{"cached_at":"2026-10-23T10:51:04.290288+00:00","cl_docket_id":"67809303","docket":{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","id":67809303,"court":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/courts/txnd/","court_id":"txnd","original_court_info":null,"idb_data":null,"clusters":[],"audio_files":[],"assigned_to":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/people/14421/","referred_to":null,"bankruptcy_information":null,"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2023-09-19T13:28:02.877395-07:00","date_modified":"2025-06-21T10:53:54.965655-07:00","source":1,"appeal_from_str":"","assigned_to_str":"Ada Brown","referred_to_str":"","panel_str":"","date_last_index":"2024-01-18T06:12:02.063025-08:00","date_cert_granted":null,"date_cert_denied":null,"date_argued":null,"date_reargued":null,"date_reargument_denied":null,"date_filed":"2023-09-19","date_terminated":"2024-09-03","date_last_filing":"2024-10-24","case_name_short":"","case_name":"Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. ACI Payments Inc","case_name_full":"","slug":"nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc","docket_number":"3:23-cv-02089","docket_number_core":"2302089","docket_number_raw":"3:23-cv-02089","docket_number_source":0,"federal_dn_office_code":"3","federal_dn_case_type":"cv","federal_dn_judge_initials_assigned":"E","federal_dn_judge_initials_referred":"","federal_defendant_number":null,"pacer_case_id":"381329","cause":"18:1030 Computer Fraud & Abuse Act","nature_of_suit":"190 Contract: Other Contract","jury_demand":"Plaintiff","jurisdiction_type":"Federal Question","appellate_fee_status":"","appellate_case_type_information":"","mdl_status":"","filepath_ia":"","filepath_ia_json":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"ia_needs_upload":true,"ia_date_first_change":"2023-09-19T13:28:02.875684-07:00","date_blocked":null,"blocked":false,"appeal_from":null,"parent_docket":null,"tags":[],"panel":[]},"parties":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12974487/","id":12974487,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927591/","attorney_id":8927591,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927591/","attorney_id":8927591,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927588/","attorney_id":8927588,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927588/","attorney_id":8927588,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927589/","attorney_id":8927589,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927590/","attorney_id":8927590,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2023-09-25T08:04:05.362974-07:00","date_modified":"2023-09-25T08:04:05.362984-07:00","name":"ACI Worldwide Inc","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12974486/","id":12974486,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927591/","attorney_id":8927591,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927591/","attorney_id":8927591,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":4},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927588/","attorney_id":8927588,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927588/","attorney_id":8927588,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927589/","attorney_id":8927589,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927590/","attorney_id":8927590,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2023-09-25T08:04:05.356722-07:00","date_modified":"2023-09-25T08:04:05.356732-07:00","name":"ACI Worldwide Corp","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12974485/","id":12974485,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927588/","attorney_id":8927588,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927588/","attorney_id":8927588,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927589/","attorney_id":8927589,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8927590/","attorney_id":8927590,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"name":"Defendant","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2023-09-25T08:04:05.345533-07:00","date_modified":"2023-09-25T08:04:05.345543-07:00","name":"ACI Payments Inc","extra_info":""},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/parties/12974484/","id":12974484,"attorneys":[{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8689284/","attorney_id":8689284,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":2},{"attorney":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/attorneys/8689284/","attorney_id":8689284,"date_action":null,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"role":1}],"party_types":[{"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","docket_id":67809303,"name":"Plaintiff","date_terminated":null,"extra_info":"doing business as\nMr. Cooper","highest_offense_level_opening":"","highest_offense_level_terminated":"","criminal_counts":[],"criminal_complaints":[]}],"date_created":"2023-09-25T08:04:05.302135-07:00","date_modified":"2023-09-25T08:04:05.302153-07:00","name":"Nationstar Mortgage LLC","extra_info":""}],"entries":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/401121119/","id":401121119,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/410409485/","id":410409485,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2024-09-03T07:19:35.322863-07:00","date_modified":"2024-09-03T07:19:35.327445-07:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order of Dismissal or Administrative Closure","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-09-03T07:19:35.309381-07:00","date_modified":"2024-09-03T07:19:35.309391-07:00","date_filed":"2024-09-03","time_filed":"08:39:55","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-09-03.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/400329812/","id":400329812,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/409559760/","id":409559760,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/22/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-08-23T15:02:15.482892-07:00","date_modified":"2024-08-24T02:09:57.746751-07:00","sha1":"7549a908c642b3a11b826c14ec12ddc4e8eb9fb5","page_count":14,"file_size":775708,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.381329/gov.uscourts.txnd.381329.22.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.381329/gov.uscourts.txnd.381329.22.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"Case 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 1 of 14. PagelD: 215\" \u00a2 ees\n| TIED\n|\n\nIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ,,\nFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS | <>\nDALLAS DIVISION |\n\nAUG 23 2024\n\nSPECIAL ORDER NO. 3-354\n\nEffective August 23, 2024, the cases listed on Exhibit A to this order are transferred to\nMagistrate Judge Brian McKay and shall henceforth carry the suffix letters \u201cBW.\u201d Magistrate\nJudge McKay shall seek consent of the parties in these cases to conduct all further proceedings\nand order the entry of final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 636(c). Ifall parties do not\nconsent, Magistrate Judge McKay shall, unless the assigned district judge otherwise orders,\n\nexercise all powers permitted by 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 636(b).\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nAugust 23, 2024\n\nDect (_ wes\n\nDAVID C. GODBEY\nCHIEF JUDGE\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 2of14 PagelD 216\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE RENEE H. TOLIVER TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n1 2:24-CV-0142-BK Hasan v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n\n2 3:18-CV-1933-N Lexor Manufacturing LLC v. Luraco Ine, et al.\n\n3 3:19-CV-2204-X Retail Ready Career Center inc v. United States of America, et al.\n\n4 3:19-CV-2218-E Southwest Airlines Co v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc\n\n5 3:19-CV-2281-K FTC v. Match Group\n\n6 3:20-CV-0656-K-BK Buzz Photo, et al. v. People's Republic of China, et al.\n\n7 3:20-CV-2935-N Carswell v. Hunt County Texas, et al.\n\n8 3:20-CV-3718-D Samurai Global LLC v. Landmark American Insurance Company\n3:21-CV-0116-B Rainier Arms LLC, et al. v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and\n\n9 Explosives, et al.\n\n10 3:21-CV-0840-E TNT Quadrangle Partner, LP, et al. v. SRPF B/Quadrangle Property, LLC, et al.\n\n11 3:21-CV-1764-D Vess v. City of Dallas, et al.\n\n412 3:21-CV-2429-L Raskin, et al. v. Dallas Independent Schoo! District, et al.\n\n13 3:22-CV-0654-N Salt and Light Energy Equipment LLC v. Crigin Bancorp\n\n14 3:22-CV-0663-E United States of America v. All Funds in 199 Bank Accounts Located in India\n\n15 3:22-CV-0780-M State of Texas, et al. v. Biden, et al.\n\n16 3:22-CV-0907-5 Hilltop Holdings Inc v. AlG Specialty Insurance Company\n\n17 3:22-CV-1185-X Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company v. Morgan\n\n18 3:22-CV-1869-E Walsh v. Peterson\n\n19 3:22-CV-2118-X Securities and Exchange Commission v. Barton, et al.\n\n20 3:22-CV-2272-S Thomas v. McDonough, et al.\n\n21 3:22-CV-2597-K Pearson, et al. v. Gage\n\n22 3:22-CV-2624-B Iske v. Precision Dynamics International LLC\n\n23 3:22-CV-2763-E Boy Scouts of America v. Touch A Life Foundation Inc\n\n24 3:22-MC-0079-X-BK NiRB v. LM Carpet\n\n25 3:23-CV-0037-5 Young v. Baylor Scott & White Health\n\n26 3:23-CV-0133-B Endurance American Insurance Company v. Lloyd's Syndicate 3624\n\n27 3:23-CV-0313-S G Thomas Air LLC v. Pratt & Whitney Engine Services Inc\n\n28 3:23-CV-0342-M Ariat International Inc v. Khemchand Handicrafts Limited, et ai.\n\n29 3:23-CV-0464-D Alford v. Wonderland Montessori Academy LLC\n\n30 3:23-CV-0584-G Lee Ir v. United States\n3:23-CV-0640-D M Central Residences Condominium Association Inc v. Technology\n\n31 Insurance Company Inc\n\n32 3:23-CV-0641-L Securities and Exchange Commission v. McKnight\n\n33 3:23-CV-0811-E Alawei v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service\n\n34 3:23-CV-0881-X GS Holistic LCC v. Sri Manakamana Inc\n\n35 3:23-CV-0910-B Brandon Architects Inc v. Olerio Home LLC\n\n36 3:23-CV-0954-X Lopez v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.\n\n37 3:23-CV-0965-X Wilcox v. Equifax Information Services LLC\n\n38 3:23-CV-1171-K Modern Vascular of Southaven LLC, et al. v. Qlarant Integrity Solutions LLC\n\n39 3:23-CV-1198-G White v. American Economy Insurance Company\n\n40 3:23-CV-1351-X $2 Brothers LLC v. AmGuard Insurance Company\n\n41 3:23-CV-1399-G Dill v. Experian Information Solutions Inc\n\n1\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 3o0f14 PagelD 217\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE RENEE H. TOLIVER TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n42 3:23-CV-1457-5 Denison Glass & Mirror Ine v. EFCO LLC\n\n43 3:23-CV-1559-B Fitton v. Pinnacle Propane LLC\n\n44 3:23-CV-1574-E Johnson, et al. v. Dallas County Hospital District, et al.