria-label="Sources">
<h2>Sources</h2>
<p>Source: <a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMitgFBVV95cUxNc1ZEdVU1STM0bE5DN3BzekFLQWtEcHo1MXZhQlBuVndXZWR4QTlNbG1SZkowUEs1dDNZX3VQYm9kemdQZFYyN3Ztb3NsTHBJQ1B0UlRhbTdPNjloRWNmZlJoWlNpTHpxQUVqUkVKRjdtcHZuQW94M0pEQTk5dzZhYVdKR0pkelB6SjJYQzJ6TFRYWUdvVVJtc0FORjdhd1VwcFpQR1V6OTRNMmVZTk5JWGNpWUxGdw?oc=5">Marvell Smashes the AI &lsquo;Power Wall&rsquo; with Industry-First 2nm Optical Chips</a> &mdash; 24/7 Wall St. report on Marvell&#8217;s 2nm optical interconnect demonstrations, its fiscal second-quarter results and its custom silicon partnerships.</p>
<p>Primary sources: <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1018724/000110465926107526/tm2624614d5_8k.htm">Amazon.com, Inc., Form 8-K filed September 14, 2026</a> (close of £4.242 billion of notes due 2029 through 2045; net proceeds of approximately £4.235 billion).</p>
</section>
</div>
<aside class="jain-rail">
<section class="jain-gaps" aria-label="What the release does not say">
<p class="jain-gaps-kicker">⚠ What They Aren’t Saying</p>
<h2>What the Release Doesn&#8217;t Say</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Energy per bit.</strong> Marvell has framed co-packaged optics as an answer to power constraints but has not published a picojoule-per-bit figure, or a comparison against the pluggable optics the technology would displace. Without that number, the efficiency claim cannot be sized.</li>
<li><strong>From demo to production.</strong> The company has not said when 2nm optical parts reach volume production, which foundry capacity is allocated to them, what yields look like, or whether the demonstrated 102.4 Tbps engine is a product or a technology vehicle.</li>
<li><strong>Customers and platforms.</strong> No hyperscaler design win has been attached to the co-packaged optics demonstration, and Marvell has not said whether the technology lands first in switching or alongside custom accelerators.</li>
<li><strong>Serviceability.</strong> Pluggable modules can be swapped by a technician in minutes; an optical engine soldered to a switch substrate cannot. Marvell has not detailed laser reliability, field-replacement strategy or the failure economics operators would inherit.</li>
<li><strong>Warrant terms.</strong> The revenue milestones that trigger Google&#8217;s right to acquire up to 7% of the company, the exercise price and the vesting schedule have not been laid out publicly.</li>
<li><strong>Fiscal 2029.</strong> Management has deferred the long-term revenue envelope, the scale-up optics trajectory and the custom silicon outlook to the October 6 Investor Day.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="jain-faq">
<h2>Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<h3>What exactly did Marvell announce?</h3>
<p>Marvell demonstrated optical interconnect silicon built on a 2nm manufacturing process for AI data centers, including a co-packaged optics engine running at 102.4 terabits per second and supporting 200G and 400G per electrical lane. The company describes it as an industry first.</p>
<h3>What is co-packaged optics?</h3>
<p>Co-packaged optics, or CPO, places the component that converts electrical signals into light onto the same substrate as the switch or accelerator chip, instead of in a module plugged into the front of the box. The shorter electrical path uses less energy per bit of data moved.</p>
<h3>Why is 102.4 terabits per second significant?</h3>
<p>It is roughly 12.8 terabytes of data every second through a single switch package. At that scale, the practical constraint is no longer whether the link is fast enough but how many watts the link consumes inside a rack&#8217;s fixed power budget.</p>
<h3>Why is this a power story rather than a bandwidth story?</h3>
<p>A data hall commits a fixed number of megawatts, and a rack a fixed number of kilowatts. Every watt the network consumes is a watt unavailable to the accelerators it connects, so reducing energy per bit directly increases how much compute fits in the same building.</p>
<h3>What does 2nm mean in this context?</h3>
<p>It refers to the semiconductor manufacturing process node used to build the chip. Smaller nodes generally pack more transistors into the same area and do the same work with less power, which is the property that matters most for interconnect silicon.</p>
<h3>What are 200G and 400G per lane?</h3>
<p>A lane is a single electrical signalling path. Today&#8217;s mainstream optics run 800G links; the generation now ramping is 1.6T. Doubling per-lane rates to 200G and 400G is what enables the coming 3.2T generation Marvell is aiming at.</p>
<h3>Why not just use copper cables?</h3>
