{"cached_at":"2026-11-12T11:44:14.038799+00:00","cl_docket_id":"14767335","docket":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","id":14767335,"court":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/nvd/","court_id":"nvd","original_court_info":null,"idb_data":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/fjc-integrated-database/25558445/","date_created":"2020-08-27T01:44:55.772406-07:00","date_modified":"2022-01-28T13:57:00.457597-08:00","dataset_source":9,"office":"2","docket_number":"1802097","origin":1,"date_filed":"2018-10-31","jurisdiction":3,"nature_of_suit":820,"title":"17","section":"0101","subsection":"","diversity_of_residence":null,"class_action":null,"monetary_demand":0,"county_of_residence":32003,"arbitration_at_filing":"","arbitration_at_termination":"","multidistrict_litigation_docket_number":"","plaintiff":"MILLER, ET AL","defendant":"4INTERNET, LLC., ET AL","date_transfer":null,"transfer_office":"","transfer_docket_number":"","transfer_origin":"","date_terminated":null,"termination_class_action_status":null,"procedural_progress":null,"disposition":null,"nature_of_judgement":null,"amount_received":null,"judgment":null,"pro_se":0,"year_of_tape":2099,"nature_of_offense":"","version":null,"circuit":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/ca9/","district":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/nvd/"},"clusters":["https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/9823769/","https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/9826400/","https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/9820989/","https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/9829739/","https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/clusters/9831299/"],"audio_files":[],"assigned_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/901/","referred_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/9409/","bankruptcy_information":null,"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2019-03-21T10:21:23.466196-07:00","date_modified":"2026-07-03T19:44:25.837744-07:00","source":9,"appeal_from_str":"","assigned_to_str":"Jennifer A. Dorsey","referred_to_str":"Cam Ferenbach","panel_str":"","date_last_index":"2023-08-29T11:19:02.099159-07:00","date_cert_granted":null,"date_cert_denied":null,"date_argued":null,"date_reargued":null,"date_reargument_denied":null,"date_filed":"2018-10-31","date_terminated":"2022-07-05","date_last_filing":"2026-05-28","case_name_short":"","case_name":"Miller v. 4Internet, LLC.","case_name_full":"","slug":"miller-v-4internet-llc","docket_number":"2:18-cv-02097","docket_number_core":"1802097","docket_number_raw":"2:18-cv-02097","docket_number_source":0,"federal_dn_office_code":"2","federal_dn_case_type":"cv","federal_dn_judge_initials_assigned":"JAD","federal_dn_judge_initials_referred":"VCF","federal_defendant_number":null,"pacer_case_id":"133768","cause":"17:101 Copyright Infringement","nature_of_suit":"820 Copyright","jury_demand":"Plaintiff","jurisdiction_type":"Federal Question","appellate_fee_status":"","appellate_case_type_information":"","mdl_status":"","filepath_ia":"","filepath_ia_json":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"ia_needs_upload":true,"ia_date_first_change":"2019-03-21T10:21:23.459294-07:00","date_blocked":null,"blocked":false,"appeal_from":null,"parent_docket":null,"tags":[],"panel":[]},"parties":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/11405955/","id":11405955,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6582869/","attorney_id":6582869,"date_action":"2023-07-12","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6582869/","attorney_id":6582869,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Interested Party","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2022-02-23T13:19:56.736773-08:00","date_modified":"2022-02-23T13:19:56.736802-08:00","name":"United States of America","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/10029302/","id":10029302,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6582869/","attorney_id":6582869,"date_action":"2023-07-12","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6582869/","attorney_id":6582869,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6582869/","attorney_id":6582869,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":2}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Interested Party","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2020-10-07T09:58:34.604991-07:00","date_modified":"2020-10-07T09:58:34.605028-07:00","name":"AMERICA UNITED STATES OF","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/4923534/","id":4923534,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":"2023-07-11","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Movant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]},{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Counter Defendant","date_terminated":"2020-07-10","extra_info":"TERMINATED: 07/10/2020","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.965544-07:00","date_modified":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.965579-07:00","name":"Christopher Sadowski","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/4923533/","id":4923533,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6963320/","attorney_id":6963320,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6963320/","attorney_id":6963320,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6963320/","attorney_id":6963320,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6963320/","attorney_id":6963320,"date_action":"2023-07-11","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":"2023-07-11","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Counter Defendant","date_terminated":"2020-07-10","extra_info":"TERMINATED: 07/10/2020","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.955531-07:00","date_modified":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.955585-07:00","name":"The Law Firm of Higbee & Associates, APC","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/4923532/","id":4923532,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":"2023-07-11","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Counter Defendant","date_terminated":"2020-07-10","extra_info":"TERMINATED: 07/10/2020","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.945630-07:00","date_modified":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.945671-07:00","name":"Mathew Higbee","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/4923531/","id":4923531,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608106/","attorney_id":3608106,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608106/","attorney_id":3608106,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/7483343/","attorney_id":7483343,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]},{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Counter