\n\n45 3:23-CV-1583-E Hernandez v. Brown\n\n46 3:23-CV-1663-D-BK Hill v. Norman, et ai.\n\n47 3:23-CV-1698-L-BK Jaffari v. Garland, et al.\n\n48 3:23-CV-1772-B Uliman v. OBM Miami\n\n49 3:23-CV-1915-B-BK Pinson v. Dallas Cnty. Sherriff\u2019s Office, et al.\n\n50 3:23-CV-1918-N Martinez v. Kroger\n3:23-CV-1945-D-BK Thornton v. Dallas County d/b/a Dallas County District Attorney's Office, et\n\n51 al.\n\n52 3:23-CV-2088-L-BK Gordon v. Kellam\n\n53 3:23-CV-2090-N-BK Tyson v. Commissioner of Social Security\n\n54 3:23-CV-2094-N-BK Humble v. Enge, et al.\n\n55 3:23-CV-2112-D King v. SeaHarbor Insurance Agency LLC\n\n56 3:23-CV-2162-5 Sealed v. Sealed\n\n57 3:23-CV-2195-X-BK Ashley v. DOL\n\n58 3:23-CV-2212-B Hunter v. Procollect Inc\n\n59 3:23-CV-2231-5 82 Glenwood Avenue LLC v. Schutze, et al.\n\n60 3:23-CV-2385-BK Fernandez v. Social Security Administration\n\n61 3:23-CV-2412-D Beasley v. Castle Credit Co Holdings LLC\n\n62 3:23-CV-2438-N-BK Blanks v, Federal Correctional Institution Seagoville, et al.\n\n63 3:23-CV-2493-K-BK Dickerson v. Conduent Commercial! Solutions LLC\n\n64 3:23-CV-2656-K-BK United States of America v. Rehab 4 Work Services LLC, et al.\n\n65 3:23-CV-2728-B Factor Mutual Insurance Company v. Southwest Pumps LLC, et al.\n\n66 3:24-CV-0013-B SW Marine v. Valentine\n\n67 3:24-CV-0072-E Katz v. Gruenberg, et al.\n\n68 3:24-CV-0104-E Tupac v. Asbury Automotive Group Inc, et al.\n\n69 3:24-CV-0112-E-BK Keys v. Connors et al.\n\n70 3:24-CV-0113-K-BK Smith v. Federai Bureau of Prisons, et al.\n\n71 3:24-CV-0148-B Samiappan v. Su\n\n72 3:24-CV-0244-N Sukin v. Experian Information Soiutions Inc, et al.\n\n73 3:24-CV-0298-G Liu v. U.S. Department of State, et ai.\n\n74 3:24-CV-0376-X Colonna, et al. v. LoanDepot.com LLC\n\n75 3:24-CV-0626-S-BK Alfano v. Allred Unit Mailroom\n\n76 3:24-CV-1060-L-BK Butler v. Lee at al\n\n77 3:24-CV-1063-D Rodriguez v. ALDI Inc\n\n78 3:24-CV-1083-K G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Frida's Tacos LLC, et al.\n\n79 3:24-CV-1089-X Feit Electric Company Inc v. Elong international USA Inc, et al.\n\n80 3:24-CV-1117-K Umoru v. Walmart Stores Texas LLC\n\n81 3:24-CV-1149-X-BK Central States Health and Welfare Fund v. Contreras\n3:24-CV-1151-X Dallas Food & Beverage LLC, et al. v. United States Smail Business\n\n82 Administration, et al.\n\n83 3:24-CV-1245-B Sealed v. Sealed\n\n84 3:24-CV-1367-S Jain, et al. v. Jaddou\n\n85 3:24-CV-1416-G-BK Henderson v. Trump\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 4of14 PagelD 218\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE RENEE H. TOLIVER TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n86 3:24-CV-1422-5 Kearney v. Equifax Information Services LLC\n\n87 3:24-CV-1551-B Zachary v. Environmental Protection Agency\n\n88 3:24-CV-1587-S-BK Henderson v. Trump\n\n89 3:24-CV-1621-G Hamilton v. Walmart Inc\n\n90 3:24-CV-1677-X EYM Pizza of Georgia LLC, et al. v. Pizza Hut LLC, et al.\n\n91 3:24-CV-1705-D Ogboru v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company\n92 3:24-MC-0017-E NFinity IP v. Varsity Spirit\n\n93 4:24-CV-0592-BK Johnson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration\n\n94 5:23-CV-0259-BK Arguello v. Social Security Administration\n\n95 5:23-CV-0281-BK Murphy v. Social Security Administration\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page5of14 PagelD 219\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n1 3:16-cv-00764-N VidStream LLC v. Twitter Inc\nCapio Funding LLC v. Rural/Metro Operating\n2 3:17-cv-02713-X Company LLC et al\n3 3:19-cv-01067-K Von Colditz v. Woods et af\n4 3:20-cv-00045-D Rodriguez v. Southern Health Partners Inc et al\n5 3:20-cv-00313-N Hamilton et al v. Dallas County\n6 3:20-cv-01358-E Coleman et al v. Brozen et al\n7 3:20-cv-03636-K Blue Yonder Group inc v. Kinaxis inc et al\n8 3:21-cv-01498-B Halperin et al v. Wills et al\n9 3:22-cv-00034-X McClung et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC et al\n10 3:22-cv-00141-N-BN Bell v. Moore\nit 3:22-cv-00525-X Fiberco, Inc. v. Acadia Insurance Company\nHighland Capital Management LP et al v. Highland Capital Management Fund\n12 3:22-cv-00789-X Advisors LP\n13 3:22-cv-00794-$ Legacy Exploration LLC v. Optimum Energy Partners LLC et al\n14 3:22-cv-01498-G-BN Timmons v. Director\n45 3:22-cy-01581-G-BN Sharper v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n416 3:22-cv-01600-G-BN Matthews v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n17 3:22-cv-01871-G-BN Turner v. O'Daniel\n18 3:22-cv-02062-X Shuler Drilling Company Inc v. Disiere Partners LLC, et al\n19 3:22-cv-02312-G-BN Mornes v, Director, TDCJ-CID\n20 3:22-cv-02403-N-BN Carey v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n21 3:22-cv-02410-G Castillo v. Walmart Inc et ai\n22 3:22-cv-02589-S-BN Minze v. Director, TOCJ-CID\n23 3:22-cv-02600-X Venzant v. Bigelow Arizona TX-282 LP et al\n24 3:22-cv-02891-N-BN Carcamo v. Director, FDCJ-CID\n25 3:23-cv-00057-K-BN Turner v. Wellpath Med Co\n26 3:23-cv-00066-B-BN Hernandez v. Director, TDCJ-CID\nTrustees of the IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund et al v. Rockey\n27 3:23-cv-00224-B Electric Inc\n28 3:23-cv-00280-K Mercury Associates Inc v. Primoris Services Corporation\n29 3:23-cv-00303-N Paige v. State Farm Lloyds\n30 3:23-cv-00337-X-BN Roccaforte v. Transunion\n31 3:23-cv-00338-N-BN Roccaforte v. Experian information Solutions Inc\n32 3:23-cv-00339-E-BN Roccaforte v. Equifax Inc\n33 3:23-cv-00355-X EDN Global Inc et al v. AT&T Mobility Services LUC et al\n34 3:23-cv-G0391-D Walker v. Hoffman et al\n35 3:23-cv-00410-E-BN Lewis v. Equifax\n36 3:23-cv-00435-B-BN Lewis v. Experian\n37 3:23-cv-00508-N Doe v. Backpage.com LLC et al\n38 3:23-cv-00547-K Bilbo v. Central Transport LLC\n39 3:23-cv-00568-B Cunningham v. State Farm Lloyds\n40 3:23-cv-00574-B Martin v. Penske Logistics LLC\n41 3:23-cv-80603-E Bridging Biosciences LLC v, Esch et al\n42 3:23-cv-00668-E-BN Spillman Jr v. Director, TDCI-CID\n43 3:23-cv-00706-E Arka Mesquite Investments LLC et al v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company\n44 3:23-cv-00736-M Powell v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana\n45 3:23-cv-00755-M-BN Toliver v. Director, TDCJ-CID\n46 3:23-cv-00772-E-BN Cloninger v. Director, TDC)-CID\n47 3:23-cv-00819-G White v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 6\u00e9of14 PagelD 220\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n# Case No. Case Name\n4g 3:23-cv-00844-M Bellinger v. CureWave Lasers LLC et al\n49 3:23-cv-00852-G New York inn Inc et al v, Associated Industries Insurance Company Inc\n50 3:23-cv-00882-L GS Holistic LLC v. B Over 21 Inc et al\n51 3:23-cv-00915-B SMA v. Salesforce et al\n52 3:23-cv-00948-K Eder v. City of Burleson\n53 3:23-cv-00977-5 Brown v. Sarn\u2019s East Inc\n54 3:23-cv-01016-D Johnson v. Epsilon Data Management LLC\n55 3:23-cv-01018-X Licht v. Ling et al\n56 3:23-cv-01024-L GS Holistic LLC v. OMS Investment LLC et al\n57 3:23-cv-01039-B Jone Doe AS v. Salesforce Inc et a!\n58 3:23-cv-01089-N-BN Rountree v, FedEx Ground Package System Inc\n59 3:23-cv-01228-G Garcia v. Fiesta Mart LLC et al\n60 3:23-cv-01230-B Horton et al v. Heppner et al\n61 3:23-cv-01286-E Warner v. Equifax information Services LLC et ai\n62 3:23-cv-01301-X Dheera Limited Company v. Johnson Controls Inc et ai\n63 3:23-cv-01320-N-BN Silvers v. Director, TOCJ-CIB\n64 3:23-cv-01339-E Terri E Newkirk IRA v. Kelly e\u00a2 al\n65 3:23-cv-01345-L Russell v. Kroger Texas, LP\n66 3:23-cv-01356-L-BN Perez v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al\n6&7 3:23-cv-01366-N Husinger v. Smart Start Real estate Corporation\n68 3:23-cv-01376-X Harris v. Papa Texas LLC\n69 3:23-cv-01468-D Nieves v. Uber Technologies Inc et al\n70 3:23-cv-01484-L Red Barn Candle Company ELC v. Bath & Body Works Brand Management Inc\n7t 3:23-cv-01497-L Rittman v. Amguard Insurance Company\n72 3:23-cv-01502-G-BN Cook v. Costco Wholesale Corporation\n73 3:23-cv-01503-B Charitable DAF Fund LP et al v. Highland Capital Management LP\n74 3:23-cv-01517-N Bahamas Laguna Azure LLC v. City of Royse City, Texas\n75 3:23-cv-01525-X Biovant LLC v. BTEAG LLC et al\n76 3:23-cv-01548-5 Cobbs v. Baylor Scott & White\n77 3:23-cv-01557-D Clark v. Wyndham Worldwide, Inc\n78 3:23-cv-01561-K Erwin et al v. Metalcraft of Mayville Inc\n79 3:23-cv-01565-S-BN Fields v. Kelley\n80 3:23-cv-01617-X Holmes v. Equifax information Services LLC et al\n81 3:23-cv-01621-5 Niter et al v. Brown et al\n82 3:23-cv-01669-B Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n83 3:23-cv-01674-B Brookfield Property Retail Holdings LLC et ai v. Dillard Texas Central LLC\n84 3:23-cv-01675-L Van-Zandt Reiss et al v. The Bank of New York Melon\n&5 3:23-cv-01679-E Harris v. HireRight LLC\n86 3:23-cv-01775-X Palmer v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc\n87 3:23-cv-01791-L SPBL-1119 LLC v. Arciterra Strategic Retail Advisor LLC et al\n8&8 3:23-cv-01793-L LSM Blue Sky LLC v. AT Olathe Outlot 5 LLC et al\n89 3:23-cv-01802-E Megehee v. Pallida LLC\n90 3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al\n91 3:23-cv-01832-8 Doe v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al\n92 3:23-cv-01870-K GS Holistic LLC v. GNS Sons Inc\n93 3:23-cv-01889-S Velis v. Bangert et al\n94 3:23-cv-01910-E Hagans v. Child Care Group\n95 3:23-cv-01912-S Lessig v. Fiesta Mart LLC\n96 3:23-cv-01937-N Kustom Signals Inc v. Applied Concepts Inc\n97 3:23-cv-01972-L Owens v. Dallas Country Club\n98 3:23-cv-01973-K-BN Bohemond v. City of Dallas TX\n99 3:23-cv-01998-B Harland v. Workforce outsource Services Inc\n\n5\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 7of14 PagelD 221\n\nExhibit A\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n\n100 3:23-cv-02009-G-BN Hunsinger v. Atmos Energy Corporation\n\n101 3:23-cv-02010-B Johnson et al v. Crosby Elementary School et al\n3:23-cv-02011-B\n\n102 Sample v. SLI Enterprises Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02023-B\n\n103 Promed LLC v, Quintairos Prieto Wood & Boyer PA\n3:23-cv-02050-X\n\n104 Taste of Chengdu LLC v. Feng\n3:23-cv-G2070-G6\n\n105 Summers v. Longbrake et al\n3:23-cv-02071-E\n\n106 Hunter Mountain Investment Trust et al v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n3:23-cv-02097-X\n\n107 Holcamb v. Monitronics International\n3:23-cv-02110-B\n\n108 Consumer Data Partners, LP et al v. Agentra LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02126-5\n\n109 Mosure et al. v. Southwest Airlines, Co.