Case 2:17-cv-08140-FMO-PLA Document 30 Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:204 1 Stephen M. Doniger (SBN 179314) stephen@donigerlawfirm.com 2 Scott Alan Burroughs (SBN 235718) 3 scott@donigerlawfirm.com Howard S. Han (SBN 243406) 4 hhan@donigerlawfirm.com 5 DONIGER / BURROUGHS 603 Rose Avenue 6 Venice, California 90291 7 Telephone: (310) 590-1820 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT Case No. 2:17-cv-08140-FMO-PLA 12 GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Hon. Fernando M. Olguin Presiding 13 Plaintiff, RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW 14 CAUSE v. 15 16 HAPPY MUTANTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1 17 through 10, 18 Defendants. 19 20 On February 14, 2018 this Court issued an Order granting Defendant’s motion 21 to dismiss with leave to amend. That Order appeared to give Plaintiff the option of 22 either filing a Second Amended Complaint by February 26, 2018 or having the case 23 dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff thus believed that this case would simply be 24 dismissed without prejudice should it not file a Second Amended Complaint and is 25 unclear as to why this Order to Show Cause threatening sanctions has issued. 26 Given this Court’s statement in its February 14, 2018 Order that it was 27 “skeptical that plaintiff has sufficiently alleged facts to support either its inducement 28 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 1 Case 2:17-cv-08140-FMO-PLA Document 30 Filed 03/12/18 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:205 1 or material contribution theories of copyright infringement” (docket No. 26, page 2, 2 lines 7-8), which referenced the 2014 Tarantino v. Gawker Media, LLC case (which 3 in turn held that a plaintiff asserting contributory infringement claims based on 4 linking to third party content had to plead specific facts that the linking led to further 5 acts of infringement), 1 Plaintiff has elected to pursue third party subpoenas under, 6 inter alia, The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Section 512(h) in order to obtain 7 further facts before determining how to proceed on its claims against Happy Mutants. 8 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff submits that there is no basis for sanctions; 9 however, the case can and should be dismissed without prejudice at this juncture per 10 this Court’s February 14, 2018 Order. 11 Respectfully submitted, 12 Dated: March 12, 2018 By: /s/ Stephen M. Doniger 13 Stephen M. Doniger, Esq. Howard S. Han, Esq. 14 DONIGER /BURROUGHS 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 As discussed in Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, it appears 23 to Plaintiff that Judge Walter’s decision in Tarantino v. Gawker Media, LLC finding 24 that evidence of further infringements is required is inconsistent with the plain language of the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et 25 al., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007) that “Google could be held contributorily liable if 26 it had knowledge that infringing Perfect 10 images were available using its search engine, could take simple measures to prevent further damage to Perfect 10’s 27 copyrighted works, and failed to take such steps.” 508 F.3d at 1172. 28 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2