Claimant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.823522-07:00","date_modified":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.823572-07:00","name":"4Internet, LLC.","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/4923530/","id":4923530,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8645957/","attorney_id":8645957,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":10},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6963320/","attorney_id":6963320,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6963320/","attorney_id":6963320,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6963320/","attorney_id":6963320,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/6963320/","attorney_id":6963320,"date_action":"2023-07-11","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":6},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/3608105/","attorney_id":3608105,"date_action":"2023-07-11","docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"role":6}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]},{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","docket_id":14767335,"name":"Counter Defendant","date_terminated":"2020-07-10","extra_info":"TERMINATED: 07/10/2020","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.788332-07:00","date_modified":"2019-04-25T13:07:38.788369-07:00","name":"Robert Miller","extra_info":""}],"entries":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/465537662/","id":465537662,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/480744358/","id":480744358,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/166/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2026-05-28T14:26:45.517084-07:00","date_modified":"2026-05-28T14:26:45.524829-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"166","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115011506884","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion for Release of Bond Obligation","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-05-28T14:26:45.489567-07:00","date_modified":"2026-05-28T14:26:45.497231-07:00","date_filed":"2026-05-28","time_filed":"14:05:29","entry_number":166,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-05-28.001","pacer_sequence_number":573,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/463603461/","id":463603461,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/478754630/","id":478754630,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/165/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2026-05-11T08:19:50.189228-07:00","date_modified":"2026-05-11T08:19:50.210401-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"165","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115011477123","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Motion Release of Bond Obligation","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-05-11T08:19:50.107637-07:00","date_modified":"2026-05-11T08:19:50.135351-07:00","date_filed":"2026-05-11","time_filed":"07:51:35","entry_number":165,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-05-11.001","pacer_sequence_number":567,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/457143128/","id":457143128,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/472120955/","id":472120955,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-03-13T14:24:51.248076-07:00","date_modified":"2026-03-13T14:24:51.261490-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Minute Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-03-13T14:24:51.229598-07:00","date_modified":"2026-03-13T14:24:51.229614-07:00","date_filed":"2026-03-13","time_filed":"14:16:51","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-03-13.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/453412126/","id":453412126,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/468303818/","id":468303818,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/163/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2026-02-10T13:22:25.473552-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-04T04:57:36.662045-07:00","sha1":"5f51244e3672053e460d4cc4fe3c2689bba0342d","page_count":1,"file_size":208157,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.163.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.163.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"          Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF          Document 163        Filed 02/06/26     Page 1 of 1\n\n\n\n\n 1                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                                      DISTRICT OF NEVADA\n 2\n     ROBERT MILLER,\n 3\n             PLAINTIFF,                                  Case No. 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF\n 4\n     V.\n 5\n 6   4INTERNET, LLC AND\n     JOHN DOES 1-10\n 7\n           DEFENDANTS.\n 8   ______________________________________\n 9\n                       ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISBURSE FUNDS\n10\n          Having read and considered Defendant 4Internet, LLC\u2019s unopposed Motion to Disburse the\n11\n12   appellate bond [ECF No. 161], the Court finds that Defendant 4Internet, LLC has a lien on all\n\n13   non-exempt personal property of Plaintiff Robert Miller, including the $7,500 deposited with\n14   the Court on January 21, 2023. The lack of response also constitutes consent to granting this\n15\n     motion under Local Rule 7-2(d). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion [161] is\n16\n     GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to disburse the funds to:\n17\n18    4Internet, LLC\n      c/o Ryan L. Isenberg\n19    Isenberg & Hewitt, P.C.\n20    1200 Altmore Ave., Ste 120\n      Sandy Springs, GA 30342\n21\n22\n                                          __________________________\n23                                        U.S. District Judge\n                                          February 6, 2026\n24\n25\n26\n27\n28\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2026-07-03T19:44:25.733029-07:00","document_number":"163","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115011321144","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order Distribution of Funds AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-02-10T13:22:25.451857-08:00","date_modified":"2026-07-03T19:43:21.051121-07:00","date_filed":"2026-02-06","time_filed":"12:31:24","entry_number":163,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-02-10.001","pacer_sequence_number":562,"description":" ORDER Granting  161   Motion to Disburse Funds.    Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/6/2026.     (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF. CC to Finance. - AF)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/451030824/","id":451030824,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/465864741/","id":465864741,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2026-01-21T12:20:43.104377-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-21T12:20:43.111817-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Notice Attorney Action Required","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-01-21T12:20:43.089304-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-21T12:20:43.089317-08:00","date_filed":"2026-01-21","time_filed":"11:25:15","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-01-21.