<p>Copper works well over short distances, but as per-lane signalling rates rise, the distance copper can carry a clean signal falls. Marvell notes copper runs out of reach at the speeds required to link tens of thousands of accelerators across multiple racks.</p>
<h3>How large is Marvell&#x27;s data center business?</h3>
<p>Data center revenue was $2.17 billion in the most recent reported quarter, up 46% year over year and equal to 79% of total revenue of $2.739 billion. That concentration makes the AI buildout cycle effectively the company&#8217;s business model.</p>
<h3>What did Marvell guide for the current quarter?</h3>
<p>Revenue of $3.150 billion plus or minus 5%, with non-GAAP earnings of $1.10 per share plus or minus $0.05. The August 27 filing also raised the fiscal 2027 and fiscal 2028 outlooks.</p>
<h3>What is the Google warrant?</h3>
<p>As part of an expanded partnership, Google received a warrant to acquire up to 7% of Marvell&#8217;s shares, tied to revenue milestones. It aligns a large customer with Marvell&#8217;s growth, but represents potential dilution for existing shareholders on terms not publicly detailed.</p>
<h3>How does this affect Broadcom?</h3>
<p>Broadcom is the incumbent in high-speed networking silicon. Being first to demonstrate 2nm optics is a claim on the next design cycle rather than on current sockets, since hyperscalers qualify interconnect years ahead of deployment.</p>
<h3>What did the Celestial AI and XConn acquisitions add?</h3>
<p>Celestial AI brought photonic fabric technology and closed February 2, 2026; XConn Technologies brought chiplet connectivity and closed February 10, 2026. Both supply building blocks for the optical and scale-up interconnect roadmap the demonstration showcases.</p>
<h3>Does a demonstration mean the product is ready to buy?</h3>
<p>No. A demonstration shows the technology works under controlled conditions. Volume production depends on yields, thermal and reliability qualification, and a customer committing to a platform — none of which Marvell has disclosed for this silicon.</p>
<h3>What should infrastructure buyers evaluate before designing in co-packaged optics?</h3>
<p>Energy per bit against the pluggable modules it replaces, thermal behaviour at rack density, laser reliability, and what happens when an optical engine soldered to a switch substrate fails. Serviceability economics differ sharply from swappable modules.</p>
<h3>When will more details emerge?</h3>
<p>Marvell has scheduled an Investor Day for October 6, 2026 in New York, where management has said it will detail the long-term custom silicon trajectory, scale-up optics and the fiscal 2029 revenue envelope.</p>
</section>
</aside>
</div>
<p><script type="application/ld+json">{"@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [{"@type": "NewsArticle", "headline": "Marvell's 102.4Tbps 2nm Optics Make AI Scale-Out a Watts-Per-Bit Problem", "description": "Marvell demonstrated 2nm optical interconnects for AI data centers, including 102.4Tbps co-packaged optics at 200G and 400G per lane. The company calls it an industry first. The demo matters less for raw speed than for energy per bit \u2014 the constraint now shaping how hyperscalers scale out AI racks past 800G.", "image": ["/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/marvell-2nm-co-packaged-optics-102-4tbps.webp"], "author": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "jain.com Editorial"}, "datePublished": "2026-09-22T11:18:32.866469+00:00"}, {"@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [{"@type": "Question", "name": "What exactly did Marvell announce?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Marvell demonstrated optical interconnect silicon built on a 2nm manufacturing process for AI data centers, including a co-packaged optics engine running at 102.4 terabits per second and supporting 200G and 400G per electrical lane. The company describes it as an industry first."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What is co-packaged optics?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Co-packaged optics, or CPO, places the component that converts electrical signals into light onto the same substrate as the switch or accelerator chip, instead of in a module plugged into the front of the box. The shorter electrical path uses less energy per bit of data moved."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Why is 102.4 terabits per second significant?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "It is roughly 12.8 terabytes of data every second through a single switch package. At that scale, the practical constraint is no longer whether the link is fast enough but how many watts the link consumes inside a rack's fixed power budget."