\n3:23-cv-02143-N\n\n110 Dillard v. Gaines Investment Trust et al\n3:23-cv-02148-K-BN\n\n411 Booth v. US Bank Trust NA\n3:23-ev-02155-L\n\n412 cici Enterprises LP v. HSB Specialty Insurance Company\n3:23-cv-02158-D\n\n113 Wilson v. Korth Direct Mortgage et al\n3:23-cv-02203-E\n\n114 Warehouse Solutions Inc v. Plus Veterans, LLC\n3:23-cv-02214-$\n\n115 Big Games Management LLC v. Bespoke Piush LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02232-B\n\n116 Campbell v. Methodist Hospitais of Dallas et al\n3:23-cv-02238-E\n\n117 Cameron v. QT South LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02243-E\n\n118 Paez v. Childrens Health System of Texas\n3:23-cv-02284-G\n\n119 Stanley v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC\n3:23-cv-02286-X\n\n120 Brandon Wade Photography LLC v. Killian Design LLC\n3:23-cv-02292-L\n\n121 Lloyd v. Athena Condominiums Co-Owners Association\n3:23-cv-02294-B-BN\n\n422 Andrews v. York et af\n3:23-cv-02307-G\n\n123 Lee v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02367-K\n\n124 City of Dallas v. Triple D Gear, LLC\n3:23-cv-02387-L\n\n125 Nasrallah v. Scottsdale Insurance Company\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 8of14 PagelD 222\n\nExhibit A\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n# Case No. Case Name\n3:23-cv-02404-L\n126 Lilium GVP LLC v. Transportation Insurance Company et al\n3:23-cv-02421-X\n127 Principal Life Insurance Company v. Roque et al\n3:23-cv-02457-B-BN\n428 Young v. United Parcel Service Inc (Ohio)\n3:23-cv-02494-\u00a7\n4129 Hossain v. The Boeing Company\n3:23-cv-02504-K\n130 DAV Sub Inc v. QligSOFT Inc\n3:23-cv-02531-E\n131 Dawson v. Union Pacific Railroad\n3:23-cv-02532-E-BN\n132 Randle v. Brown et al\n3:23-cv-02539-X\n133 Bowers v. Uplift Education\n3:23-cv-02547-E\n134 Session v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al\n3:23-cv-02594-E\n135 Verna IP Holdings LLC v. Dais Inc\n\n3:23-cv-02624-N\n\n136 Doe v. International Association of Eating Disorder Professionals Foundation Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02633-S\n137 Motton v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC\n3:23-cv-02670-E\n138 Samadian v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company\n3:23-cv-02671-X\n139 APOD Group ELC v. Glen Lakes Homeowners Association Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02673-G\n140 Elliott v. Gonzalez et al\n3:23-cv-02708-B\n144 Dishmon v. Newkirk Logistics Inc\n3:23-cv-02725-D\n142 Pradia v. The City of Rhome et al\n3:23-cv-02737-N\n143 Rollins-Booker v. Senture LLC\n3:23-cv-02770-S\n144 Camacho v. Sajeda Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02795-E\n145 Coil v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al\n3:23-cv-02807-K\n146 Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Williams et al\n3:23-cv-02827-G-BN\n447 Moka v. Huntex Properties LLC et al\n3:23-cv-02830-X\n148 Mesa Digital LLC v. One Plus USA Corp\n3:23-cv-02834-E\n149 Canada, Jr. et al v. Sherman\n3:23-cv-02839-E\n150 Accurate Metal Stamping LLC v. Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company et al\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page9of14 PagelD 223\n\nExhibit A\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n3:24-cv-00002-L\n\n151 McLaughlin et al v. Family Assets Management LLC\n3:24-cv-00004-N\n\n152 Hill v. Garcia et af\n3:24-cv-00631-L\n\n153 Great American Insurance v, Truckmax Inc\n3:24-cv-00098-L\n\nLeon Capital Group LEC et al v. Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Company\n\n154 et al\n3:24-cv-00122-B\n\n455 Slate/Sefect Inc v. Martin Marietta Materials Inc et al\n3:24-cv-00191-E\n\n156 Crum & Forster Insurance Company v. Shreno Limited\n3:24-cv-00255-E\n\n157 Blacknall v. Allata LLC et al\n3:24-cv-00285-G-BN\n\n158 Davis et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et ai\n3:24-cv-00331-5\n\n159 Tafolla v. Wacker et al\n3:24-cv-00341-S\n\n160 Forsythe et al v. Equifax Information Services LLC et ai\n3:24-cv-00347-K\n\n161 Homesteaders Life Company v. Williams\n3:24-cv-00361-E\n\n162 Kendrick v. QuickTrip Corporation\n3:24-cv-00382-B\n\n463 US Bank National Association v. Malloy\n3:24-cv-00388-E\n\n164 Elioznde v. Randalls Food and Drug LP\n3:24-cv-00417-X\n\n165 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe\n3:24-cv-00434-L\n\n166 G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Aguifar\n3:24-cv-00498-K\n\n167 Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC v. Dondero et al\n3:24-cv-00528-B\n\n168 Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Doe\n3:24-cv-00544-D-BN\n\n169 Rector v. Director, TDC)-CID\n3:24-cv-00568-N\n\n170 Strong v. Bank of America Corporation et al\n3:24-cv-00569-5\n\ni71 Haag Engineering Co v. Ellis et al\n3:24-cv-00647-L\n\n172 Languasco et al v. Blair Logistics LLC\n3:24-cv-00658-5\n\n173 Gardner v. The Lincoin National Life Insurance Company\n3:24-cv-00691-D\n\n174 Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP\n3:24-ev-00702-L\n\n175 Birrueta v. State Farm Lloyds\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 10o0f14 PagelD 224\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n# Case No. Case Name\n3:24-cv-00728-X-BN\n\n176 Said v. EAN Holdings LLC et al\n3:24-cv-00791-E\n\n177 Wilson v. British Airways PLC\n3:24-cv-00796-L\n\n178 Sanchez v. Caliber Holdings LLC\n\n179 3:24-cv-00798-E King v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC\n3:24-cv-00809-S\n\n180 Kenney et al v. Dallas County Texas\n3:24-cv-00817-B\n\n181 Children's Health System of Texas v. UnitedHeaithcare Insurance Company\n3:24-cv-00892-B\n\n182 Toombs et al v. Kaufman County, Texas et al\n3:24-cv-00905-E-BN\n\n183 Rass v. Texas Instruments\n3:24-cv-00909-K-BN\n\n184 Bryant v. EverBank NA\n3:24-cv-00971-X\n\n185 Morgan v. Fundamental Clinical And Operational Services LLC\n3:24-cv-01020-X\n\n186 The Shore Firm LLP v. Videoshare LLC\n\n187 3:24-cv-01051-5 Gilliard v. Southwest Airlines Federal Credit Union\n3:24-ev-01075-N\n\n188 Ayangbile et al v. Children's Health Services of Texas\n3:24-cyv-011329-X\n\n189 Ray v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al\n3:24-cv-01175-S-BN\n\n190 Romero et al v. US Bank National Association\n3:24-cv-01198-L\n\n191 Nautilus Hyosung America Inc v. BMO Bank NA et al\n3:24-cv-01209-D\n\n192 American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Southwest Airlines Co\n3:24-cv-01233-5\n\n193 Smith v. Montez et al\n3:24-cv-01262-D\n\n194 Brandon Wade Photography, LLC v. OTC Bar LLC\n3:24-cv-01288-D-BN\n\n195 Williams v. Richardson Independent School District\n3:24-cv-01319-G\n\n196 Daniels-Mock v. Taxir Logistics Inc et al\n3:24-cv-01326-K-BN\n\n197 Wickman v. Navarro County Jail\n3:24-cv-01339-B\n\n198 Travers v. Allstate Vehicle and Property insurance Company\n3:24-cv-01358-E\n\n199 Joe Hand Promotions inc v. Carbajal et at\n3:24-cv-01370-D-BN\n\n200 Council v. Draftkings et al\n3:24-cv-01397-K\n\n201 PacSec3 LLC v. RSA Federal LLC\n3:24-cv-01413-X\n\n202 Guillen et al v. U-Haul Company of Texas et al\n\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 11of14 PagelD 225\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n# Case No. Case Name\n203 3:24-cv-01418-L Wilson v. Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.\n3:24-cv-O1447-E\n204 Akhmedov v. TA Operating LLC\n3:24-cv-01461-K\n205 Moreno et al v. Alan Halperin, In his capacity as Trustee of the GFES Liquidation Trust\n3:24-cv-01479-$\n206 NexPoint Real Estate Partners LLC et al v. Highland Capital Management LP\n3:24-cv-01483-G\n207 Amazon.com Inc et al v. Baik et al\n3:24-cv-01519-B-BN\n208 Robinson-Durham v. Navarro County Jail\n3:24-cv-01531-X\n209 Dugaboy Investment Trust et al v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n3:24-cv-01541-B\n210 Sanchez et al v. Schneider National Carriers Inc et al\n3:24-cv-01554-D\n211 Hernandez v. Bishop Cider Company LLC et al\n3:24-cv-01563-D\nWLands Limited Partnership LP et al v. Founders Plaza Nursing & Rehabilitation\n212 Partners LLC et al\n213 3:24-cv-01603-X Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n214 3:24-cv-01610-E Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n215 3:24-cv-01641-D Elizondo v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n2156 3:24-cv-01642-K Aurzada et af v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al\n217 3:24-cv-01646-G-BN Sharman v. H&R Block et al\n218 3:24-cv-01647-N Rodriguez v. Home Depot USA inc\n219 3:24-cv-01684-L Criss v. Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc\n220 3:24-cv-01685-G Harris v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n221 3:24-cv-01692-N Ricker v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al\n222 3:24-cv-01711-D Mitchel v, Pitre et al\n223 3:24-cv-01717-K Ayala v. Chedraui USA Inc\n224 3:24-cv-01716-L Hutchinson v. Sunrun Inc\n225 3:24-cv-01720-K Miller v. Xpress Global Systems LLC\ngag \u00ab| 3:44-cv-01743-L Collier v. Carter\n227 3:24-Cv-01768-S Bosman v. Amazon.com inc et al\n3:24-cv-01786-L\n228 Hunter Mountain Investment Trust et al v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n3:24-cv-01787-L\n229 Hunter Mountain Investment Trust et al v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n230 3:24-cv-01796-8 Larsen v. Apt All Points Transportation LLC et al\n231 3:24-cv-01811-D McAfee v. Lear Corporation\n232 3:24-cv-01821-K Ryan LLC v, Radin\n233 3:24-cv-01839-E Forstey v. Jordan et al\n234 3:24-cv-01873-X Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n235 3:24-cv-01882-X Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe\n236 3:24-cv-01908-D Hibdon v. Atrium Hospitality LP\n3:24-cv-01912-L\n237 Hunter Mountain Investment Trust v. Highland Capital Management LP et al\n\n10\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 12o0f14 PagelD 226\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE DAVID L. HORAN TO JUDGE MCKAY\n# Case No. Case Name\n238 3:24-cv-01949-X Alentisar Trading Company v. Eyondi et al\n239 3:24-cv-01967-S-BN Willtams v. Richardson ISD\n\n41\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 130f14 PagelD 227\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE REBECCA RUTHERFORD\nTO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n1 3:22-cv-02887-L-BT Murphy v. Director\n\n2 3:23-cv-00316-B-BT Marcus v. Director\n\n3 3:23-cv-00978-D-BT Walton v. USA\n\n4 3:23-cv-02449-D-BT Manzo v. Federal Bureau of Prisons\n\n5 3:23-cv-2677-S-BT Jackson v. Smali Business Administration et al\n\n6 3:24-cv-00175-S-BT Gonzales v. Collier\n\n7 3:24-cv-00661-B-BT Hammons v. Tradeline Motorcars et al\n\n8 3:24-cv-00637-S-BT Humes v. McDonald's Walmart #5416-945\n\n9 3:24-cv-01708-X-BT Traeger v. Jones et al\n\n10 3:23-cv-00315-X-BT Duhon v. Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company et al\n\n11 3:23-cv-02194-8-BT Walters v. Garland\n\n12 3:23-cv-02157-L-BT United States of America v. Morgan et al\n3:24-cv-00277-L National Association of Blind Merchants et al v. The Army & Air Force Exchange\n\n13 Service et al\n\n14 3:24-cv-00273-N-BT De Pute v. United States of America et al\n\n15 3:24-cv-00703-B-BT Freeman v. USA et al\n\n16 3:23-cv-01994-S-BT Davis v. City of Mclendon Chisholm et al\n\n17 3:24-cv-00731-L Crenshaw v. Anderson et al\n\n18 3:24-mc-00034-B-BT Calhoun v. United States\n\n19 3:23-cv-02682-5-BT Phoenix Bulk Carriers LLC v. CAL-IXA Aggregates LLC\n\n20 3:24-cv-01590-N-BT Jackson v. United States Postal Service et al\n\n27 3:24-cv-01759-B-BT Woods v. Delta Air Lines inc\n\n22 2:23-cv-00171-BT Row v. Commissioner\n\n23 1:24-cv-00083-BT Gonzales v. Commissioner\n\n24 5:23-cv-00293-BT Mims v. Commissioner\n\n25 3:14-cv-02970-X Clapper et al v. American Realty Investors Inc et al\n\n26 3:20-cv-01276-N Kunze et al v. Baylor Scott & White Health et al\n\n27 3:20-cv-01364-E Malbrew et al v. A+ Charter Schools\n\n28 3:21-cv-02131-K Bernstein v. Maximus Federal Services Inc\n\n29 3:22-cv-00876-N Grimmett et al v. Coleman et al\n\n30 3:22-cv-02116-X Black v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America\n\n31 3:22-cv-02182-M Range! de Oliveira v. Bierman\n\n32 3:22-cv-02184-B Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Vibrant Builders et ai\n\n33 3:23-cv-00271-K Green v. USA\n\n34 3:23-cv-01340-L Perez v. Experian Information Solutions Inc\n\n35 3:23-cv-01412-N Aravamuthan v. US Citizenship & immigration Service et al\n\n36 3:23-cv-01416-B8 Landmark American Insurance Company v. Richland Trace Owners Association Inc\n\n37 3:23-cv-01441-N Thompson v. McGehee et al\n\n38 3:23-cv-01490-S Norwood v. Dallas County Hospital District\n\n39 3:23-cv-01494-N Mathew v. Santander Consumer USA Inc\n\n40 3:23-cv-02051-N Shrestha et al v. USCIS et al\n\n41 3:23-cv-02089-E Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. ACI Payments Inc et al\n\n42 3:22-cv-01529-N Oliver v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC et al\n\n12\n\fCase 3:22-cv-01529-N Document 28 Filed 08/23/24 Page 14o0f14 PagelD 228\n\nExhibit A\n\nCASES TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE DOCKET OF JUDGE REBECCA RUTHERFORD\nTO JUDGE MCKAY\n\n43 3:23-cv-00045-E Mauricio et al v. US Postal Service\n\n44 3:23-cv-01168-N-BT United States of America v. $39,900 in US Currency\n45 3:23-cv-02146-D Securities and Exchange Commission v. Verges et al\n\n46 3:23-cv-02222-K Heard et al v. State Farm Lloyds\n\n47 3:23-cv-02591-D Oldham v. State Farm Lloyds\n\n48 3:23-cv-02621-8 Sealed v. Sealed\n\n49 3:23-cv-02701-\u00a3 Pertrorock Mineral Holdings, LLC et al v. Minerva Resources, LLC et al\n50 3:23-cv-02271-S Hayes v. City of Dallas et al\n\n51 3:23-cv-02338-K Smith v. USA\n\n52 3:23-cv-02462-D Botone et al v. Unitrin Safeguard Insurance Company\n\n53 3:24-cv-00014-D Hardrick v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association et al\n54 3:24-cv-00201-K Ware et al v. Meridian Security Insurance Company\n\n55 3:24-cv-00204-X United States of America v. $45,000.00 in US Currency\n56 3:24-cv-00220-B Bayazeed v. Robinson et al\n\n57 3:24-cv-00664-X VDPP, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC\n\n58 3:24-cv-00700-X-BT Garrison v. John Doe et al\n\n59 3:24-cv-00943-E M&H Metal Specialties Inc v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat'l Pension Fd\n60 3:24-cv-00944-5 USA v. Various Amounts of Funds Seized\n\n61 3:24-cv-01169-B Nieto v. USA\n\n62 3:24-cv-01484-S5 Antunez-Martinez v. Mayorkas\n\n63 3:24-cv-01525-K Gonzales Miranda et al v. Jaddou\n\n64 3:24-cv-01674-E-BT Turner v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm et al\n65 3:24-cv-01676-S Bibars v. Jaddou et al\n\n66 3:24-cv-01795-S Valtrus Innovations Ltd et al v. Google LLC\n\n67 3:24-cv-01902-K-BT Allen-Straight v. Director-TBC)\n\n68 3:24-cv-02028-X-BT Lockwood v. Chilcoat et al\n\n69 3:24-cv-02114-K-BT Santana v. Cantu et al\n\n70 3:24-cv-02127-X-BT Stancu v. Equal Employment Cppertunity Commission\n71 3:24-cy-02132-S-BT Damm v. Dallas County Jail\n\n72 3:24-cv-02143-B-BT Jalloul v. USA\n\n73 3:24-cv-02144-5-BT Jeffery v. NLN\n\n74 4:24-cv-00678-B8T Bolden v. Commissioner\n\n13\n","ocr_status":1,"date_upload":"2024-08-23T15:02:15.769172-07:00","document_number":"22","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177017081985","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":false,"document_type":1,"description":"Order Reassigning Case AND ~Util - Set/Clear Flags","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-08-23T15:02:15.467718-07:00","date_modified":"2024-08-23T15:05:30.726866-07:00","date_filed":"2024-08-23","time_filed":"17:00:23","entry_number":22,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-08-23.001","pacer_sequence_number":77,"description":"Special Order No. 3-354: Effective August 23, 2024, the cases listed on Exhibit A to this order are transferred to Magistrate Judge Brian McKay and shall henceforth carry the suffix letters BW. This case has been reassigned pursuant to Special Order No. 3-354. (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Brian W McKay on 8/23/2024) (rekc)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926070/","id":375926070,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541887/","id":383541887,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.640190-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.655606-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.617134-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.617143-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-17","time_filed":null,"entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-17.002","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"Judge Ada Brown added per Order 21. Chief District Judge David C Godbey no longer assigned to case. (ali)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926069/","id":375926069,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541886/","id":383541886,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/21/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.591773-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.602923-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"21","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.560447-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.565600-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-17","time_filed":null,"entry_number":21,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-17.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"ELECTRONIC VOID ORDER: The Court VOIDS Electronic Order ECF #20. The above styled and numbered case remains on the docket of the Honorable Ada Brown, and shall henceforth carry the suffix letter E.. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 1/16/2024) (ndt) (Entered: 01/17/2024) (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 1/17/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 01/17/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926068/","id":375926068,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541885/","id":383541885,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/19/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.408454-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.418759-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"19","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.385353-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.389737-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-16","time_filed":null,"entry_number":19,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-16.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 17 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Courtney L. Snyder. Important Reminder: Unless excused for cause, an attorney who is not an ECF user must register within 14 days of the date the attorney appears in a case pursuant to LR 5.1(f) and LCrR 49.2(g). (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 1/16/2024) (chmb) (Entered: 01/16/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926067/","id":375926067,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541884/","id":383541884,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/18/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.358258-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-20T01:48:21.214765-08:00","sha1":"83bf1ffb2bf154dad3aca90d9d28ccda7a402820","page_count":18,"file_size":257731,"filepath_local":"recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.381329/gov.uscourts.txnd.381329.18.0.pdf","filepath_ia":"https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.381329/gov.uscourts.txnd.381329.18.0.pdf","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":" Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24   Page 1 of 18 PageID 133\n\n\n                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n                  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS\n                       DALLAS DIVISION\nNATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC d/b/a\nMR. COOPER,\n\n                Plaintiffs\n\n    v.\n                                         Civil Action No. 3:23-cv-02089-E\nACI PAYMENTS, INC., ACI\nWORLDWIDE CORP., ACI\nWORLDWIDE, INC.,\n\n                Defendants.\n\n\n           DEFENDANTS\u2019 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR\n             MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT\n\f      Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24                               Page 2 of 18 PageID 134\n\n\n\n                                         TABLE OF CONTENTS\n\n                                                                                                                       Page\n\nARGUMENT ............................................................................................................2\nI.       The Court Should Dismiss Nationstar\u2019s Contract Claims ..............................2\n         A.       Nationstar Failed to Plead Privity of Contract Necessary for Its\n                  Breach of Contract and Indemnification Claims..................................2\n\n         B.       