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/451015977/","id":451015977,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/465849522/","id":465849522,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/160/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2026-01-21T11:24:13.425521-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-21T11:24:13.433348-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"160","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115011288357","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Notice Other","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-01-21T11:24:13.389318-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-21T11:24:13.397028-08:00","date_filed":"2026-01-21","time_filed":"10:47:38","entry_number":160,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-01-21.001","pacer_sequence_number":551,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/451015973/","id":451015973,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/465849518/","id":465849518,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/161/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2026-01-21T11:24:13.140036-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-21T11:24:13.146607-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"161","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115011288363","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Motion Miscellaneous Relief","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-01-21T11:24:13.111797-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-21T11:24:13.119400-08:00","date_filed":"2026-01-21","time_filed":"10:49:36","entry_number":161,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-01-21.001","pacer_sequence_number":553,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/450802667/","id":450802667,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/465630016/","id":465630016,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/158/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2026-01-20T07:18:54.913818-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-20T07:18:54.921311-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"158","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115011284285","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Motion Writ","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-01-20T07:18:54.888656-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-20T07:18:54.894703-08:00","date_filed":"2026-01-20","time_filed":"06:17:20","entry_number":158,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-01-20.001","pacer_sequence_number":546,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/450802634/","id":450802634,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/465629981/","id":465629981,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/159/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2026-01-20T07:18:54.297753-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-20T07:18:54.306563-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"159","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115011284304","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Writ Issued AND XX - Order on Motion for Writ TURNED OFF","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2026-01-20T07:18:54.270372-08:00","date_modified":"2026-01-20T07:18:54.276560-08:00","date_filed":"2026-01-20","time_filed":"07:09:22","entry_number":159,"recap_sequence_number":"2026-01-20.001","pacer_sequence_number":548,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/397159146/","id":397159146,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/406325674/","id":406325674,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/157/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2024-07-22T13:17:50.157584-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.834302-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"157","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115010543554","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"USCA Mandate","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-07-22T13:17:50.145988-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.809272-07:00","date_filed":"2024-07-22","time_filed":"12:24:40","entry_number":157,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-07-22.001","pacer_sequence_number":542,"description":"MANDATE of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to 156 USCA Memorandum Affirming Judgment of the US District Court re 129 Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff. The judgment of this Court, entered June 28, 2024, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) Modified on 7/22/2024 22-16195 (WJ). (Entered: 07/22/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/395213567/","id":395213567,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/404324379/","id":404324379,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/156/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2024-07-01T10:02:48.917637-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.778871-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"156","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115010516467","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"USCA Memorandum/Opinion","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-07-01T10:02:48.863599-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.752883-07:00","date_filed":"2024-06-28","time_filed":null,"entry_number":156,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-06-28.001","pacer_sequence_number":538,"description":"MEMORANDUM of USCA, Ninth Circuit, AFFIRMING as to 142 Notice of Appeal, filed by The Law Firm of Higbee & Associates, APC, Mathew Higbee, USCA Case Number 23-15102, and 129 Notice of Appeal filed by Robert Miller, USCA Case Number 22-16195 (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) (Entered: 07/01/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/363307149/","id":363307149,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/370068112/","id":370068112,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2023-08-29T11:18:58.677505-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.734556-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-08-29T11:18:58.669482-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.716275-07:00","date_filed":"2023-07-12","time_filed":null,"entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-07-12.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"Attorney update in case: Attorney Skyler Pearson withdrawn from the case. (Welsh, Blaine)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/363307148/","id":363307148,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/370068111/","id":370068111,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/154/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2023-08-29T11:18:58.630368-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.652797-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"154","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115010002512","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-08-29T11:18:58.617239-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.630318-07:00","date_filed":"2023-06-14","time_filed":null,"entry_number":154,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-06-14.001","pacer_sequence_number":530,"description":"MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Mathew K. Higbee for Plaintiff Robert Miller. Responses due by 6/28/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Mathew K. Higbee)(Higbee, Mathew) (Entered: 06/14/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/358579389/","id":358579389,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/365152333/","id":365152333,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2023-07-12T11:45:28.880402-07:00","date_modified":"2023-07-12T11:45:28.881729-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Withdraw Counsel","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-07-12T11:45:28.877646-07:00","date_modified":"2023-07-12T11:45:28.877658-07:00","date_filed":"2023-07-12","time_filed":"10:56:53","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-07-12.