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Why is this a power story rather than a bandwidth story?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "A data hall commits a fixed number of megawatts, and a rack a fixed number of kilowatts. Every watt the network consumes is a watt unavailable to the accelerators it connects, so reducing energy per bit directly increases how much compute fits in the same building."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What does 2nm mean in this context?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "It refers to the semiconductor manufacturing process node used to build the chip. Smaller nodes generally pack more transistors into the same area and do the same work with less power, which is the property that matters most for interconnect silicon."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What are 200G and 400G per lane?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "A lane is a single electrical signalling path. Today's mainstream optics run 800G links; the generation now ramping is 1.6T. Doubling per-lane rates to 200G and 400G is what enables the coming 3.2T generation Marvell is aiming at."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Why not just use copper cables?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Copper works well over short distances, but as per-lane signalling rates rise, the distance copper can carry a clean signal falls. Marvell notes copper runs out of reach at the speeds required to link tens of thousands of accelerators across multiple racks."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "How large is Marvell's data center business?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Data center revenue was $2.17 billion in the most recent reported quarter, up 46% year over year and equal to 79% of total revenue of $2.739 billion. That concentration makes the AI buildout cycle effectively the company's business model."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What did Marvell guide for the current quarter?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Revenue of $3.150 billion plus or minus 5%, with non-GAAP earnings of $1.10 per share plus or minus $0.05. The August 27 filing also raised the fiscal 2027 and fiscal 2028 outlooks."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What is the Google warrant?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "As part of an expanded partnership, Google received a warrant to acquire up to 7% of Marvell's shares, tied to revenue milestones. It aligns a large customer with Marvell's growth, but represents potential dilution for existing shareholders on terms not publicly detailed."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "How does this affect Broadcom?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Broadcom is the incumbent in high-speed networking silicon. Being first to demonstrate 2nm optics is a claim on the next design cycle rather than on current sockets, since hyperscalers qualify interconnect years ahead of deployment."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What did the Celestial AI and XConn acquisitions add?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Celestial AI brought photonic fabric technology and closed February 2, 2026; XConn Technologies brought chiplet connectivity and closed February 10, 2026. Both supply building blocks for the optical and scale-up interconnect roadmap the demonstration showcases."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "Does a demonstration mean the product is ready to buy?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "No. A demonstration shows the technology works under controlled conditions. Volume production depends on yields, thermal and reliability qualification, and a customer committing to a platform \u2014 none of which Marvell has disclosed for this silicon."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "What should infrastructure buyers evaluate before designing in co-packaged optics?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Energy per bit against the pluggable modules it replaces, thermal behaviour at rack density, laser reliability, and what happens when an optical engine soldered to a switch substrate fails. Serviceability economics differ sharply from swappable modules."}}, {"@type": "Question", "name": "When will more details emerge?", "acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer", "text": "Marvell has scheduled an Investor Day for October 6, 2026 in New York, where management has said it will detail the long-term custom silicon trajectory, scale-up optics and the fiscal 2029 revenue envelope."}}]}]}</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
