Case 23-14853-TBA      Doc 1120    Filed 10/15/26 Entered 10/16/26 09:17:57              Desc Main
                                  Document     Page 1 of 3


  UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
  DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

   Caption in Compliance with D.N.J. LBR
   9004-1(b)

  James S. Carr, Esq.                                          Order Filed on October 15, 2026
  Dana P. Kane, Esq.                                           by Clerk,
  KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP                                     U.S. Bankruptcy Court
  7 Giralda Farms, Suite 340                                   District of New Jersey
  Madison, NJ 07940
  Telephone: (973) 503-5900
  Facsimile: (973) 503-5950
  jcarr@kelleydrye.com
  dkane@kelleydrye.com

  and

  Robert J. Feinstein, Esq.
  Bradford J. Sandler, Esq.
  Jason S. Pomerantz, Esq.
  PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
  1700 Broadway, 36th Floor
  New York, NY 10019
  Telephone: (212) 561-7700
  Facsimile: (212) 561-7777
  rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com
  bsandler@pszjlaw.com
  jspomerantz@pszjlaw.com


  Counsel for GUC Trustee

   In re:                                            Chapter 11

   CTI Liquidation Co., Inc.                         Case No. 23-14853 (TBA)

                       Post-Effective Date Debtor.   (Jointly Administered)

                   ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD WITHIN WHICH
                    THE GUC TRUSTEE MAY OBJECT TO CLAIMS
               The relief set forth below and on the following pages, numbered two (2) through

 and including three (3), is hereby ORDERED.


DATED: October 15, 2026


Case 23-14853-TBA              Doc 1120      Filed 10/15/26 Entered 10/16/26 09:17:57                        Desc Main
                                            Document     Page 2 of 3
 Page:            2
 Debtors:         CTI Liquidation, Inc., et al.
 Case No.:        23-14853 (TBA)
 Caption:         Order Extending the Period Within Which the GUC Trustee May Object to Claims

            Upon consideration of the GUC Trustee’s Fifth Motion for Entry of an Order Extending

 the Period Within Which the GUC Trustee May Object to Claims (the “Motion”)1 filed by

 META Advisors LLC, in its capacity as GUC Trustee (the “GUC Trustee”) of the Cyxtera GUC

 Trust established in the chapter 11 cases of the above-captioned debtors (collectively, the

 “Debtors”), and it appearing that the relief requested in the Motion is in the best interests of the

 Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and all other parties in interest; and the Court having jurisdiction

 to consider the Motion and the relief requested therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334;

 and consideration of the Motion being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and

 venue being proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and it appearing that

 no other or further notice need be provided; and no objections to the Motion having been filed;

 and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

            1.       The Motion is GRANTED as set forth herein.

            2.       The time period within which the GUC Trustee may file objections to General

 Unsecured Claims is enlarged and extended through and including the later of: (a) April 30,

 2027, or (b) one hundred eighty (180) days following the date that a proof of Claim asserting a

 General Unsecured Claim is filed or amended (the “Claims Objection Deadline”).

            3.       This Order shall be without prejudice to the rights of the GUC Trustee to seek

 further extensions of the Claims Objection Deadline.


 1
     Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.


Case 23-14853-TBA       Doc 1120     Filed 10/15/26 Entered 10/16/26 09:17:57             Desc Main
                                    Document     Page 3 of 3
 Page:       3
 Debtors:    CTI Liquidation, Inc., et al.
 Case No.:   23-14853 (TBA)
 Caption:    Order Extending the Period Within Which the GUC Trustee May Object to Claims

        4.      This Court shall retain exclusive jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the

 provisions of this Order in all respects and further to hear and determine all matters arising from

 the construction and implementation of this Order.