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/358471005/","id":358471005,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/365032044/","id":365032044,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/155/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2023-07-11T12:27:35.545594-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.698356-07:00","sha1":"667ca3668f3d4f922121c84a30f61dc7bb280aad","page_count":2,"file_size":105221,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.155.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.155.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"           Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 155 Filed 07/11/23 Page 1 of 2\n\n\n\n\n1                                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n\n2                                            DISTRICT OF NEVADA\n\n3                                                        ***\n      Robert Miller,\n4\n                            Plaintiff(s),\n5                                                             2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF\n      v.                                                      ORDER\n6     4Internet, LLC,\n7                           Defendant(s).\n8\n\n9           Before the court is the letter written by Robert Miller requesting reconsideration of Order (ECF\n10   NO.140). (ECF NO. 152). The letter was dated May 7, 2023, and filed on June 1, 2023.\n11          Under LR IA 11-6(a), unless the court orders otherwise, a party who has appeared by attorney\n12   cannot while so represented appear or act in the case. This means that once an attorney makes an\n13   appearance on behalf of a party, that party may not personally file a document with the court; all filings\n14   must thereafter be made by the attorney. An attorney who has appeared for a party must be recognized by\n15   the court and all the parties as having control of the client\u2019s case, however, the court may hear a party\n16   in open court even though the party is represented by an attorney.\n17          Here, at the time of filing of his letter on June 1, 2023, Miller was represented by retained counsel,\n18   Ryan E. Carreon and Matthew K. Higbee of the law firm of Higbee & Associates. (See Complaint, ECF\n19   NO. 1).\n20          On June 14, 2023, counsel Ryan E. Carreon and Matthew K. Higbee of the law firm of Higbee &\n21   Associates has filed a motion to withdraw as attorney of record. (ECF No. 154).\n22          No opposition has been filed to ECF No. 154, and the time to file an opposition has passed.\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n                                                          1\n\f           Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 155 Filed 07/11/23 Page 2 of 2\n\n\n\n\n1           Under LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any\n\n2    motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney\u2019s fees, constitutes a consent to\n\n3    the granting of the motion.\n\n4           Accordingly,\n\n5           IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the letter written by Robert Miller requesting reconsideration of\n\n6    Order (ECF NO. 152), is STRICKEN.\n\n7           The Clerk of Court is directed to strike the letter written by Robert Miller requesting\n\n8    reconsideration of Order (ECF NO. 152) from the docket.\n\n9           IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to withdraw as counsel of record (ECF No. 154), is\n\n10   GRANTED.\n\n11\n\n12          DATED this 11th day of July 2023.\n                                                                 _________________________\n13                                                               CAM FERENBACH\n                                                                 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n                                                         2\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2023-07-12T01:20:41.666057-07:00","document_number":"155","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"115010038699","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":true,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order AND Order on Motion to Reconsider AND Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-07-11T12:27:35.536474-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.671482-07:00","date_filed":"2023-07-11","time_filed":"12:13:13","entry_number":155,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-07-11.001","pacer_sequence_number":532,"description":"ORDER striking 152 Motion for Reconsideration and ORDER granting 154 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney by Mathew K. Higbee. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the letter written by Robert Miller requesting reconsideration of Order 152, is STRICKEN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to withdraw as counsel of record 154, is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/11/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) (Entered: 07/11/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/346528377/","id":346528377,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/352911238/","id":352911238,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/153/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2023-06-14T10:13:14.055401-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.610375-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"153","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"11509990828","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-06-14T10:13:14.042697-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.592215-07:00","date_filed":"2023-06-06","time_filed":null,"entry_number":153,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-06-06.001","pacer_sequence_number":527,"description":"RESPONSE to 152 Motion for Reconsideration by Defendant 4Internet, LLC.. Replies due by 6/13/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A ( Grecco Malpractice Complaint), # 2 Exhibit B (Offer to Settle))(Isenberg, Ryan) (Entered: 06/06/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/345715933/","id":345715933,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/352056378/","id":352056378,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/152/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2023-06-05T15:03:00.685403-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.569136-07:00","sha1":"bda41db207ead13d602948cd9485bba5eae4de8b","page_count":4,"file_size":381572,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.152.0_1.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.152.