Nationstar Failed to Plead Defendants Had Discretionary\n                  Authority, As Needed to State an Implied Covenant Claim ................ 3\n\nII.      The Court Should Dismiss Nationstar\u2019s Tort Claims.....................................4\n\n         A.       The DTSA, TUTSA, TTLA, and CFAA Claims Fail Because\n                  Nationstar Pled that It Provided NPI to Defendants ............................4\n\n         B.       Nationstar Failed to Plead the Existence of Third Party\n                  Contracts, As Needed for Its Tortious Interference Claim .................. 8\n\n         C.       The Negligence and Gross Negligence Claims Fail Because\n                  Nationstar Did Not Plead Defendants Owed a Special Duty of\n                  Care.......................................................................................................8\n\n         D.       The Economic Loss Doctrine Bars Nationstar\u2019s Tort Claims ............. 9\nIII.     The Complaint Should Be Dismissed for Group Pleading...........................10\nCONCLUSION .......................................................................................................11\n\n\n\n\n                                                              i\n\f   Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24                         Page 3 of 18 PageID 135\n\n\n\n                                   TABLE OF AUTHORITIES\n\n                                                                                                          Page\n\nCASES\n\nACQIS LLC v. Lenovo Grp. Ltd.,\n  2022 WL 2705269 (W.D. Tex. July 12, 2022) ...................................................10\n\nArkansas v. Wilmington Trust National Association,\n   2020 WL 1249570 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2020) ..................................................... 4\n\nAtrium Companies, Inc. v. ESR Assocs., Inc.,\n   2012 WL 5355754 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2012) ...................................................... 9\n\nBHL Boresight, Inc. v. Geo-Steering Sols., Inc.,\n  2017 WL 2730739 (S.D. Tex. June 26, 2017) ...................................................... 7\n\nBRG Insurance Solutions LLC v. O\u2019Connell,\n  2017 WL 7513649 (N.D. Tex. July 18, 2017) ...................................................... 6\n\nCompulife Software Inc. v. Newman,\n  959 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2020) ............................................................................5\n\nGines v. D.R. Horton, Inc.,\n   699 F.3d 812 (5th Cir. 2012) ................................................................................4\n\nMarek Vrother Sys. Inc. v. Enriquez,\n  2019 WL 3322162 (N.D. Tex. July 24, 2019) ...................................................... 8\n\nSharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of Alton,\n   354 S.W.3d 407 (Tex. 2011) ................................................................................9\n\nSMH Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Krispy Krunchy Foods, L.L.C.,\n  2021 WL 1226411 (E.D. La. Apr. 1, 2021)........................................................10\n\n\n\n\n                                                       ii\n\f   Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24                                   Page 4 of 18 PageID 136\n\n\n\nSuissi v. Wells Fargo Bank Nat'l Ass'n as Tr. for Soundview Home\n   Loan Tr. 2007-OPT4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-\n   OPT4,\n   2023 WL 2700721 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2023) ...................................................10\n\nTuck v. Methanex Management, Inc.,\n   2006 WL 6581524 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2006) ...................................................... 8\n\nVan Buren v. U.S.,\n  141 S.Ct. 1648 (2021) ...........................................................................................6\n\nVariable Annuity Life Insurance Co. v. Coreth,\n  535 F. Supp. 3d 488 (E.D. Va. 2021) ................................................................... 5\n\nWhite Glove Staffing, Inc. v. Methodist Hosps. of Dallas,\n  947 F.3d 301 (5th Cir. 2020) ............................................................................2, 8\n\nOTHER AUTHORITIES\n\nRule 9(b)...................................................................................................................10\n\nRule 12 .......................................................................................................................7\n\n\n\n\n                                                              iii\n\f  Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24         Page 5 of 18 PageID 137\n\n\n\n      Nationstar assumes its allegations and entitlement to relief are undisputed. Not\n\nso. While Defendants dispute Nationstar\u2019s allegations, they will respond\n\nsubstantively at the proper time.\n\n      Defendants\u2019 Motion demonstrates that Nationstar omitted facts needed to\n\nsustain its claims and pled facts foreclosing certain of its other claims. Both defects\n\njustify dismissal, particularly because they undo Nationstar\u2019s federal claims and this\n\nCourt\u2019s basis for subject matter jurisdiction. In response, Nationstar tries to buttress\n\nits pleadings with rhetoric and extrinsic sources, but its claims must be assessed on\n\nthe factual allegations in the Complaint. Nationstar also downplays the conflict\n\nbetween its factual pleadings and legal theories on the basis that its invalid claims\n\nare pled \u201cin the alternative.\u201d But alternative pleading does not allow Nationstar to\n\npursue legal claims foreclosed by its own factual allegations. The presumption of\n\ntruth cuts both ways.\n\n      For the reasons below and in Defendants\u2019 Motion, the Court should dismiss\n\nNationstar\u2019s Complaint.\n\n\n\n\n                                           1\n\f     Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24                     Page 6 of 18 PageID 138\n\n\n\n                                            ARGUMENT1\n\nI.      The Court Should Dismiss Nationstar\u2019s Contract Claims\n\n        A.      Nationstar Failed to Plead Privity of Contract Necessary for Its\n                Breach of Contract and Indemnification Claims\n\n        Nationstar concedes that it failed to plead the identity of its contractual\n\ncounterparty but argues the omission can be overlooked because Nationstar alleged\n\nthat \u201cACI assumed Speedpay\u2019s contractual rights and obligations.\u201d See Opp. 7. But\n\nNationstar\u2019s own cited cases demonstrate that it failed to plead successor liability.\n\n        In Renfro v. HCR Pool III Funding Corp., the plaintiff brought contract claims\n\nagainst two non-contractual parties that had purchased the assets of plaintiff\u2019s\n\ncounterparty. The court explained that successor liability may attach to defendants\n\nonly if they \u201cexpressly assume[d] the liability of the predecessor,\u201d 2006 WL\n\n8437652, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2006), and dismissed plaintiff\u2019s claims because\n\nit omitted this allegation. Id. Nationstar\u2019s claims also fail because it does not allege\n\nwhich Defendant is Speedpay\u2019s successor or that one of the Defendants expressly\n\nassumed Speedpay\u2019s liabilities. Such specific pleadings are necessary to impose\n\ncontractual liability on a non-contract party.\n\n\n\n\n1\n  Nationstar waives the argument in footnote 1 of its opposition. See White Glove Staffing, Inc. v. Methodist\nHosps. of Dallas, 947 F.3d 301, 308 (5th Cir. 2020) (\u201cArguments subordinated in a footnote . . . are\nwaived.\u201d). And Nationstar has not requested leave to amend the Complaint if the Motion is granted, so the\ninterests of judicial efficiency and deciding cases on their merits inherent in the Court\u2019s procedures would\nbe served by considering Defendants\u2019 motion, not striking it.\n\n\n                                                     2\n\f  Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24        Page 7 of 18 PageID 139\n\n\n\n      Similarly, in United States v. Vista Hospice Care, Inc., the court dismissed the\n\nplaintiff\u2019s contract claim because it failed to plead the \u201csuccessor expressly or\n\nimpliedly agree[d] to assume liabilities of predecessor, transaction is considered a\n\nde facto merger, successor is considered a \u2018mere continuation\u2019 of predecessor, or\n\ntransaction was fraudulent.\u201d 2014 WL 12580020, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2014).\n\nThe same should happen here. Nationstar does not allege that Speedpay merged into\n\na Defendant, a Defendant is a \u201cmere continuation\u201d of Speedpay, or the Speedpay\n\nacquisition was fraudulent. Indeed, Nationstar cannot plead the necessary facts\n\nbecause \u201cit does not know with certainty which entity assumed [Speedpay\u2019s]\n\nobligations.\u201d Opp. 5. If one of the Defendants were its contractual counterparty, then\n\nNationstar would know and must plead this element.\n\n      B.     Nationstar Failed to Plead Defendants Had Discretionary\n             Authority, As Needed to State an Implied Covenant Claim\n      Nationstar argues that it sufficiently pled its implied covenant claim simply\n\nby stating that Defendants breached the MSA. See Opp. 9\u201310. Nationstar is wrong,\n\nand the case it cites demonstrates why. In Amoco Oil Co. v. Ervin, the court\n\nexplained, \u201c[t]he duty of good faith and fair dealing applies when one party has\n\ndiscretionary authority to determine certain terms of the contract, such as quantity,\n\nprice, or time.\u201d 908 P.2d 493, 498 (Colo. 1995), as modified on denial of reh'g (Jan.\n\n16, 1996). Nationstar alleged only that Defendants \u201cfail[ed] to ensure that the\n\nServices that [they] provided accurately and correctly performed the functions\n\n\n                                          3\n\f     Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24                      Page 8 of 18 PageID 140\n\n\n\nrequired to make customer payments as intended.\u201d Opp. 9. But that is a far cry from\n\npleading that Speedpay (or a successor) was granted discretion to unilaterally\n\ndetermine, in good faith, fundamental contract terms, such as quantity, price, or the\n\ntime of performance. 2\n\nII.       