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":"recap-thumbnails/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/352056378.thumb.1068.png","thumbnail_status":1,"plain_text":"Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 152 Filed 06/01/23 Page 1of 4\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRobert Miller\nApartment Sk Street FILED RECEIVED\n\nENTERED SERVED ON\nNew York, NY 10026 \u2014 \u2014\nRobertmillerphotographer@gmail.com COUNSELIPARTIES OF RECORD\n\n- | 2023\nMay 7,2023 JUN\nCLERK US DiS: RiCT COURT\n\nUnited States District Court DISTRICT OF NEVADA\nDistrict of Nevada BY: DEPUTY\nHon. Jennifer A. Dorsey a\n333 Las Vegas Blvd South\n\nLas Vegas, NV 89101\n\nRE: Robert Miller v. 4internet, LLC .\nCase No. 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF\n\nYour Honor:\n\nlam writing pursuant to FRCP 60(b)(6) requesting that you reconsider the financial judgment\nimposed on me pursuant to the granting of the Defendant\u2019s motion for fees and costs and\ndenying counter-defendant\u2019s motion for sanctions [Dkt. No. 140]. More specifically, in the\ninterests of justice, | am requesting that the Court relieve me of financial responsibility for the\nresulting judgment and, for the reasons set forth below, impose that judgment on my attorney\nMatthew Higbee of Higbee and Associates. | am also requesting that Your Honor temporarily\nstay the enforcement of the resulting judgment during the pendency of your consideration of\nthis application since there are a number of issues related to my attorney's representation of\nme in the judgment collection process that are also going on in New York.\n\nAt its heart, the reason | am making this application is that | was never properly informed about\nall of the associated risks that this case included by Mr. Higbee or his staff. For example, | was\nnever told by Mr. Highee that this case was contrary to the existing law for the Sth Circuit and\nthat in bringing this lawsuit | would be exposing myself to the potential for reverse legal fees\nthat | could not afford. | would never have allowed this case to be filed or continued to pursue\nthis matter if ] would have been given the correct information from my attorney. There Is\nsimply no rationale reason why, had | been properly informed, | would have authorized a case\nwhere my potential recovery was a tiny fraction of the potential risk of $99,604.42 in awarded\nattorney fees. | do not personally have any interest in challenging existing law or changing the\nlaw in the 9th Circuit. This case was at all times driven by Mr. Higbee who never explained to\nme any of the details or risks. Because this was my lawyer\u2019s case and not mine, | believe that |\nshould not be held personally responsible, but it should be an obligation of my lawyer. This is\nthe course he steered and not one he informed me of.\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\fCase 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 152 Filed 06/01/23 Page 2 of 4\n\n1 do not have this kind of money to risk and, if | would have been properly informed, this never\nwould have happened. This case would not have been filed. This case would not have been\npursued and litigated. And this case would not have resulted in such a large judgment | cannot\nafford.\n\ni have been asking questions and I have been getting answers but every time | do some\nhomework ta learn some more | find the answers | was given are simply not true. For example,\n\n| was told this was a clear case of an infringement which | understood to be a display of my\nphoto on a website that is an online publication news site with advertisements around it on the\nsame page. | have asked for a copy of this but have never been given it despite repeated\nrequests. Now, after the case Is over, | find out this case is based upon a link of my picture from\nthe NY Post and not the clear infringement | was led to believe had occurred.\n\nI never would have pursued this case in a district court that was subject to existing precedent\nthat dictated I would lose the case in the district court. | have zero interest in being involved in\na litigation seeking to change existing law since | cannot afford the stakes involved in that type\nof action and, personally, | do not have anywhere near enough of an interest in the outcome\nthat | would want to be a plaintiff under those circumstances. | do not understand how Mr.\nHigbee was not aware of this law before filing the case in this district court and, if he was, at no\ntime did he tell me of the risks of bringing this claim. Had he done so, which my understanding\nis required of an attorney, this case would not have been started and certainly would not have\nbeen litigated in the manner in which it was.\n\nAdditionally, | first learned that this case was being pursued as a result of being informed that i\nwas being sued personally by the opposing party before the case started. | did learn eventually\nthat this personal lawsuit against me was dismissed. However, I learned that a second attempt\nto personally sue me was pursued and also dismissed when | was told to attend a deposition for\nthis lawsuit. At that time, | learned that this case had been filed and continued to be\n\npursued. At that time, | said to Mr. Higbee that after an attempt to sue me personally twice |\nshould have been told the lawsuit was still being pursued and was advised by Mr. Higbee that\nthis case was important for the law firm to pursue and it was a solid case.\n\nSince the judgment was entered against me, | have attempted to discover more of the details\ninvolved with this matter and to work with Mr. Higbee to resolve the outstanding judgment\nagainst me. Mr. Higbee told me that | have a very good chance of winning the appeal he\n\nfiled. However, when | discussed this with other attorneys, | have been told that my appeal is\npoorly preserved since Mr. Higbee did not create a good record for appeal. | was also told that\neven if he had done the appropriate job in trying to change existing law, that the odds of that\nhappening are very small making the risk and cost of trying to do so very high. Mr. Higbee had\nno basis for believing that | would want to be involved in anything that risky or difficult and\nnever informed me of these risks; even after putting me in this situation. | feel that he has\nrepresented his own issues and not mine in this matter since had he put my interests first none\nof this would have ever happened.\n\n \n\fCase 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 152 Filed 06/01/23 Page 3 of 4\n\nMr. Higbee has agreed at various times to accept some responsibility for the judgment against\nme and at other times has encouraged me to sue him for malpractice. While { have been told |\nhave a very good malpractice claim, | will need to pay new counsel to bring that claim and\ntherefore | will still lose money | do not have attempting to go that route. The only route that\nwill not leave me personally harmed by the actions of my attorney are for this Court to use its\npower to recognize that this case was improperly brought by my attorney without having\ninformed me of the risks and then was litigated by that same attorney without any\nconsideration of the harm he was doing to me personally. Under those circumstances, he\nshould be the one hurt by his actions not me.\n\nYour Honor, as a result of decisions made by an attorney who was supposed to be representing\nmy interests and not his own, | now risk losing my apartment which was obtained through an\naffordable housing program sponsored in NYC for people based upon their income. This is an\noverbearing financial burden on myself as | near retirement age and after having open heart\nSurgery two years ago. | work very hard and am a dedicated photojournalist. | earn everything\nfor myself without having to ask anyone for help.\n\nAt this time however, | am asking you for your consideration in resolving this matter for me\nsince | cannot sustain the financial loss associated with this matter. There is so much more than\n| have put in this letter, if you believe it would be helpful, | would welcome the opportunity to\naddress these matters with the court directly.\n\nThank you for your consideration of this request.\n\nRes il Wr,\nRobert Miller\ncc:\n\nMathew K. Higbee\nRyan L. Isenberg\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\fN\n\u2014\na\noO\n\u2014\noO\noO\nDS\n&\n=\nnN\nLO\na\n_\u2014\nCc\no\nE\naD\noO\nOo\na\nLL\nO\n>\n\nzoz of AVN = zeeERvOgNOO\nHZ 20\n\n9\u00b0000 $ 6L468 diz\n\n\u2014\n\nJAD\no.2\nos\n\na\n=__eey\n\nsamod sand FOVLSOd sn\n\nmo gi dS Y.\n\nVt EN ae\n\n:18-cv-02097\n\n1)\n\nafessgtye deta tt Hat ataded state aden (EE La UE!\n\nLOL68 AN \u2018Seba se]\n\n_yynog PAIgG sefo, se] Cee\n\u201c Kasiog Jayluuer 3jqesouoH\n\nunog yuIsIG SN\n\nc7ez | - NAT\nHS 0)\n\naval\n\n9ZOOT AN ROA MEN\n\n.\u00bb day \u201cLARS HISTL'M LOE\n0\" Saya Ay LUAU\n\nhOU\n\n \n\f","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2023-06-05T16:00:56.867289-07:00","document_number":"152","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"11509987404","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-06-05T15:03:00.671478-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.550204-07:00","date_filed":"2023-06-01","time_filed":null,"entry_number":152,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-06-01.001","pacer_sequence_number":521,"description":"STRICKEN by ECF No. 155 Order MOTION to Reconsider re 140 Order by Plaintiff Robert Miller. Responses due by 6/15/2023. (JQC) (DJorder) Modified on 7/11/2023 - Regenerated NEF (CJS). (Entered: 06/02/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/339802907/","id":339802907,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/346121198/","id":346121198,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/151/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2023-05-31T15:20:06.940810-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.524768-07:00","sha1":"71897c92aea6880c97ef8c969155358a08858480","page_count":3,"file_size":114042,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.151.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.151.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"             Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 151 Filed 05/31/23 Page 1 of 3\n\n\n\n\n1\n\n2\n                                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n3                                           DISTRICT OF NEVADA\n4                                                        ***\n      ROBERT MILLER,\n5\n                            Plaintiff,\n6\n      vs.                                                       2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF\n7\n      4INTERNET, LLC AND\n8     JOHN DOES 1-10,                                           ORDER\n\n9                           Defendants.                         MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH\n                                                                POST JUDGMENT SUBPOENA TO HIGBEE\n10                                                              & ASSOCIATES (ECF No. 147)\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n             Defendant 4Internet, LLC filed a motion to compel compliance with post judgment subpoena to\n\n15   Higbee & Associates. ECF No. 147. I deny the motion for lack of jurisdiction.\n\n16      I.      Background\n\n17           On December 20, 2022, the Court entered judgment in the amount of $99,604.42 in favor of\n\n18   Defendant 4Internet, LLC. ECF No. 141. Defendant allegedly served, via email, a subpoena on the law\n19\n     firm of Higbee & Associates seeking documents relating to settlements, demands, and funds received\n20\n     related to plaintiff. ECF No. 147. 4Internet contends that Higbee is the agent for service of process for\n21\n     H&A, but that Higbee is not present for service in Las Vegas and H&A fails to maintain a registered\n22\n     office in Nevada. Id. Plaintiff argues that service was not proper\u2014but that even if it were proper\u2014the\n23\n     Court lacks jurisdiction to enforce it. ECF No. 148.\n24\n\n25\n\n                                                            1\n\f           Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 151 Filed 05/31/23 Page 2 of 3\n\n\n\n\n         II.      Analysis\n1\n               Rule 45 requires any motions or applications related to a subpoena be brought in the district\n2\n\n3    where compliance is required.1 see also Adv. Comm. Notes to 2013 Amendment, Rule 45 (\"Under\n\n4    Rules 45(d)(2)(B), 45(d)(3), and 45(e)(2)(B), subpoena-related motions and applications are to be made\n\n5    to the court where compliance is required under Rule 45(c).\"). \"Rule 45 makes clear that the place of\n\n6    compliance is tethered to the location of the subpoenaed person.\". Agincourt Gaming, LLC v. Zynga,\n7    Inc., No. 2:14-cv-0708-RFB-NJK, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114348, at 9 (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2014), citing\n8\n     to Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 45(c)(2)(A) (the place of compliance must be \"within 100 miles of where the\n9\n     person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person\"). \u201cThe place of compliance is a\n10\n     jurisdictional issue.\u201d 4R4 Sons, LLC v. TRU G. Wilhelm, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-01081-GMN-NJK, 2022\n11\n     U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130260, at 12 (D. Nev. July 22, 2022), citing to Agincourt Gaming, LLC v. Zynga,\n12\n     Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114348, 2014 WL 4079555, at 3 (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2014).\n13\n               Attorney Higbee, an officer of the court, declares under penalty of perjury that H&A\u2019s corporate\n14\n     headquarters is located at 1504 Brookhollow Drive, Suite #112, Santa Ana, California. ECF No. 148. He\n15\n\n16   also swears that California is the location that all of H&A\u2019s corporate records are maintained. Id. The\n\n17   subpoena directs H&A to produce certain documents related to Miller and states the place of compliance\n\n18   as 9900 Covington Cross Dr., Suite 210-B, Las Vegas, NV 89144. ECF No. 147-1.\n\n19             Defendant filed its Rule 45 motion in the wrong court: this Court lacks jurisdiction over H&A\u2019s\n20\n     corporate headquarters at 1504 Brookhollow Drive, Suite #112, Santa Ana, California. Defendant\u2019s\n21\n     motion contends that Higbee is the agent for service of process for H&A, but admits that Higbee is not\n22\n\n23\n\n24   1\n       Rule 45(d)(1) (As to avoiding undue burden or expense on the party subject to the subpoena, \"[t]he court for the\n     district where compliance is required must enforce this duty\"); (d)(2)(B)(i) (As to an order compelling production\n25   \"the serving party may move the court for the district where compliance is required\").