The Court Should Dismiss Nationstar\u2019s Tort Claims\n\n          Nationstar does not oppose Defendants\u2019 argument that, if the Court holds that\n\nNationstar\u2019s contract claims fail, then the tort claims also fail because they are\n\nderivative of Nationstar\u2019s deficient MSA allegations. See Mot. 8. Nationstar has thus\n\nabandoned this issue, requiring dismissal of these claims. See Arkansas v.\n\nWilmington Trust National Association, 2020 WL 1249570, at *5 (N.D. Tex. Mar.\n\n16, 2020) (\u201cFailure of a party to respond to arguments raised in a motion to dismiss\n\nconstitutes waiver or abandonment of that issue[.].\u201d). Nationstar\u2019s tort claims fail for\n\nadditional reasons.\n\n          A.       The DTSA, TUTSA, TTLA, and CFAA Claims Fail Because\n                   Nationstar Pled that It Provided NPI to Defendants\n          Nationstar\u2019s DTSA, TUTSA, TTLA, and CFAA claims fail because\n\nNationstar pled that it gave Defendants its customers\u2019 NPI pursuant to the MSA. See,\n\ne.g., Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 43\u201348. Even the press release that Nationstar improperly references3\n\n\n2\n Nationstar purports to quote language from the MSA in support of its opposition. See Opp. 10, n. 6. But\nneither Nationstar nor Defendants have attached the MSA to their filings. Nationstar may not rely on MSA\nprovisions out of context. See Gines v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 699 F.3d 812, 820 (5th Cir. 2012).\n3\n    See Gines, 699 F.3d at 820 (\u201c[A] district court may not \u2018go outside of the complaint.\u2019\u201d).\n\n\n                                                       4\n\f  Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24        Page 9 of 18 PageID 141\n\n\n\nmakes this point clear. See Opp. 16 n.12 (\u201cACI used actual consumer data it had\n\nreceived from Mr. Cooper.\u201d). Nationstar fails to explain how these claims\u2014which\n\nrequire Defendants to have misappropriated, stolen, and hacked NPI\u2014can proceed\n\nwhen Nationstar pled that it gave NPI to Defendants under the MSA.\n\n      On the DTSA and TUTSA claims, Nationstar argues that Defendants acquired\n\nthe NPI subject to the confidentiality terms of the MSA and then \u201crecklessly cop[ied]\n\nand us[ed] the NPI for its own QA testing in a live production environment without\n\nNationstar\u2019s authorization.\u201d Opp. 19. But this concedes that Defendants rightfully\n\naccessed NPI. The alleged wrongful act was not Defendants\u2019 accessing NPI but\n\nrather Defendants purportedly uploading NPI to a live production environment,\n\nwhich Nationstar says triggered the so-called \u201cIncident.\u201d\n\n      The out-of-circuit cases that Nationstar cites in support of its DTSA and\n\nTUTSA claims are distinguishable. None permitted a trade secret claim to proceed\n\nwhere the plaintiff gave trade secrets to the defendant but was allegedly harmed by\n\nthe defendant\u2019s subsequent use. See Compulife Software Inc. v. Newman, 959 F.3d\n\n1288 (11th Cir. 2020) (defendant discovered trade secrets by taking aerial\n\nphotographs of methanol plant); Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co. v. Coreth, 535\n\nF. Supp. 3d 488, 515 (E.D. Va. 2021) (defendants surreptitiously took customer\n\ninformation, resigned, and used it to compete against plaintiff).\n\n\n\n\n                                          5\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24        Page 10 of 18 PageID 142\n\n\n\n      The DTSA and TUTSA claims also fail because Nationstar failed to plead the\n\nexistence of a trade secret. Nationstar analogizes NPI to customer lists and\n\ninformation that can sometimes be trade secrets but no factual allegations in the\n\nComplaint justify that comparison. Indeed, Nationstar avoided alleging any facts that\n\nreveal what NPI is. See, e.g., Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 4\u20137, 34\u201337. Nationstar also does not allege\n\nsufficient facts regarding its precautions to maintain the secrecy of NPI. Nationstar\n\npoints to the MSA\u2019s confidentiality provision but much more detail is needed to\n\nplead this element. See, e.g., BRG Insurance Solutions LLC v. O\u2019Connell, 2017 WL\n\n7513649, at *8 (N.D. Tex. July 18, 2017) (password-protected databases,\n\nconfidentiality and nondisclosure agreements, and information only disseminated on\n\na need-to-know basis).\n\n      Nationstar also failed to allege the independent economic value of the NPI\u2019s\n\nsecrecy. See Compl. \u00b6 94 (skipping this element). Nationstar\u2019s only response is to\n\npoint to the alleged harms resulting from the \u201cIncident,\u201d but that is insufficient. To\n\nplead this element, Nationstar needed to allege the value it derives from protecting\n\nNPI from its competitors, not the harm it allegedly sustained from a business\n\npartner\u2019s purported misuse.\n\n      Regarding its CFAA claim, Nationstar argues that Van Buren v. U.S., 141\n\nS.Ct. 1648 (2021) may be ignored \u201cbecause it does not bear on the sufficiency of\n\npleading at the 12(b)(6) stage.\u201d Opp. 21. To the contrary, Van Buren held that the\n\n\n                                          6\n\f    Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24                  Page 11 of 18 PageID 143\n\n\n\nsame CFAA theory alleged by Nationstar was foreclosed as a matter of law. The\n\npurpose of Rule 12 is to separate the wheat from the chaff at the pleading stage.\n\nNationstar\u2019s attempted reliance on Leitner v. Morsovillo is misplaced because that\n\nplaintiff alleged the defendants \u201caccessed data which was off-limits to them without\n\nher authorization or consent.\u201d 2021 WL 2669547, at *4 (W.D. Mo. June 29, 2021).\n\nBy contrast, in Van Buren and here, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants accessed\n\ninformation available to them but then used it for an improper purpose.\n\n        Nationstar concedes that its TTLA trade secret misappropriation claim is\n\npreempted but seemingly argues that it also pled a TTLA civil theft claim that is not\n\npreempted. See Opp. 20. That is wrong. See Compl. \u00b6\u00b6 131\u201338 (pleading only TTLA\n\ntrade secret misappropriation claim). Even if Nationstar did, the Complaint does not\n\nstate a TTLA civil theft claim because Nationstar alleged that Defendants\n\nmisappropriated copies of NPI4 rather than original data. See BHL Boresight, Inc. v.\n\nGeo-Steering Sols., Inc., 2017 WL 2730739, at *15 (S.D. Tex. June 26, 2017)\n\n(holding the plaintiff \u201ccannot maintain\u201d a TTLA claim based on misappropriated\n\ncopies of user guides and software but could move forward with TTLA claim based\n\non theft of physical USB devices that contained unique data).\n\n\n\n\n4\n  Nationstar\u2019s Complaint and opposition are clear that Defendants allegedly accessed copies of NPI rather\nthan taking the original NPI. See Opp. 19.\n\n\n                                                   7\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24         Page 12 of 18 PageID 144\n\n\n\n      B.     Nationstar Failed to Plead the Existence of Third Party Contracts,\n             As Needed for Its Tortious Interference Claim\n\n      In response to Defendants\u2019 argument that it must plead basic details about\n\npurported third party contracts to state a tortious interference claim, Nationstar only\n\npoints to its allegation that \u201cACI knew of facts that would lead a reasonable person\n\nto conclude that Nationstar had contracts with its borrowers\u201d and its accompanying\n\nrecitation of the claim\u2019s elements. Opp. 24. That is insufficient. Nationstar must\n\nplead the existence and details of specific third party contracts and how Defendants\n\nallegedly interfered with them. See Marek Vrother Sys. Inc. v. Enriquez, 2019 WL\n\n3322162, at *5 (N.D. Tex. July 24, 2019). Instead, Nationstar leaves Defendants and\n\nthe Court to read between the lines, pile \u201cinference upon inference,\u201d and guess at the\n\nbasic facts of Nationstar\u2019s claim. Tuck v. Methanex Management, Inc., 2006 WL\n\n6581524, at *3 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2006).\n\n      C.     The Negligence and Gross Negligence Claims Fail Because\n             Nationstar Did Not Plead Defendants Owed a Special Duty of Care\n      Nationstar waives its negligence claim by opposing Defendants\u2019 arguments in\n\na footnote. See White Glove Staffing, 947 F.3d at 308. Absent waiver, Nationstar\u2019s\n\nnegligence claims fails because it makes no legal argument in support of them,\n\nsaying only that it pled \u201cACI (i) knew the risk of using NPI for QA testing in a live\n\nproduction environment; (ii) knew why it was a risk; and (iii) took specific actions\n\nthat disregarded that risk.\u201d Opp. 25. Such vague allegations do not suffice because\n\n\n\n                                          8\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24         Page 13 of 18 PageID 145\n\n\n\nthey leave Defendants guessing at the nature of the purported risk, its extent, when\n\nthey became aware of it, and how they disregarded it.\n\n      Nationstar also fails to rebut Defendant\u2019s argument that the negligence and\n\ngross negligence claims fail because Nationstar failed to plead that Defendants owed\n\na special duty of care to Nationstar. See Atrium Companies, Inc. v. ESR Assocs., Inc.,\n\n2012 WL 5355754, at *11 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2012).\n\n      D.     The Economic Loss Doctrine Bars Nationstar\u2019s Tort Claims\n      Beyond the fact that Nationstar omits essential facts and affirmatively pleads\n\nfacts that foreclose its tort claims, Nationstar\u2019s tort claims are barred by the\n\nEconomic Loss Doctrine (\u201cELD\u201d). Nationstar argues that the ELD does not apply if\n\nit can articulate a statutory or common law duty distinct from the MSA. That is\n\nwrong. The core inquiry in determining the applicability of the ELD is whether the\n\nclaimed damages arose from the \u201cbreach of a duty created under contract, as opposed\n\nto a duty imposed by law.\u201d Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of Alton, 354\n\nS.W.3d 407, 417 (Tex. 2011). Here, Nationstar expressly pled that the MSA is the\n\nultimate source of duties and obligations that Defendants owed to Nationstar,\n\nincluding under each of its tort claims. Mot. 8\u201313.