\n\n                                                             2\n\f           Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 151 Filed 05/31/23 Page 3 of 3\n\n\n\n\n     present for service in Las Vegas and H&A fails to maintain a registered office in Nevada. ECF No. 147.\n1\n     While Higbee\u2019s alleged failure here may have other legal consequences, defendant has not shown that\n2\n\n3    this Court is the proper venue to decide issues related to this subpoena. I find that this Court does not\n\n4    have jurisdiction to decide the merits of any issues related to the subpoena. See, e.g., Taddeo v. Am.\n\n5    Invsco Corp., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17697, at 3 (D. Nev. Feb. 11, 2016) (citations omitted).\n\n6    Compliance is required in California, not Nevada. I deny the motion for lack of jurisdiction.\n7           ACCORDINGLY,\n8\n            I ORDER that the defendant 4Internet, LLC\u2019s motion to compel compliance with post judgment\n9\n     subpoena to Higbee & Associates (ECF No. 147) is DENIED.\n10\n            IT IS SO ORDERED.\n11\n            DATED this 31st day of May 2023.\n12\n                                                                   _________________________\n13                                                                 CAM FERENBACH\n                                                                   UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n25\n\n                                                          3\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2023-06-05T15:02:15.835320-07:00","document_number":"151","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"11509983956","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order on Motion to Compel","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-05-31T15:20:06.928984-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.504013-07:00","date_filed":"2023-05-31","time_filed":"14:56:19","entry_number":151,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-05-31.001","pacer_sequence_number":519,"description":"ORDER Denying 147 Motion to Compel Compliance with Post Judgment Subpoena to Higbee & Associates. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/31/2023.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ABG) (Entered: 05/31/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/306904030/","id":306904030,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/313143248/","id":313143248,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/150/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2023-05-03T12:19:49.257118-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.487302-07:00","sha1":"6acc21e0f11553a894e868c62d0f8b113c49260e","page_count":6,"file_size":139801,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.150.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768/gov.uscourts.nvd.133768.150.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"               Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 150 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 6\n\n\n\n\n 1   Troy L. Isaacson, Esq., NV Bar No. 6690\n     Isaacson Law\n 2   9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 210B\n 3   Las Vegas, NV 89144\n     Telephone: (702) 529-5229\n 4   Facsimile: (702) 529-5228\n     Troy@IsaacsonLawLV.com\n 5\n     Ryan L. Isenberg\n 6   Georgia Bar No. 384899\n     Isenberg & Hewitt, P.C.\n 7   6600 Peachtree Dunwoody Road\n     600 Embassy Row, Suite 150\n 8   Atlanta, Georgia 30328\n     770-351-4400 (Voice)\n 9   770-828-0100 (Fax)\n10   ryan@ihlaw.us\n\n11                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                                        DISTRICT OF NEVADA\n12\n     ROBERT MILLER,                                        CIVIL ACTION FILE\n13\n               PLAINTIFF,                                  NO. 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF\n14\n     V.\n15\n16   4INTERNET, LLC AND\n     JOHN DOES 1-10\n17\n           DEFENDANTS.\n18   ______________________________________\n\n19                     REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL\n\n20\n               COMES NOW, 4Internet, LLC (\u201cDefendant\u201d) and files this its Reply Brief in Support of\n21\n     Defendant\u2019s Motion to Compel (Doc. 147) and show this Court as follows:\n22\n23                                  Argument and Citation to Authority\n\n24        I.      The Subpoena is Enforceable\n\n25        Defendant argues both that service by email is improper and that it is not subject to the\n26\n     jurisdiction of the Court. These arguments are legally intertwined. In Genx Processors\n27\n                                                       1\n28\n\f           Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 150 Filed 04/25/23 Page 2 of 6\n\n\n\n\n 1   Mauritius Ltd. v. Jackson, No. 214CV01938APGPAL, 2018 WL 5777485, at *6 (D. Nev. Nov.\n 2   2, 2018) in analyzing whether to enforce a subpoena in a matter involving the alter ego of a\n 3\n     company registered to do business in Nevada, the district court found that a corporation had\n 4\n     \u201cpurposely availed itself of the privilege of doing business in Nevada by registering with the\n 5\n     Nevada Secretary of State as a foreign corporation.\u201d Genx Processors Mauritius Ltd. v. Jackson,\n 6\n 7   No. 214CV01938APGPAL, 2018 WL 5777485, at *6 (D. Nev. Nov. 2, 2018). In NML Cap. Ltd.\n\n 8   v. Republic of Argentina, No. 2:14-CV-492-RFB-VCF, 2014 WL 3898021, at *10 (D. Nev. Aug.\n 9   11, 2014) this Court, in ultimately compelling production of documents in a post-judgment\n10\n     subpoena dispute, determined that \u201c[g]iven the unique status of the corporate person, a federal\n11\n     court's subpoena power reaches all documents\u2014no matter where they are located\u2014that are\n12\n13   within a resident corporation's custody or control. H&A is not only registered to do business in\n\n14   Nevada, but actively represents to this Court (and the public in its online presence) that it has a\n\n15   law office in Nevada. The notion that H&A cannot be subpoenaed in Nevada under these\n16\n     circumstances is frivolous.\n17\n         More problematic is the reality that H&A doesn\u2019t maintain a registered agent in Nevada, and\n18\n     by all appearances, doesn\u2019t actually have anyone of authority working in its Nevada office. On\n19\n20   March 20, 2023, the image below was taken outside of the location that H&A claims as it\n\n21   physical and registered office. It seems strikingly unadorned for a firm that on its website\n22   claims to have at least 18 offices nationwide. 1\n23\n24\n25\n26\n     1\n      See https://www.google.com/maps/d/embed?mid=1-3KDmbJ-\n27   vNQMtQzPH22fZxG1ENc&ll=37.936538259343735%2C-98.33625394999999&z=5\n                                                        2\n28\n\f           Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 150 Filed 04/25/23 Page 3 of 6\n\n\n\n\n 1\n 2\n 3\n 4\n 5\n 6\n 7\n 8\n 9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14      \u201cRule 45(b) governs the service of subpoenas; however, Rule 45(b) is silent with respect to\n15\n     service on a corporation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b).\u201d See Howlink Glob. LLC v. AT&T, Inc., No.\n16\n     222CV00040JRGRSP, 2022 WL 17069109, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2022); See also Sanchez Y\n17\n     Martin, S.A. de C.V. v. Dos Amigos, Inc., No. 17CV1943 LAB (JMA), 2018 WL 2387580, at *3\n18\n19   (S.D. Cal. May 24, 2018) (Rule 45 does not specify what constitutes personal service on a\n\n20   corporation in the United States or in a foreign country.). Courts are increasingly finding that\n21\n     \u201cdelivery under Rule 45 means a manner of service reasonably designed to ensure actual receipt\n22\n     of a subpoena by a witness, rather than personal service.\u201d Id. quoting Chambers v. Whirlpool\n23\n     Corp., 2016 WL 9451361, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2016) (citations and internal quotations\n24\n25   omitted).\n\n26          In light of a history of personally and directly communicating with Mathew Higbee\n\n27   dating back to September of 2018 (Doc. 121-3 pp. 4) and the fact that Mr. Higbee (who is not\n                                                      3\n28\n\f           Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 150 Filed 04/25/23 Page 4 of 6\n\n\n\n\n 1   only the registered agent, but the sole officer of H&A 2) was not to be found where he represents\n 2   to this Court and the Nevada Secretary of State that he may be found, emailing the subpoena to\n 3\n     him was, as a matter of fact, the only reasonable way to ensure actual receipt. On the off chance\n 4\n     he decided not to check his email, it was also sent to his colleague Ryan Carreon \u2013 as was the\n 5\n     follow-up. The subpoena commands production of documents at Mr. Isaacson\u2019s office which is\n 6\n 7   about ten or so miles away from the H&A North Las Vegas office and about a twenty-minute\n\n 8   drive even at rush hour. Of course, H&A could simply make the documents available\n 9   electronically and provide a link or put them on a flash drive and deliver them via FedEx and\n10\n     send 4Internet the bill.\n11\n        II.     Waiver\n12\n13      \u201cWhere a party has actual notice, failure to make a timely objection waives insufficiency of\n\n14   service.\u201d E. & J. Gallo Winery v. EnCana Energy Serv., Inc., No. CVF03\u20135412AWI LJO, 2005\n\n15   WL 3710352, at *4 (E.D.Cal. Aug.15, 2005); Kwong Mei Lan Mirana v. Battery Tai-Shing\n16\n     Corp., No. C 08-80142MISC.JFRS, 2009 WL 290459, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2009). Here,\n17\n18\n19                  2\n\n\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\n26\n27\n                                                     4\n28\n\f           Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 150 Filed 04/25/23 Page 5 of 6\n\n\n\n\n 1   Higbee had actual notice of the subpoena. Not only did he not respond to the email regarding the\n 2   subpoena, but he didn\u2019t respond to the follow-up email specifically asking what the intention was\n 3\n     with respect to that subpoena (Doc. 147-1 pp.18).\n 4\n        III.    The Court Should Enforce the Subpoena\n 5\n        Defendant has not sought sanctions, and clearly H&A has actual knowledge of the subpoena.\n 6\n 7   In In re Subpoena to VaughnPerling, No. 219MC00083CASEX, 2019 WL 8012372, at *5 (C.D.\n\n 8   Cal. Dec. 2, 2019) the district court, after considering authority and policy considerations\n 9   decided that it would elevate form over substance to require any further efforts at service and\n10\n     granted a motion to enforce subpoenas. Among the authority the VaughnPerling Court relied\n11\n     upon was Chambers, supra, which in part involved attorneys who were, to the frustration of that\n12\n13   court, unwilling to accept service of the subpoena. It may be true that in a number of instances\n\n14   where alternative service is allowed that prior attempts at traditional methods of service have\n\n15   first been tried, but there is no provision in Rule 45 for the consideration of the law does not\n16\n     require futile acts. United States v. Olafson, 213 F.3d 435, 441 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations\n17\n     omitted). Given the circumstances before the Court and applying Federal Rule 1, the Court\n18\n     should simply order H&A to comply with the subpoena within twenty days of an order.\n19\n20      Respectfully submitted April 25, 2023.\n\n21                                                 /s/ Ryan Isenberg\n                                                   Ryan Isenberg\n22\n23\n24\n25\n26\n27\n                                                       5\n28\n\f           Case 2:18-cv-02097-JAD-VCF Document 150 Filed 04/25/23 Page 6 of 6\n\n\n\n\n 1                                          Certificate of Service\n 2          This is to certify that I have this day served the withing and foregoing Reply Brief upon\n 3\n     Higbee & Associates by filing the same using the Court\u2019s CM/ECF system, which will generate\n 4\n     notice to all counsel of record.\n 5\n                                                         /s/ Ryan Isenberg\n 6\n 7\n 8\n 9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\n26\n27\n                                                     6\n28\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2023-05-03T12:20:10.589398-07:00","document_number":"150","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"11509935819","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-05-03T12:19:49.247939-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.472053-07:00","date_filed":"2023-04-25","time_filed":null,"entry_number":150,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-04-25.001","pacer_sequence_number":516,"description":"REPLY to Response to 147 Motion to Compel, by Defendant 4Internet, LLC.. (Isenberg, Ryan) (Entered: 04/25/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/306904029/","id":306904029,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/14767335/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/313143247/","id":313143247,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/14767335/149/miller-v-4internet-llc/","date_created":"2023-05-03T12:19:49.240845-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.456794-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"149","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2023-05-03T12:19:49.231619-07:00","date_modified":"2025-08-15T10:44:54.438284-07:00","date_filed":"2023-04-24","time_filed":null,"entry_number":149,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-04-24.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 5-1(b). ECF No. 148 Response was not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b). Please note the signatory must be the attorney or pro se party who electronically files the document. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. (no image attached) (EDS) (Entered: 04/24/2023)","tags":[]}],"entries_total":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=14767335&page_size=40"}