\n\n      Nationstar also argues that the ELD does not bar its tort claims because it pled\n\nreputational damages. See Opp. 13. But Nationstar\u2019s Complaint lacks any factual\n\nallegations regarding the nature or scope of its alleged reputational harm. As this\n\n\n\n                                          9\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24         Page 14 of 18 PageID 146\n\n\n\nCourt recently held, naked allegations of non-economic harm are no obstacle for the\n\nELD. See Suissi v. Wells Fargo Bank Nat'l Ass'n as Tr. for Soundview Home Loan\n\nTr. 2007-OPT4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-OPT4, 2023 WL 2700721,\n\nat *5 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2023).\n\nIII.   The Complaint Should Be Dismissed for Group Pleading\n\n       Finally, Nationstar impermissibly relies upon group pleading, which requires\n\ndismissal of the Complaint. Mot. 24\u201326. Nationstar does not dispute using group\n\npleading, but argues there is no obligation to differentiate between \u201ccorporate\n\naffiliates\u201d in its pleading. Opp. 3. But the authorities Nationstar cites indicate no\n\nsuch thing and tolerate group pleading only where sufficiently clear \u201cto put the\n\ndefendants on notice as to who did what to whom, when, where and why\u201d and hold\n\nthat a complaint should be dismissed \u201cwhere it is \u2018entirely implausible\u2019 or impossible\n\nfor the grouped defendants to have acted as alleged.\u201d ACQIS LLC v. Lenovo Grp.\n\nLtd., 2022 WL 2705269, at *3 (W.D. Tex. July 12, 2022). Nationstar\u2019s allegations\n\ndo not provide the necessary notice to Defendants and are incoherent and impossible\n\nas pled. See Mot. 24\u201325. For instance, Nationstar does not allege how all three\n\nDefendants can have acquired or merged with Speedpay and expressly assumed its\n\ncontractual liabilities.\n\n       Furthermore, in a CFAA complaint, a plaintiff must plead fraud with the\n\nrequisite particularity as to each of the defendants pursuant to Rule 9(b). See SMH\n\n\n\n                                         10\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24         Page 15 of 18 PageID 147\n\n\n\nEnterprises, L.L.C. v. Krispy Krunchy Foods, L.L.C., 2021 WL 1226411, at *5 (E.D.\n\nLa. Apr. 1, 2021). Nationstar\u2019s allegations lack the required precision and seem\n\ndesigned to get at the ultimate corporate parent\u2013\u2013ACI Worldwide, Inc.\u2013\u2013without\n\nalleging an alter ego theory or demonstrating why the parent is liable for its own role\n\nin the alleged wrongdoing.\n\n      Nationstar\u2019s estoppel argument is baseless. There is no inconsistency or\n\ninequity in permitting Defendants to use broad language when negotiating a waiver\n\nof liability (especially when Defendants denied the allegations against them), while\n\nrequiring Nationstar to plead claims and facts against the appropriate entity.\n\n                                  CONCLUSION\n      For the reasons stated above and in Defendants\u2019 Motion, the Court should\n\ndismiss Nationstar\u2019s Complaint.\n\n\n\n\n                                          11\n\fCase 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24   Page 16 of 18 PageID 148\n\n\n\nDated: January 12, 2024              Respectfully submitted,\n\n                                     /s/ Matthew A. Kairis\n\n                                     Matthew A. Kairis\n                                     Texas State Bar No. 24117376\n                                     Jonathan D. Guynn\n                                     Texas State Bar No. 24120232\n                                     Timothy M. Villari\n                                     Texas State Bar No. 24125870\n                                     JONES DAY\n                                     2727 North Harwood Street\n                                     Dallas, TX 75201.1515\n                                     Phone: (214) 969-3605\n                                     Fax: (214) 969-5100\n                                     Email: makairis@jonesday.com\n                                     E-mail: jguynn@jonesday.com\n                                     E-mail: tvillari@jonesday.com\n\n                                     Courtney Snyder, Esq. (pro hac vice\n                                     pending)\n                                     JONES DAY\n                                     500 Grant Street, Suite 4500\n                                     Pittsburgh, PA 15219\n                                     Phone: (412) 391-3939\n                                     Fax: (412) 394-7959\n                                     Email: clsnyder@jonesday.com\n                                     Counsel for ACI Payments, Inc., ACI\n                                     Worldwide Corp., and ACI Worldwide,\n                                     Inc.\n\n\n\n\n                                   12\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24      Page 17 of 18 PageID 149\n\n\n\n                     CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT\n\n      I certify that the foregoing reply brief contains less than 2,500 words,\n\nincluding footnotes and complies with the Court\u2019s Standing Order \u00a7 II(A).\n\n\n                                                  /s/ Timothy M. Villari\n                                                 Attorney for Defendants\n\n\n\n\n                                       13\n\f Case 3:23-cv-02089-E Document 18 Filed 01/12/24        Page 18 of 18 PageID 150\n\n\n\n                         CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE\n\n      I certify that the foregoing was filed through the Court\u2019s ECF system on\n\nJanuary 12, 2024, notice of which will be sent electronically to all counsel\n\nof record.\n\n\n                                                    /s/ Timothy M. Villari\n                                                   Attorney for Defendants\n\n\n\n\n                                         14\n\f","ocr_status":2,"date_upload":"2024-01-18T06:12:19.166940-08:00","document_number":"18","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016541937","is_available":true,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.334728-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.340226-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-12","time_filed":null,"entry_number":18,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-12.002","pacer_sequence_number":62,"description":"REPLY filed by ACI Payments Inc, ACI Worldwide Corp, ACI Worldwide Inc re: 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Villari, Timothy) (Entered: 01/12/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926066/","id":375926066,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541883/","id":383541883,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/17/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.313468-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.322061-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"17","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016541861","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.292807-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.298670-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-12","time_filed":null,"entry_number":17,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-12.001","pacer_sequence_number":60,"description":"Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Courtney L. Snyder (Filing fee $100; Receipt number ATXNDC-14309738) filed by ACI Payments Inc, ACI Worldwide Corp, ACI Worldwide Inc (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order) (Villari, Timothy) (Entered: 01/12/2024)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926065/","id":375926065,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541882/","id":383541882,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/16/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.268819-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.279433-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"16","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016504407","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.250429-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.254891-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-28","time_filed":null,"entry_number":16,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-28.002","pacer_sequence_number":57,"description":"NOTICE of Attorney Admission re: 11 Order,, filed by ACI Payments Inc, ACI Worldwide Corp, ACI Worldwide Inc (Villari, Timothy) (Entered: 12/28/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926064/","id":375926064,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541881/","id":383541881,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/15/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.229488-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.238886-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"15","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016504397","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.209545-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.214130-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-28","time_filed":null,"entry_number":15,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-28.001","pacer_sequence_number":55,"description":"NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Timothy Michael Villari on behalf of ACI Payments Inc, ACI Worldwide Corp, ACI Worldwide Inc. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Villari, Timothy) (Entered: 12/28/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926063/","id":375926063,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541880/","id":383541880,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/14/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.187758-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.197097-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"14","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016498389","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.169682-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.173673-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-22","time_filed":null,"entry_number":14,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-22.001","pacer_sequence_number":52,"description":"OBJECTION filed by Nationstar Mortgage LLC re: 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Opitz, Justin) (Entered: 12/22/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926062/","id":375926062,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541879/","id":383541879,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/13/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.148959-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.157948-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"13","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016464595","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.125574-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.129728-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-11","time_filed":null,"entry_number":13,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-11.001","pacer_sequence_number":47,"description":"Court Request for Recusal: Magistrate Judge David L. Horan recused pursuant to provisions of 28 U.S.C. 455. Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford assigned for matters that may be referred in this case. (cea) (Entered: 12/11/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926061/","id":375926061,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541878/","id":383541878,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/12/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.103691-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.113952-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"12","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.084261-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.088683-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-08","time_filed":null,"entry_number":12,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-08.002","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 10 Motion to Extend Time to File Response/Reply. Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion for Extension of Time. The Court, after considering the Motion and agreement of the parties, finds that it should be and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Nationstar's deadline to file a response to the ACI Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. 9] or Amended Complaint is extended through December 22, 2023, and the ACI Defendants' deadline to reply (if Nationstar files a response) or a responsive pleading (if Nationstar amends) is extended through January 12, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 12/8/2023) (chmb) (Entered: 12/08/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926060/","id":375926060,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541877/","id":383541877,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/11/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.064360-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.073756-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"11","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.045271-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.049691-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-08","time_filed":null,"entry_number":11,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-08.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"ELECTRONIC ORDER: It has come to the Court's attention that Defendant's Counsel Matthew A. Kairis is not admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Therefore, within 20 days from the date of this order, counsel for Plaintiff must either become admitted to practice in this District (See LR 83.7), or move the Court to be admitted Pro Hac Vice (See LR 83.9(b)). Failure to do so may result in sanctions being imposed for failure to comply with an order of the Court. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 12/8/2023) (chmb) (Entered: 12/08/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926059/","id":375926059,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541876/","id":383541876,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/10/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.022727-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.034232-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"10","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016460707","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.003614-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.008012-08:00","date_filed":"2023-12-07","time_filed":null,"entry_number":10,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-12-07.001","pacer_sequence_number":40,"description":"MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Nationstar Mortgage LLC with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Opitz, Justin) (Entered: 12/07/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926058/","id":375926058,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541875/","id":383541875,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/9/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.981019-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.990711-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"9","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016430141","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.961414-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.965617-08:00","date_filed":"2023-11-24","time_filed":null,"entry_number":9,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-11-24.001","pacer_sequence_number":29,"description":"Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by ACI Payments Inc, ACI Worldwide Corp, ACI Worldwide Inc with Brief/Memorandum in Support. Attorney Jonathan David Guynn added to party ACI Payments Inc(pty:dft), Attorney Jonathan David Guynn added to party ACI Worldwide Corp(pty:dft), Attorney Jonathan David Guynn added to party ACI Worldwide Inc (pty:dft) (Guynn, Jonathan) (Entered: 11/24/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926057/","id":375926057,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541874/","id":383541874,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/8/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.937003-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.949022-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"8","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016312271","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.918040-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.922392-08:00","date_filed":"2023-09-29","time_filed":null,"entry_number":8,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-09-29.003","pacer_sequence_number":27,"description":"WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to ACI Worldwide Inc. Waiver sent on 9/25/2023. (Opitz, Justin) (Entered: 09/29/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926056/","id":375926056,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541873/","id":383541873,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/7/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.898448-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.906388-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"7","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016312263","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.877802-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.884120-08:00","date_filed":"2023-09-29","time_filed":null,"entry_number":7,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-09-29.002","pacer_sequence_number":25,"description":"WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to ACI Worldwide Corp. Waiver sent on 9/25/2023. (Opitz, Justin) (Entered: 09/29/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375926055/","id":375926055,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383541872/","id":383541872,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/6/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.853577-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.864540-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"6","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016312249","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.830982-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:51.835594-08:00","date_filed":"2023-09-29","time_filed":null,"entry_number":6,"recap_sequence_number":"2023-09-29.001","pacer_sequence_number":23,"description":"WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to ACI Payments Inc. Waiver sent on 9/25/2023. (Opitz, Justin) (Entered: 09/29/2023)","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375853761/","id":375853761,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383467677/","id":383467677,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"","date_created":"2024-01-17T11:23:22.356646-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-17T11:23:22.366739-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-17T11:23:22.324568-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-17T11:23:22.324603-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-17","time_filed":"12:57:23","entry_number":null,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-17.001","pacer_sequence_number":null,"description":"","tags":[]},{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/375816115/","id":375816115,"docket":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/dockets/67809303/","recap_documents":[{"resource_uri":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/recap-documents/383429457/","id":383429457,"tags":[],"absolute_url":"/docket/67809303/20/nationstar-mortgage-llc-v-aci-payments-inc/","date_created":"2024-01-17T07:20:09.095169-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.540431-08:00","sha1":"","page_count":null,"file_size":null,"filepath_local":null,"filepath_ia":"","ia_upload_failure_count":null,"thumbnail":null,"thumbnail_status":0,"plain_text":"","ocr_status":null,"date_upload":null,"document_number":"20","attachment_number":null,"pacer_doc_id":"177016547995","is_available":false,"is_free_on_pacer":null,"is_sealed":null,"document_type":1,"description":"Order Reassigning Case","acms_document_guid":""}],"date_created":"2024-01-17T07:20:09.077636-08:00","date_modified":"2024-01-18T06:11:52.500062-08:00","date_filed":"2024-01-16","time_filed":null,"entry_number":20,"recap_sequence_number":"2024-01-16.002","pacer_sequence_number":69,"description":"***UNFILED PER ELECTRONIC ORDER 21*** ORDER: The above styled and numbered case is TRANSFERRED to the docket of the Honorable Chief Judge David C. Godbey, and shall henceforth carry the suffix letter \"N.\" Judge Ada Brown no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 1/16/2024) (ndt) Modified docket text on 1/17/2024 (ali). (Entered: 01/17/2024)","tags":[]}],"entries_total":"https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=67809303&page_size=40"}